A CRM for insurance brokers that recognizes a policy is not a deal and renewals do not negotiate.
Insurance brokerages run on an agency management system (Applied Epic, Vertafore AMS360, EZLynx, HawkSoft, QQCatalyst) that holds policies, carriers, premium data, and commission records. The CRM side (new-business pipeline, cross-sell tracking, client retention playbooks, marketing automation) typically runs on a separate tool or on nothing at all. Strkr fills the CRM-side gap with a REST + GraphQL API, outbound webhooks, and scoped tokens for wiring the AMS to the CRM so one record carries the full relationship including policy details.
Insurance brokerages face a specific software stack problem: the agency management system is operational system of record (policies, premiums, commissions, carrier reports) but was not built as a client relationship tool. The producer's daily motion (prospecting, cross-selling, renewal retention, service tickets) runs across the AMS plus a general CRM plus various sales tools, with the integration between them typically poor. Below are the six specific friction patterns we hear from brokerage principals and operations leads evaluating alternatives.
The AMS plus CRM dual-system reality
Policies live here, pipeline lives there.
Applied Epic, Vertafore AMS360, and the other agency management systems hold policies, premium data, carrier information, and commission records. The pipeline and the cross-sell motion run on either nothing (producer notebooks) or on a general CRM that does not natively integrate with the AMS. The producer's daily tool-switching tax is real: open the AMS for policy details, open the CRM for pipeline, open Outlook for email, open the carrier portal for quoting.
Renewal calendar sprawl
2,000 clients, 4,000 policies, 365 renewal dates.
A typical mid-sized brokerage has 1,500 to 3,000 commercial clients with multiple policy lines each. Policy renewals are 30, 60, or 90 days before expiration. Missing a renewal costs the client and the carrier commission. The renewal calendar in the AMS is accurate but the follow-up workflow (did we quote renewal, did we present, did we bind) typically runs on spreadsheets or producer memory. The retention-rate variance across producers is a direct reflection of this.
Carrier commission reconciliation
Direct bill vs agency bill vs sweep.
Commission payment flows differ by line (P&C direct bill vs agency bill, benefits per employee per month vs commission flat, life first-year vs renewal commissions). Monthly commission reconciliation across the AMS, the carrier statements, and the agency's GL involves line-by-line matching of carrier remittance against expected commission. Variance resolution is the single biggest ops time sink at most brokerages.
E&O compliance posture
Errors and omissions is the brokerage's existential risk.
Insurance brokers carry errors-and-omissions (E&O) liability for every policy they place. Documentation of what was quoted, what was presented, what was recommended, what the client accepted or declined, and when each action occurred is the E&O defense. Agency management systems carry policy transaction records; the pre-binding advisory conversation often lives in email, text, or producer notes that never make it to the system of record.
Cross-sell opportunity capture
Benefit broker refers to P&C, never happens.
Multi-line brokerages (brokerages that place both commercial P&C and employee benefits for the same client) have specific cross-sell opportunities: the group benefits broker sees the business owner's need for key-person life insurance; the P&C commercial lines broker sees the client's need for cyber coverage. Without a structured cross-sell workflow, the referral conversation happens in hallways or does not happen. Revenue leakage is substantial.
The producer compensation model
Producer commission splits are the daily operational question.
Insurance producer compensation runs on commission with splits that vary by producer (new producer vs tenured), by book (own book vs house book), by line (commercial vs personal), and by role (lead producer vs service). The compensation calculation runs monthly or quarterly against the commission ledger. Producers who feel the compensation calculation is opaque spend time questioning rather than selling, which is a specific operational drag.
What Strkr's insurance configuration ships
Policies, renewals, carriers, commissions on the CRM.
The Strkr insurance configuration is a tenant-level setting that unlocks the insurance-specific object model, workflows, and AMS integrations. The cards below describe what ships beyond the baseline CRM.
Policy record
Line, carrier, premium, dates, commission.
Each policy is a first-class record with policy number, line of business (commercial auto, GL, workers comp, cyber, EPLI, D&O, business owners, group medical, group dental, group life, individual life, personal auto, home, umbrella), carrier, effective and expiration dates, premium, commission rate, and the linked client and producer. Policies carry endorsement history and claim history where sync from the AMS supports it.
Renewal pipeline
Every policy on a renewal calendar.
The renewal pipeline surfaces every policy approaching renewal with the appropriate stage based on days-to-expiration: 120 days out (strategy review), 90 days out (begin remarketing), 60 days out (quote comparison), 30 days out (client presentation), 15 days out (bind decision), 7 days out (binder confirmation). Each stage has producer owner, service owner, and operations oversight visible. The renewal pipeline is the operations lead's daily dashboard.
