Built for Law Firm Practice Managers

The CRM for the practice manager who runs utilization, forecast, and pricing in the same hour.

A practice group manager at an Am Law 100 to 500 firm runs the group across 40 to 150 lawyers, 300 to 1,500 open matters, a weekly utilization report the firm managing partner reads on Monday, a monthly matter forecast the firm CFO rolls up, a pricing committee prep on every non-standard fee arrangement, and cross-practice staffing conversations with 10 to 20 other practice managers. The firm practice management system (Elite, Aderant, Centerbase) handles billing, not pipeline. The firm CRM handles pitches, not practice utilization. Strkr collapses the practice manager week into one workspace built for the practice group operator.

Start free trial See pricing
Why buyers are here

Law Firms Practice Managers: the daily pains.

Practice group managers run a different week than the business development team, the partners, or the firm managing partner. The practice manager is accountable for practice-level utilization against a 1,800 to 2,100 hour annual target per lawyer, a monthly matter forecast that rolls up to the firm CFO, pricing committee prep on non-standard fee arrangements, cross-practice staffing conversations across 10 to 20 other practice managers, and client-team profitability per matter per partner. The practice manager has none of that in one place today. The common stack is Elite or Aderant for billing, InterAction or ContactEase for firm-wide CRM, Excel for forecast rollup, SharePoint for pricing memos, and a weekly meeting with the firm managing partner where the practice manager reconstructs the week from memory. The six pains below show up on every practice manager buyer call we run with Am Law 100 to 500 firms.

Utilization opacity

I only see utilization at the month close.

The firm practice management system renders utilization at month close with a 15 day lag. The practice manager finds out in week 2 of the next month that a litigation senior associate ran 60 percent utilization last month, and the conversation to course-correct lands 20 days late. Strkr renders practice-level utilization on a native dashboard with daily sync from the practice management system, weekly delta per lawyer, projected month-end utilization, and a flag when a lawyer drops below the practice threshold. The course-correction conversation lands in week 2 of the month, not week 2 of the next month.

Matter forecast guess

The CFO asks for the forecast and I reconstruct from 40 emails.

The firm CFO runs a monthly matter forecast roll-up across every practice group. The practice manager asks every partner for the matter forecast on a 48 hour deadline, 20 partners reply with a mix of email, Slack message, and in-person comments, and the practice manager sums the 20 responses into a Google Sheet nobody trusts. Strkr runs a native hierarchical matter forecast with per-matter commit, best case, and pipeline categories, submit-lock on a weekly cadence, and automatic rollup to the practice manager and firm CFO. The forecast lands on time with a shared record instead of a reconstructed guess.

Pricing committee cold prep

Every non-standard fee arrangement starts cold.

The firm pricing committee reviews non-standard fee arrangements (alternative fee arrangements, non-standard retainer sizes, discounts past the approved band, matter types outside the practice standard). The practice manager prepares the prep memo across SharePoint, Excel, Elite, and the originating partner email thread, with a 3 day lead time per memo. Strkr holds matter scope and fee arrangement on the Products module, routes the prep view to the pricing committee with the originating partner commentary, the comparable matter history, and the practice group approval status pre-loaded. The prep memo takes 20 minutes instead of a half-day.

Cross-practice staffing silos

I never know when another practice group has free capacity.

The practice manager is staffing a complex corporate deal that needs tax, employment, and real estate support. The practice manager pings three other practice managers over email asking for capacity. Two reply the next day, one replies after the staffing decision has already been made. Strkr renders cross-practice staffing availability on a shared view with current utilization, projected utilization over the next 90 days, matter-type experience, and partner-team preferences per lawyer across every practice group. The practice manager runs the staffing conversation off the shared record in one meeting instead of three email threads.

Client-team profitability void

I cannot tell which clients are actually profitable.

The firm practice management system tracks matter billing and matter costs, but the client-team profitability (fully-loaded cost of the matter team against the realized matter revenue) is not a view the practice manager can open. The firm managing partner asks which clients should be reviewed for a fee increase or exit, and the practice manager runs a 2 day Elite report build. Strkr tracks client-team profitability on the account record with fully-loaded cost against realized revenue over a 24 month window so the quarterly client review opens with a shared record.

