What is contract automation software and how does it cover the full lifecycle?
Contract automation software covers the full lifecycle of a business contract: draft from templates with merge from live records, approve through internal review chains, sign with e-signature on a compliant flow, track obligations and commitments across the term, renew with the paper drafted 120 days before term end, and archive the executed artifact for the retention window with full-text search. Most contract tools cover the first three stages. Strkr covers all six because the contract is a working object (obligations, commitments, renewal pipeline), not a terminal artifact that stops mattering after signature.
How does obligation tracking work after signature?
Executed contracts carry obligation records: specific commitments with description, owner, frequency, next-due date, and status. SLA commitments track against operational reality (uptime monitoring data, support response metrics). Reporting commitments schedule as recurring tasks. MFN clauses flag on the account. Price holds carry start and end dates. Termination windows carry the start, end, and notice period. Milestones carry target dates and acceptance criteria. Compliance obligations track annual refresh cadences. Alerts fire a configurable window before each next-due date. The common failure where contractual commitments disappear into a shared drive after signature does not happen.
What does the renewal motion look like in Strkr?
The renewal watchlist shows every active renewal in the next 180 days, sorted by close date, filterable by health tier, segment, and owner. When a renewal falls inside 120 days of term end, the flow drops a prep task on the owner, generates a renewal brief with value delivered and usage momentum, drafts the renewal paper, and opens the renewal opportunity in the right stage. Uplift calculations pull from the contract: scheduled uplift terms plus mid-term expansion captured during the current term. Multi-year contracts render the full uplift schedule on a single timeline. Co-termed contracts align under one renewal date with the prorated bridge computed automatically. The motion starts four months out by default, which correlates with higher renewal rates.
Can we track portfolio-level analytics on the contract book?
Yes. Portfolio dashboards cover total ARR under contract, uplift exposure across the next 12 months, SLA exposure by tier, non-standard clause distribution, MFN exposure, renewal pipeline, legal volume, and vendor contract analytics. Clause-level reporting answers which contracts carry which variants (which have the non-standard SLA, which have the MFN clause, which have the specific limitation of liability variant). The CFO, GC, and CRO walk into the quarterly review with the real contract portfolio in one view instead of a reconciled approximation from three separate reports.
How does Strkr handle enterprise counterparties that insist on DocuSign on their side?
E-signature is native in Strkr. Sending for signature, tracking delivery and open events, countersignature, and archival of the signed PDF all happen inside the platform with no second vendor. For enterprise counterparties that insist on DocuSign or PandaDoc on their side, Strkr integrates with both as signature destinations. The template library, the merge fields, the clause library, and the approval chain still run inside Strkr, and only the final signature step hands off. The signed artifact posts back to the record so the archive, the obligation records, and the audit log stay intact.
Does contract automation software ship on every tier or is it an add-on?
The full contract automation stack (templates, clause library, approval chains, e-signature, obligation tracking, renewal watchlist, archive, portfolio analytics, audit log) ships on every paid tier at no extra charge. Strkr charges flat per seat with no per-contract fee, no per-signature fee, and no credit meter on the assistant. There is no separate contract SKU and no implementation partner requirement to connect the pieces because the pieces are the same system as the CRM.