Can Strkr replace a dedicated PRM like Impartner or Allbound?
For most channel programs under 500 partners on standard reseller, VAR, SI, agency, referral, or affiliate motions, yes. Strkr covers partner records, partner portal with role-aware visibility, deal registration with duplicate detection and account lockout, MDF ledger with approval flows and proof-of-performance, tier scorecards partners see in real time, enablement with assessments and certification expiry, co-sell pipeline with split attribution, partner collaboration threads with Slack sync, and the post-close hand-off to delivery projects. For programs running Impartner for 10-plus years with deeply-customised vendor-professional-services integrations, the migration cost is real and the comparison is less about features and more about switching cost. Strkr has a native partner-data migration path that preserves partner records, tier assignments, open deal registrations, MDF ledger balances, and enablement progress, so the switching cost is quantifiable up front.
How does deal registration work and how does it prevent direct-team poaching?
A partner submits a deal registration from the portal with account name, primary contact, opportunity description, expected ARR, estimated close date, and partner rep. The form runs duplicate detection against the direct pipeline and recently closed-lost records on submission, and the registration lands in the channel-manager triage queue with the duplicate check result and SLA countdown visible. The channel manager approves or rejects with one click, and approval creates a Channel Opportunity record with partner attribution and locks the account for the configured lockout period (default 90 days). Attempts by direct AEs to create a competing opportunity during the lockout fire a notification to the channel manager with the attempted record attached, so poaching gets caught at the attempt instead of at the close.
How is MDF tracked in Strkr and how does the approval flow run?
MDF is a native per-partner budget ledger with annual allocation defined by tier policy. Partners submit requests from the portal with campaign plan, target personas, expected outcomes, budget breakdown, and timeline. Approvals route through flows based on request size and campaign type: under $5K and standard campaigns approve by the channel manager alone, above $5K loop in Finance, above $25K loop in the channel director, and anything with a joint-content commitment loops in Legal. Reimbursement releases on proof-of-performance submission (receipts, actual outcomes, campaign evidence) with the full audit trail intact for compliance review. Pipeline sourced from MDF-funded campaigns tags with the campaign reference so quarterly MDF ROI is a database query instead of a reconstruction project.
How does enablement work and how are certifications tracked?
Enablement is a native library with role-specific tracks for partner sellers, pre-sales engineers, and delivery teams. Each partner contact tracks module completion, assessment scores, certification issue date, and expiry date on a progress record attached to their contact entry. Assessments gate certification, so passing the test is required instead of just watching the video. Certifications carry a 12-month expiry by default (configurable per program), and reminder flows nudge reps approaching expiry so recertification happens before the current credential lapses. The channel manager routes co-sell to certified reps only using the live certification state on the contact record, and the partner-side partner manager sees their own team progress to coach reps through the course.
How does split attribution work on co-sell deals?
Every Channel Opportunity carries a split-attribution rule set per deal, defining the share credited to the partner, the direct rep, and (where applicable) a second partner on technology-alliance deals. Rules can be flat percentages (70-30 partner-direct split) or role-based (partner carries 100 percent of sourced ARR, direct carries 100 percent of expansion ARR on the same account). Forecast rollups surface partner-sourced, partner-influenced, and direct columns distinctly, so the channel VP and the sales VP both see the number that matters to them without a parallel spreadsheet. On Closed Won, the attribution flow runs the comp math and queues the partner-comp payout alongside the direct-rep comp math, so finance pays out on the same cadence.
How does the partner portal handle visibility and policy per partner?
The portal renders role-aware on every record. The channel manager configures visibility rules per partner tier and per field type, so Platinum partners see one surface, new Bronze partners see a simpler onboarding-focused layout, and competitive partners (if the program allows) see only their own records with the broader program context stripped. On the deal record, partner-facing commentary and internal commentary live on the same thread with role-aware filtering, so the channel manager posts internal context without worrying about it leaking to the partner. Document visibility runs on the same model, with per-document role filters for the agreement, order forms, SOWs, and co-marketing collateral.
How does the hand-off from channel deal to joint delivery work?
At Closed Won on a Channel Opportunity, a flow fires that creates a project in Strkr Projects, maps the deal fields (ARR, start date, stakeholders, scope, partner, special terms) to the project template, auto-generates onboarding tasks from the project type, assigns the delivery owner on the Strkr side, tags the partner on the project team with role-aware visibility, and pulls the partner delivery lead into the project collaboration thread. The channel manager no longer writes a hand-off email with the partner CC-d, and the delivery team on both sides starts the project with every signed artifact and discovery note from day zero. Partner delivery leads see the project in their partner portal and the internal delivery lead sees the full context in Projects, with the two views sharing the same record.
Can channel managers run tier upgrades without a quarterly review?
Yes. Tier scorecards run on live data (registered deals in period, closed revenue, certification counts, co-marketing commitments met) and partners see their own scorecard in the portal with the exact remaining ask against each tier criterion. When a partner crosses a threshold, a flow fires the tier-review notification to the channel manager and the partner, so upgrades happen in the week they are earned instead of three months later in the quarterly review. The channel manager can still override (either direction) with a reason code logged to the audit trail, so edge cases (a partner that hit numbers but is in a probation state) stay in the channel manager control.