Carrier management
Appointments, submissions, and quote tracking.
Each carrier record carries the brokerage's appointment status, the lines appointed for, the carrier's underwriting contacts, the carrier portal links, the submission requirements, and the quote-turnaround history by line. Submission tracking shows which carriers quoted on which risks with the quote amounts and the appetite feedback. Carrier-performance analytics (quote-hit ratio, premium competitiveness, service responsiveness) rolls up for the carrier-appointment review conversations.
AMS integration via open API
Applied, Vertafore, EZLynx, HawkSoft, QQCatalyst.
Strkr's open REST + GraphQL API, outbound webhooks, and scoped tokens let a brokerage wire Applied Epic, Vertafore AMS360, EZLynx, HawkSoft Agency Platform, or QQCatalyst to the CRM for bidirectional policy, client, and commission sync. The AMS remains the system of record for policy and premium data; Strkr adds the CRM-plus-workflow surface. Reference connectors for the major AMS platforms are on the integrations roadmap; agencies on the API path today build the sync in a sprint with the OpenAPI spec and a scoped token.
Commission tracking
Producer splits with the ledger.
Commission tracking runs on the AMS-synced commission data with producer split rules configured per producer per book per line. The producer dashboard shows YTD earned commission, pending commission (bound but not yet received from carrier), expected commission (quoted but not yet bound), and the specific policies behind each number. Monthly commission statements generate automatically with the producer-level breakdown and the carrier-level roll-up for the operations review.
E&O compliance audit log
The documentation defense for every policy.
Every client-advisory conversation (quote presentation, coverage recommendation, policy decline, coverage waiver) logs with timestamp, user, content, and the client acknowledgment where captured. The E&O audit log for a specific policy shows the full documentation chain from first prospect conversation through binding. For firms with annual E&O insurance renewals, the audit-log sample typically contributes to a measurable renewal rate improvement.
Cross-sell workflow
Opportunity routing between benefit and P&C teams.
When a client's profile suggests a cross-sell opportunity (business owner with no key-person life, commercial client with no cyber coverage, group medical client with no voluntary benefits), the cross-sell workflow surfaces the opportunity to the appropriate specialist producer. The handoff carries the client context, the specific coverage gap identified, and the recommended next step. Cross-sell commission attribution flows to both the originating and receiving producers per the configured rules.
Client service tickets
Policy change requests with SLA tracking.
Client service requests (certificate of insurance, endorsement, claim notification, billing inquiry, policy question) route into a service queue with SLA tracking (standard 24-hour turnaround, same-day for binders, 4-hour for claim notification). The service CSR works the queue with the policy context available. Policies with high service-ticket volume surface as retention-risk flags for the producer to proactively address.
Marketing and prospecting
Industry-specific outbound and content.
Insurance-specific outbound targeting (by industry code, by employee count, by current carrier via trade-association data, by premium band) runs with sequencing tuned to insurance decision cycles (annual renewal windows, new-business formation triggers, M&A event triggers). Content library includes insurance-specific collateral (coverage comparisons, carrier overviews, claim scenarios) with the appropriate state-approved disclosures where regulatory requirements apply.
The operations motion
What the daily ops lead actually gets done.
Brokerage operations leads run a specific daily motion that spans renewal management, carrier management, commission reconciliation, and compliance review. The six items below are the specific operational motions Strkr compresses.
Daily renewal review
The 120-60-30-day cadence runs automatically.
Each morning the renewal dashboard shows: policies entering the 120-day strategy stage, policies entering 60-day remarketing, policies at 30-day presentation, policies at 15-day bind decision, and policies at 7-day confirmation. The ops lead reviews each category, confirms producer assignments, and flags escalations. The daily review that previously consumed 90 minutes runs in 30 minutes with the categorization automatic.
Weekly carrier submission review
Which carriers quoted, which did not respond.
The weekly carrier submission review shows all open submissions by carrier, by line, by producer, with quote-turnaround metrics and non-response flags. Carriers that consistently miss turnaround get the production-management conversation. Carriers quoting outside appetite get the underwriting-feedback loop. The brokerage's carrier relationships stay healthy through structured follow-through rather than ad-hoc producer complaints.
Monthly commission reconciliation
Expected vs received, variance resolved.
Monthly commission reconciliation runs the AMS commission ledger against carrier remittance statements with variance flagging per policy. Common variance types (short-payment due to policy change not yet remitted, missing commission on a specific binding, incorrect commission rate applied) surface with the specific carrier contact for resolution. The 3 to 5 day monthly reconciliation sprint runs as a half-day effort with the variance queue surfaced automatically.
