Built for sales teams running multi-channel outbound
The sales engagement tool that lives in the CRM instead of being a parallel system you reconcile every Friday.
Sales engagement platforms (Outreach, Salesloft, Apollo, Groove) solved the problem of "my reps need to run sequences at scale" by building a parallel CRM. Ten years later every team is paying for the engagement system, the CRM, the analytics, and nothing reconciles. Strkr runs sequences, email, SMS, LinkedIn, and engagement analytics inside the CRM on the flat per-seat tier.
Sales teams running engagement platforms (Outreach, Salesloft, Apollo, Groove) share a cluster of pain. The engagement platform owns the outreach cadence; the CRM owns the deal; the dialer is often a third vendor; the analytics are siloed. The SDR runs 70 touches a day across 4 systems and the AE never sees the full engagement history. The six pains below are the pattern on every call.
The parallel-CRM tax
Outreach is a 32-dollar-per-user line on top of the CRM.
Outreach Enterprise and Salesloft Premier run in the 100 to 200 dollar per user per month range for the sales engagement surface alone, on top of the CRM license. For a 40-SDR plus 20-AE team the engagement platform is a 60 to 120K per year line that overlaps substantially with the CRM. Strkr runs the engagement surface inside the CRM on the flat per-seat tier, which eliminates the overlap.
Reconciliation lag
The engagement history in Outreach does not show up in the CRM for 2 hours.
Sync lag between the engagement platform and the CRM runs 15 minutes to 2 hours typically. During that window the AE opening a deal sees a stale engagement history. Strkr runs engagement natively in the deal record so the latest touch is visible instantly. The reconciliation lag is zero because the data is not duplicated across systems.
Dialer is a third vendor
Aircall, Dialpad, and RingCentral each a separate seat.
The dialer is often a third system (Aircall, Dialpad, RingCentral, Kixie) with its own seat cost, its own integration, its own analytics. The call outcome lives in the CRM, the sequence state lives in the engagement platform, and nobody has one view. Strkr keeps the dialer vendor as an external integration (log call outcomes against the deal record via webhook or manual disposition) and ships every other engagement channel (email, SMS, LinkedIn, tasks) natively on the same record. Native voice is on the Strkr Messaging roadmap for 2027-Q1.
LinkedIn automation is a compliance risk
Dux-Soup and PhantomBuster are a LinkedIn ban waiting to happen.
LinkedIn aggressively bans accounts that run automated connection requests and InMail. The gray-market automation vendors (Dux-Soup, PhantomBuster, Expandi) deliver scale but carry account-ban risk. Strkr integrates with LinkedIn Sales Navigator through the compliant Sales Navigator API where it exists, surfaces LinkedIn touches in the deal record, and does not automate the actions that LinkedIn bans. The approach is slower but durable.
SMS is a parallel system
Reps run SMS through personal phones or a 4th vendor.
SMS as a sales channel grew fast in 2023-2024 and most engagement platforms treat it as a bolt-on. Reps end up running SMS through personal phones (which creates compliance and audit gaps) or through a standalone SMS tool with its own seat line. Strkr Messaging runs SMS natively inside the engagement workflow with A2P 10DLC registration handled, STOP and HELP keyword enforcement, and the full audit trail attached to the deal (2 cents per SMS segment, 5 cents per MMS).
Analytics are siloed
Reply rate in Outreach, meeting rate in Salesforce, dialer connect rate in Aircall.
The engagement funnel analytics (touches sent, replies received, meetings booked, opportunities created) span 3 or 4 systems and nobody can run a clean report without a data warehouse. Strkr runs the full engagement funnel in one tenant with the per-sequence, per-template, per-rep performance visible without a data engineering project.
What sales engagement needs to do
The capability checklist for a modern multi-channel outbound motion.
The capability list below is what a VP of sales plus RevOps lead ask for when they shop for sales engagement software. Each card walks through one capability with the operational question it answers.
Multi-step sequences
Email, SMS, LinkedIn, phone, task touches in one cadence.
A sequence covers email touches, SMS touches, LinkedIn touches, phone touches, and manual tasks across a day-schedule. Strkr sequences handle all five touch types with conditional branching based on reply, open, bounce, meeting-booked state. The sequence runs on the lead record so the engagement history is complete.
