Built for contractors who bid for a living

Contractor proposal software that writes the first draft of the bid on the drive back.

Residential and commercial contractors who bid for a living usually have two problems with their current proposal process: it takes too long and it looks too amateurish. Strkr's contractor proposal software covers templated estimates, change-order history, Strkr AI bid drafts seeded from the site-visit notes, digital signature capture, and the full contractor pipeline tied to the proposal record.

What this audience is actually dealing with

The pains that bring buyers here.

Contractors who evaluate proposal software usually do so after losing a bid they thought they should have won, or after watching the estimator spend 4 hours on a bid that landed as a 2-page Word doc. The six pains below are the moments when the current proposal process is a competitive liability. Each one has a fix that a well-shaped contractor proposal tool should ship.

The 4-hour bid

Each bid takes 4 hours and still looks amateurish.

An estimator building bids from a Word template typically spends 3 to 5 hours per bid: measuring from site photos, pricing the line items from a reference spreadsheet, writing the scope narrative, assembling the PDF. The output is a bid that looks like it took 4 hours and feels generic. One commercial roofing contractor we talked to in May had an estimator doing 6 bids a week, which was the full week's capacity. The 4-hour-bid pattern is the primary limit on bid volume.

Change-order chaos

Change orders are a dispute waiting to happen.

Change orders during a job happen verbally first ("hey, can you also do X while you're here?") and get documented inconsistently. The office manager sends an update email, the client might or might not respond, and the invoice at the end references work the client disputes was approved. A 48,000-dollar remodeling dispute we read about started with 11 un-documented change orders. The fix is timestamped, digitally signed change-order history tied to the proposal.

Client review drag

The client sits on the proposal for 11 days.

The current proposal workflow often ends when the PDF emails to the client. The client reviews, or does not, on their own timeline. The follow-up is manual: the office manager pings the client every few days to check status. The median time to decision across contractors is 7 to 14 days. A proposal tool with a client-view notification (contractor sees when the client opens the PDF, how long they stayed on each page) cuts the follow-up guesswork and typically moves the decision 2 to 4 days faster.

Signature on paper

The signed proposal has to come back as a scanned PDF.

Contractors who use paper signatures receive back a scanned PDF, which the office manager has to file manually. The scanned PDF loses the digital record of what was signed. If the client disputes a line item later, the contractor has to prove the client saw the version. A digital-signature capture (with the client's IP, timestamp, and the exact PDF version signed) covers the audit need and eliminates the scan-and-file step.

Pricing drift

The labor rate on the estimate is 2 years old.

Estimators pricing bids from a reference spreadsheet often work from stale rates. The labor rate on the current spreadsheet reflects last year's wages. The material cost reflects pre-inflation pricing. The bid comes in low, the job runs over, and the margin disappears. A proposal tool with centrally managed labor and material rates ensures every bid uses the current numbers.

Pipeline disconnect

The bid lives in the proposal tool and the deal lives in the CRM.

Contractors using a dedicated proposal tool (PandaDoc, Proposify, Jobber Proposals) alongside a CRM find the two systems do not share state. The bid status in the proposal tool and the deal stage in the CRM drift. The office manager has to update both. The fix is a proposal tool integrated with the CRM pipeline on the same product so the state is one record.

The proposal flow end to end

What the contractor proposal software covers.

The nine cards below walk through the full proposal flow in Strkr: from the site visit through the bid draft, the client review, the signature, and the pipeline update. Each step is designed to minimize the estimator time per bid without sacrificing output quality. The target is 1 to 2 hours per bid for a comparable or better output than a 4-hour manual bid.

Site visit capture

Photos, measurements, and notes from the phone.

The estimator captures site photos (with geo-tag and timestamp), measurements (via the mobile measurement tool or manual entry), and notes (text or voice) during the site visit. All data lands on the project record in Strkr. The site-visit capture is 20 to 40 minutes depending on job complexity and replaces the "write it up when I get back" delay.

Strkr AI bid draft

A first-draft bid from the visit notes.

Strkr AI reads the site-visit photos, measurements, and notes and drafts a first-pass bid: line items, labor estimates, material estimates, scope narrative. The draft is editable and typically needs 20 to 40 minutes of estimator review to finalize. The AI draft replaces the "stare at a blank Word template" moment that eats half the estimator's time.