Firm managing partner weekly review

I rebuild the practice week every Monday morning.

The firm managing partner runs a 30 minute weekly review per practice group every Monday. The practice manager spends Sunday night reconstructing the week across utilization, matter closes, pipeline movement, pricing committee outcomes, lateral candidates, and client issues. Strkr opens the Monday review with a shared practice-level record the firm managing partner and the practice manager both see. The reconstruction retires on week two of the trial.

How Strkr fits the practice manager week

The primitives practice managers actually run the group on.

Strkr for law firm practice managers ships the same CRM the business development team, the partners, and the associates run, with practice-manager-tier views layered on top. The primitives below map to the four jobs a practice manager repeats every week: run utilization against the practice-level target, roll up the matter forecast to the firm CFO, prep the pricing committee on non-standard fee arrangements, and run cross-practice staffing conversations. When those four jobs happen inside one workspace with context pre-loaded, the practice manager stops reconstructing the week every Monday and starts running the practice group.

Utilization dashboard

Practice-level utilization, daily sync.

The practice utilization dashboard renders every lawyer in the group with annual billable target, year-to-date utilization, four-week trailing average, projected year-end total, and a flag when a lawyer drops below the practice threshold. Daily sync from the firm practice management system means the practice manager runs the Monday review on real numbers, not a 15 day lag.

Matter forecast

Per-matter commit, best case, pipeline, rolled up.

Partners submit a weekly matter forecast per open matter with category calls (commit, best case, pipeline, omit), estimated close month, estimated matter revenue, and a one-line note the practice manager reads before the roll-up meeting. Submit-lock on Friday 5 PM, override surface for the practice manager, and automatic rollup to the firm CFO. One number, no spreadsheet war.

Pricing committee prep

Non-standard fee memos drafted from the deal record.

A non-standard fee arrangement (AFA, retainer past the size threshold, discount past the band, matter type outside standard) fires a pricing committee prep view with the matter scope, the fee basis, the comparable matter history, the originating partner commentary, and the practice group approval status pre-loaded. The practice manager routes the memo in 20 minutes instead of a half-day build.

Cross-practice staffing

Capacity across every practice group, one view.

The cross-practice staffing view renders every lawyer across every practice group with current utilization, projected utilization over the next 90 days, matter-type experience, and partner-team preferences. The practice manager staffing a complex matter runs the staffing conversation off the shared view instead of three email threads.

Client-team profitability

Fully-loaded cost against realized revenue, per client.

The account record renders client-team profitability over a 24 month window with the fully-loaded cost of the matter team (associate rates, partner rates, paralegal rates, firm overhead allocation) against the realized matter revenue. The quarterly client review opens with a shared record of which clients should be reviewed for a fee increase, which should be exited, and which should be expanded.

Firm managing partner review

Weekly review opens on a shared record.

The firm managing partner weekly 30 minute review per practice group opens with a shared record of utilization, matter closes, pipeline movement, pricing committee outcomes, lateral candidates, and client issues. The firm managing partner and the practice manager see the same view. The Sunday night reconstruction retires.

Lateral candidate tracking

Lateral conversations with origination projections.

Lateral candidate conversations run on the account record with the candidate book size, the practice group fit, the matter history, the origination credit projection, the compensation ask, and the integration timeline. The practice manager runs lateral conversations with the firm managing partner on a shared record instead of a 15 email thread.

Open matter pipeline

Every active matter with budget and burn.

The open matter pipeline renders every active matter with the budget set at matter open, the burn to date, the realization rate, the staffing plan, and the next billing cycle. The practice manager runs the matter review with every partner off the shared pipeline instead of a 20 matter spreadsheet per partner.

What Strkr automates for a practice manager

The repeatable moves that should run before the Monday managing partner review.

The best practice managers automate the administrative drag across utilization reporting, matter forecasting, pricing committee prep, cross-practice staffing, and client profitability review, and spend the hours on judgment conversations with partners and the firm managing partner. Strkr Flows handle the automations every practice manager should run as native triggers with no webhook plumbing. The pattern below compounds into a Monday review that opens on a shared record, a matter forecast that lands on time, and a pricing committee prep that takes 20 minutes instead of a half-day.