Phone outcomes on the record
Call dispositions and notes attached to the deal.
The rep logs call outcome, disposition, and notes against the deal record from the Strkr UI (or via webhook from an integrated dialer). Strkr AI drafts the follow-up email and next-step task from the disposition and notes. Native voice (click-to-call, recording, auto-transcription) is on the Strkr Messaging roadmap for 2027-Q1; today the dialer stays external and the outcomes land in the CRM.
Strkr Messaging
SMS natively in the sequence with 10DLC compliance.
SMS runs natively inside the sequence with A2P 10DLC brand and campaign registration handled by Strkr Messaging, STOP and HELP keyword enforcement, and the audit trail on the deal record. Pricing is 2 cents per SMS segment and 5 cents per MMS. The compliance posture satisfies US SMS regulations without the rep running SMS through a personal phone or a fourth vendor.
LinkedIn integration
Sales Navigator sync with compliant surfaces.
Strkr integrates with LinkedIn Sales Navigator for lead data pull, InMail tracking, and connection-request status via the compliant Sales Navigator API where it exists. Strkr does not run the gray-market automations that LinkedIn bans, which keeps the sales team's accounts intact over time.
AI drafting for every touch
Email, SMS, and LinkedIn drafted from deal context.
Strkr AI drafts email, SMS, and LinkedIn messages with the lead context, the deal context, and the sequence stage attached. The rep edits in 20 seconds versus writing from scratch in 2 minutes. Draft time saving at 70 touches per day per SDR translates to roughly 2 hours per rep per day back.
A/B test infrastructure
Template performance split-tested at scale.
Strkr runs sequence A/B tests at the template level: two versions of the same step with traffic split, performance tracked on reply rate, meeting rate, and opportunity rate. The A/B infrastructure runs inside the normal sequence rather than requiring a separate campaign setup.
Strkr runs the full email deliverability stack: dedicated sending domains per tenant, SPF/DKIM/DMARC alignment verified, 60-day warm-up on new domains, engagement-based sending to protect sender reputation. The deliverability posture holds at the 180-day mark where most engagement platforms degrade.
Reply-detection accuracy
Out-of-office vs real reply classified correctly.
The engagement platform has to classify replies: real reply (continue conversation), out-of-office auto-reply (do not treat as reply), bounce (suppress). Strkr's reply detection runs at 97 percent accuracy on the standard reply types, which is high enough to trust the sequence to pause on real replies rather than firing step 3 at a prospect who already asked for the demo.
Full-funnel analytics
Touches to replies to meetings to opportunities in one view.
Strkr surfaces the full engagement funnel in one dashboard: touches sent per rep per week, reply rate per template, meeting rate per sequence, opportunity rate per sequence, closed-won rate per original sequence. The funnel analytics run on CRM data rather than a side-system export, which eliminates the Monday morning spreadsheet reconciliation.
How SDRs and AEs run Strkr engagement
The daily rhythm with engagement inside the CRM.
The cards below walk through the typical daily cadence for an SDR, an AE, and a sales manager running Strkr engagement. The cadence covers task queue, sequence operation, call block, and the manager pipeline review.
SDR morning task queue
Prioritized touches with context attached.
The SDR opens Strkr Monday morning and the task queue surfaces 70 touches for the day: 32 email steps across 4 sequences, 18 LinkedIn connection requests, 12 call steps, 8 manual research tasks. Each task carries the lead context, the sequence stage, and the AI-drafted content pre-populated. The SDR works the queue in 30-minute batches with the AI drafts cutting touch time in half.
Call block with CRM-logged outcomes
12 outbound calls, logged with dispositions and AI-drafted follow-ups.
The SDR runs a dedicated call block from 10 to 11:30 AM. Dial from the integrated dialer (or desk phone), log the disposition and notes against the deal record in Strkr, and Strkr AI drafts the follow-up email and the next-step task from the notes. The SDR works through 12 calls in 90 minutes with structured outcomes on every deal, instead of a stack of unlogged calls and 2.5 hours of catch-up notes. Native voice (click-to-call, recording, auto-transcription) is on the Strkr Messaging roadmap for 2027-Q1.