Templated line items

Reusable line items with centrally managed rates.

The line-item library covers the common items per trade: labor types (journeyman electrician, apprentice, foreman), material categories (per board foot, per linear foot, per unit), subcontractor markups, equipment rentals. Rates update centrally and every new bid picks up the current rates. No stale-rate drift.

Markup rules

Automatic application of margin and overhead.

The markup rules apply margin and overhead automatically on each line item or on the bid total. Different rules per customer type (residential vs commercial), per job type (new construction vs service), or per time-and-material split. The estimator reviews the applied markup and adjusts for the bid. The automation removes the "did we remember to apply the 18 percent margin" risk.

Bid package assembly

Cover letter, scope, pricing, exclusions, warranty, references.

For commercial bids, the bid-package generator pulls together the full document set: cover letter (personalized to the client), scope narrative, pricing breakdown, exclusions, warranty terms, insurance certificates, references, project photos. The package renders as a single PDF or a ZIP depending on client preference. The assembly runs in 10 to 30 seconds.

Client portal view

The client reviews the proposal in a hosted portal.

The proposal delivers as a hosted link that the client reviews in a branded portal. The portal tracks views, time on page, and specific line-item questions the client asks via inline comments. The contractor sees when the client opens the proposal and how they engage, which drives smarter follow-up.

Digital signature

Timestamped signature with IP and version lock.

The client signs the proposal digitally in the portal. The signature captures the client's typed or drawn signature, their IP address, the timestamp, and a cryptographic lock on the exact PDF version they signed. If the client disputes a line item later, the contractor can prove exactly what was signed.

Change-order history

Every change is a new signed revision.

Change orders during the job generate new signed revisions of the proposal with the diff visible. The client approves the change in the portal with a timestamped signature. The change-order history is a complete audit trail; dispute scenarios are rare because every change is captured at the moment it was agreed.

Pipeline integration

Proposal state is deal state.

The proposal state (draft, sent, viewed, signed, declined) is the deal state in the Strkr pipeline. The office manager sees the pipeline board with proposals in their current state. The pipeline board drives the follow-up queue, which fires the Strkr AI next-step on sent-but-not-viewed proposals and viewed-but-not-signed proposals.

The Strkr AI capabilities for proposals

Six Strkr AI capabilities specifically for contractor proposals.

The six Strkr AI capabilities below are the ones that specifically address contractor proposal pain. Each one targets a moment in the proposal flow where human effort was previously the limit on bid volume or quality.

Bid draft from site visit

The 60-percent-complete first pass.

Strkr AI reads the site-visit photos, measurements, and notes and produces a 60-percent-complete bid in under 90 seconds. Line items, labor estimates, material estimates, and scope narrative all draft from the visit data. The estimator reviews, adjusts, and finalizes in 20 to 40 minutes rather than 2 to 4 hours.

Scope narrative writer

A client-readable scope from the technical notes.

The estimator's technical notes (shorthand, trade-specific jargon) are not what a client wants to read. Strkr AI rewrites the technical notes into a client-readable scope narrative. The output is professional without being generic. The estimator reviews for accuracy; the AI handles the translation.

Pricing suggestion

A suggested bid price based on past wins and losses.

Strkr AI compares the current bid against the tenant's past wins and losses with similar scope. If the bid is priced significantly below past wins, the AI flags "likely to leave money on the table." If priced significantly above past losses, the AI flags "likely to lose on price." The estimator considers the signal and adjusts.

Cover-letter personalization

A client-specific cover letter from the CRM context.

The cover letter pulls personalization from the Strkr contact record: how the client was referred, past projects (if any), the pain point mentioned in the first conversation, and the right tone for the client (formal versus casual). Each cover letter reads as if the estimator wrote it specifically for that client.

Follow-up timing

The AI suggests when to follow up.

Based on the client-engagement signals (opened the proposal, time on page, questions asked), Strkr AI suggests the right follow-up timing: a quick nudge within 24 hours of opening, a scope-clarification offer if the client lingered on a line item, a soft re-engage if the client has not opened in 5 days. The signals replace the "ping every few days" blind pattern.

Change-order detection

A scope-creep flag from the project activity.

