What is RPA (robotic process automation)?
RPA is software that automates repetitive tasks by mimicking human interactions with computer systems. The classic approach deploys software bots that open applications, click buttons, read fields, and type data between systems. The approach was designed for legacy systems that lacked modern APIs (mainframes, government portals, old desktop apps). For modern SaaS systems with APIs, native API-based automation delivers the same jobs faster (10-100x), more reliably, and without specialist developers. Strkr implements the useful shape of RPA through native integrations and the Flows runtime rather than through screen-scraping bots.
What are examples of RPA automation?
Common examples: lead triage (read form submits, enrich, score, route, draft reply), data entry (pull values from one system, write to another), document extraction (read PDFs, extract fields, write to records), reconciliation (match records across systems, flag discrepancies), report generation (run reports, format, email to recipients), routine notifications (check status changes, send alerts). Each of these is a classic RPA use case. In Strkr they ship as native Flows that use APIs rather than UI scraping. The result is faster execution, better reliability, and no per-bot licensing.
How is RPA different from workflow automation?
RPA was originally defined by its approach: screen-scraping bots that mimic human UI interactions, built for legacy systems without APIs. Workflow automation is a broader category: any software that executes a sequence of steps based on triggers and conditions. The two categories have converged as RPA vendors added API-based capabilities and workflow automation tools added screen-scraping options. The practical distinction is: use screen-scraping when the target has no API; use API-based workflow automation when the target has an API. For revenue-operations work on modern SaaS, API-based automation covers roughly 90 percent of use cases.
When is RPA still worth deploying?
Three cases where RPA remains the right tool. First, no-API systems: legacy mainframes, government portals, old desktop apps, vendor UIs with no public API. Second, migration bridging: during a move from a legacy system to a modern SaaS, RPA can keep the legacy running while the modern integrations stabilize. Third, extreme UI-only workflows: if the entire "process" being automated is a human clicking through screens in a specific order with no system changes, RPA fits the shape. For revenue-operations work on modern SaaS, native automation is the better tool and should be the first choice.
Can Strkr replace an existing RPA deployment?
For the revenue-operations portion, yes. Teams running classic RPA (UiPath, Automation Anywhere, Blue Prism, Power Automate) typically migrate bot-by-bot to native Flows where modern APIs exist. The RPA footprint shrinks to just the legacy-edge cases. Strkr's native integrations include outbound webhooks to call RPA orchestrators and inbound webhooks to accept callback results, so the two systems coexist cleanly during migration. Over a quarter or two the RPA license count drops by 60-80 percent while automation coverage increases through added AI capabilities and native cross-module Flows.
Does Strkr include document OCR?
Yes, as a native Strkr AI step inside any Flow. Drop a PDF into a Flow and the AI extracts the fields (invoice number, amount, due date, line items, contract terms) to structured output. The next step writes the extracted fields to the record (contact, deal, invoice, order). The capability that classic RPA vendors sell as "Intelligent Document Processing" with a separate license is included on Pro with no add-on SKU. Teams processing high volumes of invoices, contracts, or forms typically see this as the most valuable AI step in their Flow library.