AE discovery call
Full engagement history before the call opens.
The AE preparing for a 2 PM discovery call opens the lead record. The full engagement history is visible: 11 touches across 3 weeks, 2 replies, 1 connect call, 7 pages of a landing page viewed, Sales Nav profile data. The AE walks into the call with context rather than reading the SDR's hand-off note cold.
Reply handling with AI draft
Reply lands, Strkr AI drafts the next-step response.
A prospect reply lands in the SDR's queue. Strkr AI reads the prospect reply, the sequence context, the lead context, and drafts a response that handles the objection or question. The SDR edits in 20 seconds and sends. Reply-to-send time drops from 4 minutes to 25 seconds, which keeps the conversation hot.
Manager pipeline review
Pipeline plus engagement correlation.
The sales manager runs the weekly pipeline review Monday. The dashboard surfaces pipeline health plus engagement correlation: specific SDRs whose touch volume is high but reply rate is low, specific AEs whose discovery-to-opportunity rate is lagging. The 30-minute review surfaces 2 to 3 coaching conversations with specific data to anchor each.
Template performance review
A/B test winners rolled to the full sequence.
The RevOps lead runs the weekly template performance review Thursday. The dashboard surfaces the A/B test results from the week: which subject lines won, which call openers converted, which LinkedIn connection messages got accepted. Winning variants roll to the full sequence by Friday. The improvement cadence compounds at 1 to 3 percent per week.
Deliverability review Friday
Sender reputation and inbox-placement check.
The RevOps lead runs the weekly deliverability check Friday. Sender reputation scores for each tenant sending domain, inbox-placement test results across Gmail, Outlook, Yahoo, carrier blacklist status. The 5-minute check catches degradation signals early rather than after a bad Monday blast lands in Promotions.
What this is not
The limits for engagement-platform buyers.
A sales engagement platform inside the CRM is not a drop-in replacement for every specialty vendor in the stack. The cards below are where Strkr complements rather than replaces.
Outreach Enterprise has specific primitives tuned for very large sales organizations (100+ SDR teams with centralized revops teams). The deepest Outreach workflow surfaces (admin templates, cross-org reporting, specific SLA primitives) outpace Strkr for the 500+ SDR seat count. For teams at or below 100 SDRs, Strkr handles the full engagement motion plus the CRM in one tenant.
Not a dedicated call-coaching platform
Gong and Chorus run call-recording and conversation intelligence.
Gong and Chorus run the deeper call-recording-plus-conversation-intelligence surface with specific features for coaching, deal risk detection, and competitive-mention tracking. Strkr's native dialer with AI summary covers the common cases. Teams running heavy call-coaching motions should keep Gong or Chorus for the depth and integrate with Strkr for the CRM side.
Not a data provider
ZoomInfo and Apollo (as a data provider) are the enrichment layer.
Lead enrichment data comes from ZoomInfo, Apollo (the data product, not the engagement product), Clearbit, 6sense, Cognism. Strkr integrates with the chosen data provider to pull firmographic and contact data into the lead record but does not try to replace the data product itself.
LinkedIn automation we will not do
The gray-market LinkedIn automation stays off the roadmap.
Dux-Soup, PhantomBuster, Expandi, and similar tools automate LinkedIn actions in ways LinkedIn's terms of service prohibit. Strkr will not add equivalent automation. The approach is slower outbound on LinkedIn but durable account health, which is the right trade for most teams running Sales Navigator seats worth 125 dollars per month each.
Voice is not native yet
External dialer today, Strkr Messaging voice on the 2027-Q1 roadmap.
Strkr does not ship a native dialer today. Teams running outbound phone keep their current dialer (Aircall, Dialpad, RingCentral, or a desk-phone setup) and log outcomes against the Strkr deal record. Strkr Messaging voice (click-to-call, recording, auto-transcription, AI call summary) is on the roadmap for 2027-Q1. US and Canadian coverage ships first; international coverage will be scoped at that time.
Open API, not Zapier middleware
First-class integrations with the engagement stack.