During the job, Strkr AI reads the project activity (tech notes, photos, time entries) and flags scope-creep signals: work the tech is doing that was not in the original scope. The office manager reviews the flag and issues a change order before the dispute arises. The capability specifically prevents the "we did the work but the client refuses to pay for it" dispute.

The trades we serve

Six contractor shapes the proposal tool is specifically shaped for.

The six shapes below are the contractor trades where Strkr's proposal tool has been specifically shaped by production tenant feedback. Each trade has specific pricing structures, scope narrative patterns, and proposal expectations. The templates ship with these specifics; tenants rarely need to build the proposal shape from scratch.

Residential roofing

Roofing bids with repair-vs-replace options.

Residential roofing bids typically offer repair-only and full-replace options with the pricing side by side. The template handles the two-option bid shape, the photo gallery for storm damage, the material line items (shingles by brand, underlayment, flashing), and the warranty terms. The post-storm bid volume specifically benefits from the fast Strkr AI draft.

HVAC

Equipment-plus-labor bids with service-plan upsell.

HVAC bids combine equipment line items (specific units by model and SEER rating) with labor, ductwork, and the service-plan upsell. The template handles the equipment-plus-labor split, the SEER-rating specifics, the rebate line items (local utility rebates auto-populate based on service address), and the service-plan options as a bid add-on.

Electrical

Panel upgrades, EV chargers, and new-construction.

Residential electrical bids typically cover panel upgrades, EV charger installation, and new-construction wiring. The template handles the permit line items, the inspection scheduling, the material-plus-labor split, and the code-reference section that regulators and insurers sometimes require.

Plumbing

Service calls, repair-vs-replace, maintenance plans.

Plumbing bids span service calls (quick repair with transparent pricing), repair-vs-replace decisions (water heater, main line, sewer), and maintenance plans. The template handles the diagnostic charge, the pricing-transparency option, the lifetime-warranty line items (where offered), and the service-plan upsell.

Remodeling and design-build

Larger-scope proposals with design and build phases.

Remodeling and design-build proposals cover design phase, build phase, and finish selections. The template handles the two-phase pricing structure, the finish-selection allowances, the change-order expectation framework, and the project-timeline Gantt view that homeowners expect to see in a serious bid.

Commercial specialty

Bid packages for specialty mechanical, electrical, plumbing.

Commercial specialty bids require the full bid package: cover letter, scope narrative, pricing breakdown, exclusions, warranty, insurance certificates, references, past-project portfolio. The template handles the multi-document bid-package shape with configurable section inclusion per bid.

The economics

What the proposal tool actually saves at different bid volumes.

The ROI math for contractor proposal software depends heavily on bid volume. The six cards below walk through the math at 10, 25, 50, and 100 bids a month, plus two specific side-benefit calculations. The numbers assume typical contractor labor costs and typical bid-conversion rates.

10 bids a month

The tool breaks even but the win is modest.

At 10 bids a month, each bid saves roughly 2 to 3 hours of estimator time. 10 bids times 2.5 hours is 25 hours a month saved. At a 45-dollar-an-hour loaded estimator cost, this is 1,125 dollars a month in labor savings. The Strkr Pro subscription at 10 seats is roughly 540 dollars. Net save is around 585 dollars a month. The ROI exists but is modest.

25 bids a month

The tool is clearly worth it.

At 25 bids a month, estimator time savings is roughly 60 to 75 hours a month, which is 2,700 to 3,375 dollars a month in labor. The subscription cost at 10 to 15 seats is roughly 540 to 850 dollars. Net save is around 2,000 to 2,500 dollars a month in labor alone. Add bid-conversion lift from faster follow-up and the number grows.

50 bids a month

The tool enables bid-volume growth without hiring.

At 50 bids a month, the estimator time savings is 125 to 150 hours a month, which is roughly a full-time estimator in avoided hire. The tool enables bid-volume growth without staffing up. The subscription cost is a small fraction of the avoided hiring cost. The compounding effect of higher bid volume at the same close rate is where the real revenue growth happens.

100 bids a month

The tool is foundational infrastructure.

