How does Strkr handle deal registration for a channel partner program?
Every deal registration carries a request status (submitted, approved, declined, expired), protection window (configurable per tier, typically 90 days Silver, 180 Gold, 365 Platinum), reseller discount tier, approved AE, and attribution rules on the deal record. A submitted deal registration fires a flow that matches the requested account to the CRM, pulls the partner history, surfaces the registration on the partner manager Monday view with a 48 hour SLA, writes the decision to the deal, and notifies the partner contact with the specific reason on declines. Direct AE pursuit of a registered account fires a flow that surfaces the conflict on the AE Monday view with the specific partner, the protection expiry, and the escalation path. The partner principal trusts the program because the decision cadence is reliable and the protection window is enforced.
How does the co-marketing fund tracker work for MDF programs?
The co-marketing fund tracker renders the budget allocated per partner per quarter, requests submitted and approved, pipeline attributed per play, cost per lead, and ROI per MDF dollar. An approved MDF request fires a flow that creates the co-marketing play on the partner record, deducts the budget from the partner MDF balance, routes drafts to the SaaS marketing team, schedules the launch, and attaches the pipeline attribution rule for leads sourced through the play. The partner manager approves the next request with the ROI of the last three plays visible instead of approving blind. Finance pulls the MDF payout CSV from the record every quarter instead of reconciling against a Google Sheet.
How does the SPIFF ROI engine measure lift versus baseline?
A SPIFF object carries program dates, incentive math (per registered deal, per closed-won, double for new logos), partner enrollment, deals attributed, lift versus baseline, cost per incremental deal, and payout schedule. The baseline math pulls prior-period registered deals, closed-won conversion, and new-logo mix for the enrolled partners. The SPIFF-period numbers compare against the baseline so lift is explicit (not just raw deal count). The partner manager sees cost per incremental deal, incremental revenue, and payback period on the SPIFF record. A SPIFF program ending fires a flow that assembles the lift math, exports the payout schedule to finance, notifies the enrolled partners with their earned amount, and routes the retrospective pre-read for the next SPIFF design.
How does the tier qualification engine work for Silver, Gold, Platinum partners?
The tier qualification engine renders each partner against the tier thresholds (revenue, certified reps, deals registered, renewal rate, co-marketing commitment) with the next-tier gap and the current-tier anniversary. A partner approaching the tier anniversary fires a flow that renders the current tier qualification math, surfaces the partner on the manager Monday view, drafts the tier decision pre-read, and schedules the review call with the partner principal. Tier changes carry a reason code and an audit trail. The partner principal sees the gap to the next tier on the shared portal and runs the right plays to close it instead of chasing a Slack DM for a status update.
Can Strkr track ISV partners and channel partners as separate programs?
Yes. Strkr runs a native Partner object with program type (ISV, channel reseller, VAR, MSP, distributor, referral), tier, engagement cadence, attribution rules, revenue share, and co-marketing budget configurable per program. The ISV program drives integration deals, co-sell revenue, and marketplace attribution on its own pipeline. The channel program drives reseller discount deals, deal registration, SPIFF payouts, and MDF draw-downs with its own tier qualification engine. The two programs run as parallel scoreboards at QBR instead of blending into a single Partner dropdown with a text field. The partner manager defends ISV revenue and channel revenue as two separate motions with their own ROI math.
Why not just use PartnerStack, Allbound, and Salesforce together?
PartnerStack handles referral tracking and partner payouts well, Allbound handles the partner portal and certification tracker, Salesforce holds the deal records, and Crossbeam handles account mapping. The problem is five tools, five logins, five attribution models, and five places where partner-sourced pipeline drifts out of the forecast. Strkr collapses the partner workspace, deal registration, MDF tracker, SPIFF engine, tier qualification, certification tracker, and shared partner portal view into one surface with a native Partner object. The partner QBR auto-assembles from the record, finance pulls the MDF and SPIFF payout schedule from the engine, and the partner manager runs the full program with one bill. For a mid-market SaaS partner team of 2 to 6 managers, the consolidation saves five to seven per-seat lines and a week of QBR archaeology per quarter.