Strkr integrates with LinkedIn Sales Navigator, ZoomInfo, Apollo (data), 6sense, Clearbit, Gong, Chorus, DocuSign, and the common SaaS billing tools through first-class API integrations. The engagement workflow does not route through Zapier middleware; the native integrations handle the state transitions, data pulls, and event triggers with the right error handling.
Head-to-head
Strkr vs Outreach for sales engagement.
Outreach is the most-asked-about engagement platform in sales-engagement evaluations. Here is the head-to-head on the capabilities sales teams care about most.
Feature
Strkr
Outreach (Enterprise)
CRM scope
Engagement plus full CRM in one tenant
Engagement overlay on Salesforce or HubSpot
Sequence capabilities
Email, SMS, LinkedIn, phone, task with conditional branching
Deep sequence capabilities, industry-leading
Native dialer
External dialer today, native voice on 2027-Q1 roadmap
Dialer available, often paired with separate vendor
SMS native
Strkr Messaging with 10DLC registration handled
SMS add-on or integration
AI drafting
Strkr AI drafts every touch (AI Enhancement module, 49 USD per month)
Strong Outreach-side reporting, CRM reconciliation separate
Pricing basis
Flat per-seat with engagement and CRM included
100 to 200 dollars per user per month plus CRM license
How teams use Strkr
How sales teams run Strkr engagement today.
The common thread: the engagement motion runs inside the CRM on one record, which eliminates the parallel-system tax. Playbooks below are live customer motions.
Series B SaaS, 24 SDRs plus 12 AEs
Consolidated Outreach plus Salesforce into Strkr, saved 150K per year.
A Series B SaaS team ran Outreach Enterprise plus Salesforce for the engagement motion plus a separate dialer line. The combined annual spend across the engagement and CRM vendors was 210K. The consolidated Strkr tenant handles sequences, CRM, email, SMS, and LinkedIn on the flat per-seat tier at 60K annual, which saved 150K. The team kept their existing dialer and now logs outcomes to the Strkr deal record. The migration took 5 weeks including SDR training and sequence rebuild. Reply rate and meeting rate held within 5 percent of prior performance.
Mid-market B2B, 40 SDRs
AI drafting cut SDR touch time by 55 percent.
A mid-market B2B team enabled Strkr AI drafting across all SDR sequences. Average touch time dropped 55 percent against the prior Salesloft baseline. The SDRs ran 95 touches per day versus 60 at the prior cadence, which added 1,400 extra touches per week across the team without increasing hours. Reply rate held, which was the goal: the AI drafts had to be as good as the SDR's manual versions to protect quality.
High-velocity SMB, 18 SDRs
A/B test cadence drove 23 percent reply-rate improvement in Q2.
A high-velocity SMB team ran weekly A/B tests on sequence openers in Strkr. The Thursday performance review surfaced 2 to 3 winning variants per week that rolled to the full sequence by Friday. The compounding improvement across 12 weeks drove a 23 percent reply-rate improvement against the Q1 baseline. The test cadence was not possible on the prior stack because the data layer was split across engagement platform and CRM.
Enterprise B2B, 85 SDRs plus 40 AEs
Full engagement history visible to AE before every discovery call.
An enterprise B2B team ran Strkr engagement with full history surfaced to the AE before every discovery call. The AEs started referencing specific engagement signals in discovery (specific landing-page views, specific prior objections handled by the SDR) within 2 weeks of adoption. Discovery-to-opportunity conversion improved 18 percent against the prior Outreach-plus-Salesforce stack where AEs had to hunt for engagement context.
Agency, 24 BDRs representing 7 clients
Per-client tenant with deliverability stack kept inbox placement at 93 percent.
A B2B outbound agency runs 24 BDRs across 7 client accounts. Each client runs in a separate Strkr tenant with dedicated sending domains, independent sender reputation, and client-specific sequences. Inbox-placement tracking across all 7 tenants held at 93 percent average over 6 months, versus 71 percent on the prior shared-infrastructure engagement platform. The deliverability improvement was the single biggest driver of improved reply rates across client campaigns.
Sales engagement that lives in the CRM, not a parallel silo.