Utilization digest

Monday 7 AM, lawyers below threshold surface.

Monday 7 AM, Strkr surfaces every lawyer in the practice group below the utilization threshold (typically 10 to 15 percent off pace) with the gap number, the four-week trailing average, and the suggested staffing conversation. The practice manager opens the Monday managing partner review with the course-correction conversations already surfaced instead of a 15 day lag report.

Forecast reminder

Weekly matter forecast lands on time.

Thursday 10 AM, Strkr nudges partners who have not submitted the weekly matter forecast. Friday 2 PM, Strkr escalates to the practice manager on partners still outstanding. Friday 5 PM, submit-lock engages and the practice forecast rolls up to the firm CFO. The practice manager stops chasing partners by email.

Pricing memo auto-draft

Non-standard fees fire a prep memo draft.

A deal moving to Proposal with a non-standard fee arrangement fires a Strkr Flow that drafts the pricing committee prep memo with the matter scope, the fee basis, the comparable matter history, the originating partner commentary, the practice group approval status, and the risk-adjusted margin projection pre-loaded. The practice manager edits in 20 minutes.

Cross-practice staffing request

Staffing asks route to practice managers automatically.

A matter staffing requirement outside the practice group fires a cross-practice staffing request to the relevant practice manager with the matter scope, the role needed, the timeline, and the suggested lawyer per the shared staffing availability view. The practice manager approves in 60 seconds and the staffing conversation lands in one meeting.

Matter budget burn alert

Matters past the burn threshold surface Monday.

Monday 7 AM, Strkr surfaces every matter past the budget burn threshold (typically 80 percent of budget with less than 60 percent of work complete) with the realization rate, the staffing plan, and the suggested client conversation. The practice manager runs the matter review with every partner off the shared pipeline.

Client profitability review

Quarterly client review opens with the record.

The quarterly client review fires with the fully-loaded cost against realized revenue over a 24 month window per client, the matter mix per client, the partner relationships per client, and the recommended action (expand, maintain, review for fee increase, exit). The practice manager runs the quarterly review with the firm managing partner on the shared record.

Lateral candidate pipeline

Lateral conversations surface weekly.

The weekly lateral candidate pipeline surfaces every active lateral conversation with the candidate book size, the practice group fit, the origination credit projection, the compensation ask, and the next step. The practice manager runs lateral conversations with the firm managing partner on a shared record.

Firm review prep

Monday managing partner review auto-builds.

Sunday 6 PM, Strkr builds the Monday managing partner review prep view with the practice utilization snapshot, matter closes last week, pipeline movement, pricing committee outcomes, lateral candidates in progress, open client issues, and cross-practice staffing conversations. The practice manager opens Monday with the shared record pre-built instead of a Sunday night reconstruction.

What a practice manager sees that a partner does not

The practice manager tier that stays out of the partner workspace.

A practice manager tier that creates a parallel UI is a tier partners resent. Strkr keeps the account record and the pipeline board identical for partner and practice manager, then adds a practice-manager-only overlay for utilization dashboards, matter forecast rollup, pricing committee prep, cross-practice staffing availability, and client-team profitability that partners do not need to maintain. The surfaces below are what gets added at the practice manager tier, not what gets taken away from the partner workspace.

Utilization dashboard

Every lawyer in the group, practice side only.

The practice utilization dashboard with annual target, year-to-date utilization, four-week trailing average, projected year-end total, and course-correction flags lives on the practice manager tier. Partners see their own matter hours. The practice manager sees the practice group roll-up.

Forecast rollup

Partner forecasts rolled to practice level.

Partners submit their matter forecasts. The practice manager overrides where the practice manager read differs with a one-line reason the partner sees. The practice forecast rolls up to the firm CFO on the practice manager tier. The partner sees the override reason. The firm CFO sees the practice forecast.

Pricing committee prep

Non-standard fee memos, practice side.