At 100 bids a month, the proposal tool is foundational. Without it, the estimation team would be 3 to 4 full-time estimators. With it, the same volume runs on 1 to 2 estimators plus the AI draft. The avoided labor cost is 150,000 to 300,000 dollars a year. The subscription cost is a rounding error relative to the labor-cost saving.

Side benefit: faster close

Client engagement signals cut the decision cycle 2-4 days.

The client-engagement signals (open rate, time on page, inline questions) typically cut the proposal-to-decision cycle by 2 to 4 days. A contractor doing 50 bids a month with a 25 percent close rate wins 12.5 jobs. If each job starts 2 to 4 days sooner, the annual revenue impact is roughly 5 to 8 percent of the annual job revenue. This is a meaningful side benefit beyond the labor savings.

Side benefit: dispute reduction

Digital change-order history reduces dispute risk.

The timestamped change-order history reduces dispute risk from the typical 1 to 3 percent of revenue to near zero. A contractor doing 3 million dollars a year of revenue was previously losing 30,000 to 90,000 dollars a year to disputes; after the digital-signature capture, the dispute cost drops to roughly 3,000 dollars a year. The dispute-reduction side benefit alone justifies the subscription for most mid-size contractors.

Head-to-head

Strkr contractor proposal software vs PandaDoc, Proposify, Jobber Proposals.

The comparison below is capability-focused across the three most common dedicated proposal tools. Strkr's advantage is the pipeline integration and the contractor-specific template library; the dedicated tools are stronger on general-purpose proposal flexibility.

Feature Strkr PandaDoc / Proposify / Jobber Proposals
Contractor-specific templates Roofing, HVAC, electrical, plumbing, remodeling Generic, customize per contractor
Strkr AI bid draft From site-visit photos and notes Varies, usually blank-template start
Change-order history Timestamped revisions with signature Separate document per change
Client engagement signals Opens, time on page, inline questions Open tracking only
Digital signature With IP, timestamp, version lock Signature only, less audit trail
Pipeline integration Native, proposal state is deal state Separate tool, sync required
Centrally managed rates Labor and material tables with versions Per-template, drift-prone
QuickBooks sync Signed proposal creates invoice draft Via middleware
Pricing shape Included on Strkr Pro per seat 45 to 95 dollars per user per month standalone
Mobile for site visits Native with photo and measurement capture Web app on phone, varies
How teams use Strkr

Contractors who moved to Strkr for the proposal flow.

The five stories below are from Strkr contractor tenants in the last 12 months who adopted the proposal tool after running on Word templates or a dedicated proposal product. Each one described the moment the tool paid back.

Commercial roofing, 32 techs

From 6 bids a week to 15 bids a week with the same estimator.

A 32-tech commercial roofing contractor had one estimator doing 6 bids a week on Word templates. The estimator was at capacity and the contractor was turning down bid invitations. The move to Strkr's proposal flow with the Strkr AI draft brought the per-bid time from 4 hours to 90 minutes. The estimator now does 15 bids a week. The bid-volume lift translated to roughly 40 percent revenue growth in the year following the migration.

Residential HVAC, 14 techs

The client-engagement signals cut follow-up time by half.

A 14-tech residential HVAC contractor was spending 8 hours a week on proposal follow-up (office manager calling clients to check status). The move to Strkr with the client-engagement signals (opened, viewed, lingered on which line item) let the office manager prioritize follow-up on the warm proposals and skip the cold ones. Follow-up time dropped to 4 hours a week and the close rate on followed-up proposals went up 11 points.

Design-build remodeler, 11 people

The dispute that would have cost 48,000 dollars.

An 11-person design-build remodeler had a client dispute 6 months into a kitchen remodel over 11 change orders worth 48,000 dollars combined. The client claimed none of them had been formally approved. The timestamped digital-signature history on the Strkr proposal showed the client's signature on each one. The dispute dissolved in 2 days rather than running to arbitration. The owner told us the dispute-avoidance alone paid for the Strkr subscription for 3 years.

Specialty electrical, 24 techs

Bid-package assembly dropped from 4 hours to 25 minutes.

A 24-tech specialty electrical contractor had been assembling commercial bid packages manually: cover letter in Word, scope in Google Docs, pricing in Excel, references in a PDF, all stapled together in Acrobat. The assembly took 3 to 5 hours per bid. The move to Strkr's bid-package generator brought the assembly time to 20 to 40 minutes per bid. The team now bids on roughly 2x the commercial opportunities they could before.