See how Strkr runs sequences, email, Strkr Messaging for SMS, LinkedIn integration, A/B testing, and full-funnel analytics inside the CRM on the flat per-seat tier (Strkr AI drafting available as an add-on module).
What is the best tool for managing sales engagements in 2024-2025?
The right choice depends on the SDR scale, the integration posture, and the tolerance for parallel systems. For teams at or below 100 SDR seats who want engagement plus CRM in one tenant, Strkr handles the full motion on the flat per-seat tier. For teams at 500+ SDR seats with centralized revops organizations and specific enterprise-workflow requirements, Outreach Enterprise and Salesloft Premier carry deeper enterprise primitives. For teams prioritizing lead data over engagement workflow, Apollo (the data-plus-engagement product) is a different trade. The common 2024-2025 pattern is engagement-in-CRM as the default plus specialty tools (Gong for call coaching) where the motion demands it.
How does Strkr handle multi-step sequences across email, SMS, LinkedIn, and phone?
Strkr sequences handle all touch types in one cadence with conditional branching. Email steps go through the deliverability stack (dedicated sending domains, SPF/DKIM/DMARC). SMS steps run through Strkr Messaging with 10DLC compliance. LinkedIn steps surface in the task queue with Sales Navigator context attached for the rep to execute compliantly. Phone steps hit the native dialer with click-to-call. Each sequence step can condition on reply, open, bounce, meeting-booked, or custom field state. The full engagement history lands on the lead record so the AE picking up the deal sees everything.
Does Strkr ship a native dialer, and how does it fit with Aircall or Dialpad?
Not yet. Strkr does not ship native voice today; the dialer stays external. Teams typically keep their current dialer (Aircall, Dialpad, RingCentral) and log call outcomes against the Strkr deal record from the UI or via webhook. Strkr AI drafts the follow-up email and next-step task from the disposition and notes. Native voice (click-to-call, recording, auto-transcription, AI call summary) is on the Strkr Messaging roadmap for 2027-Q1 and will cover US and Canadian outbound first.
Does Strkr do LinkedIn automation like Dux-Soup or PhantomBuster?
No, and this is a deliberate choice. Dux-Soup, PhantomBuster, Expandi, and similar tools automate LinkedIn actions in ways LinkedIn's terms of service prohibit, which carries real account-ban risk. Strkr integrates with LinkedIn Sales Navigator through the compliant API where available, surfaces LinkedIn touches in the task queue for rep execution, and tracks LinkedIn engagement at the lead level. The approach is slower on LinkedIn outbound but keeps the sales team's Sales Navigator accounts (125 dollars per month each) intact over time. Teams that need gray-market LinkedIn automation should keep the specialty vendor.
How does Strkr AI help with sales engagement touches?
Strkr AI drafts email, SMS, and LinkedIn message content with the lead context, the deal context, and the sequence stage attached. For an SDR running 70 touches a day, AI drafting cuts touch time from roughly 2 minutes per touch to 20 seconds per touch, which is a 2-hour-per-day time saving. Strkr AI handles complexity routing automatically so the rep never picks a model or tunes a prompt. AI is an opt-in add-on module (49 USD per month flat, 5,000 Strkr AI calls included) rather than bundled on the per-seat tier.
What is the pricing comparison between Strkr and Outreach for a 40-rep team?
Outreach Enterprise for a 40-rep team (24 SDRs plus 16 AEs) typically lands at 85 to 110K per year for the engagement surface alone, before the Salesforce CRM license (another 60 to 90K per year for Enterprise seats). Strkr handles engagement plus CRM for the same team on the flat per-seat tier at 45 to 60K per year. The combined savings run 100 to 140K per year, which funds specialty tools (Gong for call coaching, ZoomInfo for data) with budget left over. The migration is typically 4 to 8 weeks including SDR training and sequence rebuild.
No sales call, no migration consultant, no four-month implementation. Enter your card, get 14 days of the full Pro tier, cancel any time before day 14 with zero charge. Spin up a workspace, import your CSV, and have something useful before lunch.
We use cookies.
Essential cookies keep the site working. If you accept, we also enable Google Analytics
so we can see which pages help and which don't. Reject to opt out entirely. Details in our
Privacy Policy.