The pricing committee prep view with matter scope, fee basis, comparable matter history, and risk-adjusted margin projection lives on the practice manager tier. Partners see the pricing outcome on the matter record. The practice manager routes the memo.

Cross-practice staffing

Capacity view across every practice group.

The cross-practice staffing availability view with every lawyer across every practice group lives on the practice manager tier. Partners see their matter team. The practice manager runs the cross-practice staffing conversation.

Client profitability

Fully-loaded cost analysis, practice tier.

The client-team profitability view with fully-loaded cost against realized revenue over a 24 month window lives on the practice manager tier. Partners see their matter billing and matter margin. The practice manager runs the quarterly client review on the practice tier.

Firm managing partner view

The shared record both open on Monday.

The firm managing partner weekly review opens with a shared record both the practice manager and the firm managing partner see. Partners see their matter workspace. The practice manager and the firm managing partner see the practice-level roll-up.

Lateral pipeline

Lateral candidate conversations, practice side.

The lateral candidate pipeline with book size, practice group fit, origination credit projection, and compensation ask lives on the practice manager tier. The firm managing partner and the practice manager run the lateral conversation on the shared record. Partners see the lateral once the hire closes and the practice adds a new member.

Head-to-head

Strkr for law firm practice managers vs the Elite plus Excel plus InterAction stack.

A typical Am Law 100 to 500 practice manager runs the group across Elite or Aderant for billing and utilization, InterAction or ContactEase for firm-wide CRM, Excel for matter forecast rollup, SharePoint for pricing memos, and a weekly meeting with the firm managing partner where the practice manager reconstructs the week from memory. Strkr collapses that into one workspace with practice utilization dashboard, native matter forecast rollup, pricing committee prep view, cross-practice staffing availability, and client-team profitability.

What matters Strkr Elite + InterAction + Excel + SharePoint
Number of surfaces for the Monday review 1 (Strkr) 5 to 6 (Elite, InterAction, Excel, SharePoint, email, meetings)
Utilization latency Daily sync from practice management system 15 day lag at month close
Matter forecast Native hierarchical forecast with submit-lock and override Google Sheet summed from 20 partner emails
Pricing committee prep 20 minute memo from pre-loaded prep view Half-day memo build across 4 tools
Cross-practice staffing Shared view of capacity across every practice group Three email threads per staffing conversation
Client profitability Native 24 month fully-loaded cost against realized revenue Two day Elite report build on managing partner ask
Firm managing partner review Shared Monday record both parties open Sunday night reconstruction from memory
Lateral candidate tracking Native pipeline with origination credit projection Email thread with firm managing partner
Matter budget burn alerts Monday digest of matters past burn threshold Partner tells practice manager at matter review
Partner forecast override Native override with reason captured and partner visibility Phone call to the partner reconciling the number
Quarterly client review Shared record with expand, maintain, review, exit recommendation Google Sheet nobody trusts
Admin burden Practice group operations generalist runs the workspace Elite admin, InterAction admin, Excel keeper, SharePoint owner

See the CRM law firm practice managers actually run the group out of.

Start a trial with the full practice manager stack enabled: practice utilization dashboard with daily sync, native matter forecast rollup with submit-lock, pricing committee prep view, cross-practice staffing availability, client-team profitability analysis, lateral candidate pipeline, matter budget burn alerts, and firm managing partner Monday review prep. One workspace, one shared record, and a Monday that opens on data instead of a Sunday night reconstruction.

See pricing Explore the forecast
Common questions

Law Firms Practice Managers buyer FAQ.

How does the practice utilization dashboard sync with Elite, Aderant, or Centerbase?

Strkr syncs daily from the firm practice management system (Elite, Aderant, Centerbase, Clio Manage for smaller firms) with billable hours per lawyer, matter time entries, and matter billing rolled into the practice utilization dashboard. The practice manager opens Monday morning with the Friday hours already synced, the four-week trailing average per lawyer, the projected year-end utilization against the annual target, and a flag when a lawyer drops below the practice threshold. The course-correction staffing conversation lands in week 2 of the month instead of week 2 of the next month at month-close report. The firm practice management system remains the system of record for billing and matter accounting. Strkr adds the practice manager operational layer on top.