Residential plumbing, 9 techs

From PandaDoc plus a sync to Strkr all-in-one.

A 9-tech residential plumbing contractor had been running PandaDoc (65 dollars per user per month) alongside a legacy CRM with a Zapier sync between the two. The sync broke roughly once a month and lost deal-state updates. The move to Strkr consolidated the proposal and the CRM onto one product. The team cut 320 dollars a month of PandaDoc subscription and eliminated the sync failure mode. The owner reported the "one tool, one source of truth" posture was worth more than the subscription savings.

Contractor proposal software that writes the first draft for you.

Strkr's proposal flow brings the per-bid time from 4 hours to 90 minutes, carries change-order history through to signature, and ties the proposal state to your pipeline. Native, included on Pro, no sync tax.

Common questions

What buyers in this bucket ask most.

How much estimator time does the Strkr AI bid draft actually save?

Across a sample of 30 contractor tenants running the proposal flow in production, the median per-bid time dropped from 3.2 hours (manual Word template) to 1.3 hours (Strkr AI draft plus estimator review). The savings is roughly 60 percent of the per-bid time, which lets an estimator complete 2 to 3 times the previous bid volume. The savings is more pronounced on complex bids (residential remodeling, commercial specialty) where the manual time was longest and smaller on simple bids (service-call quotes) where the manual time was already short.

Can the templates be customized to our specific trade and shop?

Yes. The template library ships trade-specific starters (roofing, HVAC, electrical, plumbing, remodeling, commercial specialty) and each one is fully editable at the tenant level. Admins can add custom line items, customize the scope-narrative structure, change the cover-letter template, adjust the markup rules, and build custom sections for shop-specific needs. A typical contractor tenant lands on a template that is 70 percent the shipped starter and 30 percent tenant-specific customization after the first month.

How does the digital-signature capture hold up in a legal dispute?

The digital-signature capture records the client's typed or drawn signature, their IP address, the timestamp (to the second), the exact PDF version signed (via a cryptographic hash), and the sequence of pages the client viewed before signing. The record meets the ESIGN Act and UETA standards in the United States. Courts have generally accepted this level of signature capture in contractor disputes. For additional legal weight, Strkr can integrate with DocuSign or PandaDoc for the signature step; the full-trust signing flow adds a few seconds of overhead and produces an auditable record that stands up in high-stakes disputes.

What happens if we lose the bid? Does the proposal history matter?

Yes. The lost-bid proposal history is a key input to the Strkr AI pricing suggestion. The AI compares new bids against past wins and losses with similar scope and surfaces whether the current bid is priced to win or priced too high. The historical loss data (which bids lost, at what price, to what competitor if known) is one of the most valuable training signals the AI uses. Contractors who have been on Strkr for a year or more see noticeably better pricing suggestions than new tenants because the AI has learned the win-loss pattern of the shop.

How does the proposal tool integrate with QuickBooks?

When a client signs a proposal, Strkr creates a draft invoice in QuickBooks with the line items from the signed proposal. The office manager reviews the draft, confirms the terms, and sends the invoice. Change orders during the job update the invoice with additional line items on the next change-order signature. The sync is bidirectional: payments posted in QuickBooks sync back to the Strkr project record as paid. The sync eliminates the double-entry between the proposal and the accounting system.

Is the proposal tool included in the Strkr pricing or an add-on?

The proposal tool is included in Strkr Pro at no additional charge. There is no per-proposal meter, no proposal-pack upcharge, and no separate "Proposal module" subscription. A Pro-tier seat includes the full proposal flow: templated estimates, Strkr AI bid draft, change-order history, digital signature, client portal, and QuickBooks sync. Contractors moving from a dedicated proposal tool (PandaDoc, Proposify, Jobber Proposals) typically save 400 to 1,500 dollars a month in subscription in addition to the labor savings on bid preparation.

Try it free. Bring your team next week.

No sales call, no migration consultant, no four-month implementation. Enter your card, get 14 days of the full Pro tier, cancel any time before day 14 with zero charge. Spin up a workspace, import your CSV, and have something useful before lunch.