Can Strkr replace Elite or Aderant for billing and matter management?

Strkr does not replace Elite, Aderant, Centerbase, or Clio Manage as the system of record for billable hours, matter billing, invoice generation, trust accounting, or firm financial reporting. Those systems remain in place for the firm billing team and firm CFO. Strkr adds the practice manager operational layer: practice utilization dashboard, matter forecast rollup, pricing committee prep, cross-practice staffing visibility, client-team profitability analysis, and firm managing partner Monday review. The firm consolidates five practice-manager-facing surfaces (InterAction, Excel, SharePoint, email, memory) into one with daily sync from the practice management system.

How does the pricing committee prep view handle a non-standard alternative fee arrangement?

A deal moving to Proposal with a non-standard fee arrangement (AFA, retainer past the size threshold, discount past the approved band, matter type outside standard) fires a Strkr Flow that drafts the pricing committee prep view. The view renders the matter scope on the Products module (phased deliverables, timekeeper roles, hours per role, blended rate, retainer), the fee basis and the delta from the standard rate card, the comparable matter history (last 3 to 5 similar matters with realized revenue and realized margin), the originating partner commentary, the practice group approval status, and the risk-adjusted margin projection. The practice manager routes to the pricing committee with the memo pre-loaded in 20 minutes. The pricing committee reviews on the shared record. The partner sees the pricing outcome on the matter record. The firm never finds a non-standard commitment in a signed engagement letter after the fact.

How does cross-practice staffing availability actually work with 10 to 20 other practice groups?

Every practice group updates lawyer staffing availability weekly (associates and senior associates update utilization and matter-type preferences, practice managers overlay the group-level view). The cross-practice staffing availability view renders every lawyer across every practice group with current utilization, projected utilization over the next 90 days, matter-type experience (M and A, litigation, tax, employment, IP, real estate, bankruptcy), partner-team preferences, and language and geographic coverage. A practice manager staffing a complex matter opens the view, filters by matter-type experience and availability, and routes a cross-practice staffing request to the relevant practice managers with the matter scope and role attached. The staffing conversation lands in one meeting instead of three email threads over three days.

How does client-team profitability analysis work across a 24 month window?

The client-team profitability view on the account record renders fully-loaded cost (associate rates, partner rates, paralegal rates, firm overhead allocation at the firm-set rate, lateral hire integration cost where applicable) against realized matter revenue (invoiced revenue minus write-offs minus write-downs plus realized margin on AFAs) over a 24 month window. The quarterly client review opens with the client profitability tile, the matter mix per client, the partner relationships per client, the cross-practice coverage, and the recommended action (expand with a new practice group pitch, maintain, review for fee increase at the next engagement, exit at next matter close). The practice manager runs the quarterly client review with the firm managing partner on the shared record instead of a 2 day Elite report build on the managing partner ask.

Does Strkr promise any specific state bar fee-arrangement or trust-accounting compliance?

Strkr ships retainer version control, fee arrangement approval workflow, matter scope audit trail, role-aware record visibility, and an audit log on every record change. These are policy tools the firm configures to support internal fee-arrangement review and the firm ethics-reviewed workflow for fee arrangements, retainer agreements, and trust-accounting policies. Strkr does not provide legal ethics advice, and the firm General Counsel or Ethics Committee should confirm the policy configuration matches the firm obligations under the state bar rules, fee-arrangement rules, trust-accounting rules, and client engagement letters that apply. The approval workflow and audit log are configurable surfaces the firm uses to codify the review process. The ethics determination remains with the firm.

Also considering

Related combinations.

For Law Firm Partners For Law Firm Business Development For Law Firm Associates For Law Firm Marketing Managers For Consulting Firm Managing Partners For Professional Services Sales Managers

Try it free. Bring your team next week.

No sales call, no migration consultant, no four-month implementation. Enter your card, get 14 days of the full Pro tier, cancel any time before day 14 with zero charge. Spin up a workspace, import your CSV, and have something useful before lunch.

Start free trial See pricing