Quarterly producer compensation
Statement generation with split-rule clarity.
Producer compensation statements generate quarterly with each policy earning commission, the applied split rule, the resulting producer earning, and the YTD totals. Producers see their own statements with the specific policy breakdown. Questions about compensation shift from "I think I was shorted on something" to "specifically on this policy, the split calculation shows X; is that right?" which is a measurably different conversation.
E&O annual review
The documentation sample for the policy renewal.
The brokerage's own E&O liability policy renews annually with the underwriter typically requesting a sample of client advisory documentation. The E&O audit log generates the required sample (typically 20 to 50 random policies with the full documentation chain). The sample that previously required a 2-week pull-and-prepare effort generates in a 2-hour review. Brokerages running the structured documentation sometimes see E&O premium reductions at renewal.
Carrier appointment review
Annual carrier roster evaluation.
The annual carrier appointment review evaluates each carrier appointment against production (premium bound, loss ratio, commission earned, quote-hit ratio), service quality, and strategic fit. The analytics support the keep/exit decisions and the appointment-expansion conversations with carriers performing well. The specific review that previously relied on producer sentiment runs on data.
The brokerage categories
Where Strkr fits across insurance brokerage types.
Insurance brokerages vary meaningfully across lines, markets, and compensation models. The six items below describe the common brokerage types and how Strkr specifically fits each.
Commercial P&C brokerage
Business insurance with 300 to 2,000 clients.
Commercial P&C brokerages handling GL, workers comp, commercial auto, cyber, EPLI, D&O, umbrella, and specialty lines benefit specifically from the renewal pipeline (middle-market commercial accounts typically have 90-day renewal cycles), the carrier-submission tracking (multiple carrier quotes per risk), and the cross-sell workflow (business owner personal lines, key person life). The AMS integration (Applied Epic typically) remains for policy of record.
Employee benefits brokerage
Group medical, dental, vision, life, voluntary.
Employee benefits brokerages running group benefits (medical, dental, vision, group life, group disability, voluntary benefits) benefit from the annual renewal pipeline with the 180-day pre-renewal strategy window, the carrier-market analysis, the enrollment-season workflow, and the ongoing service-ticket management across benefit types. The compliance posture (ACA reporting, ERISA fiduciary, state continuation) layers on the compliance surface.
Life and annuity brokerage
Individual life, estate planning, annuity sales.
Life and annuity brokerages running individual life, universal life, variable life, term life, fixed and variable annuities benefit from the long-cycle sales motion (18 to 36 month cultivation for high-net-worth placements), the carrier-illustration tracking, and the specialized compliance posture (FINRA for variable products, state insurance for fixed, specific suitability review for annuities). The FINRA compliance layering specifically differentiates this brokerage type.
Personal lines agency
Home, auto, umbrella at consumer scale.
Personal lines agencies with 500 to 10,000 personal auto and home policies benefit from high-volume renewal management, carrier-portal integration (Progressive Agent, Travelers for Agents, Nationwide), and the client service queue for routine CSR work. The specific operational pattern is high-volume lower-dollar policies where the volume economics matter more than the per-policy depth.
Specialty program broker
Industry-specific program insurance.
Specialty program brokers (program business specifically for industries like trucking, restaurants, construction, non-profits, condo associations) benefit from the program-structure overlay: a program is a packaged offering with specific coverage structure, specific carrier appointments, specific underwriting criteria, and specific target client profile. Program-level reporting and the sales-and-marketing motion by program fit the specialty broker pattern.
Hybrid broker-agent operation
Mixed captive and independent markets.
Some operations run as hybrid broker-agent, representing a specific captive carrier (State Farm, Allstate, Farmers, Nationwide, Erie, American Family) for the majority of business while writing specialty or hard-to-place risks through independent markets. The hybrid pattern requires the CRM to support both the captive-carrier primary motion and the independent-market overflow motion. Strkr's multi-carrier flexibility handles both without requiring separate systems.
Head-to-head
Strkr vs AgencyBloc or Agency Management System CRM add-ons.
The common comparisons for brokerages evaluating CRMs are AgencyBloc (standalone insurance CRM), Applied Epic's CRM module, Vertafore CRM, and horizontal CRMs retrofitted with insurance customization. Here is the honest head-to-head.
Feature
Strkr
AgencyBloc / AMS CRM modules
Policy as first-class record
Native policy object with line, carrier, premium, dates
Three operational motions below show up repeatedly on brokerage customers. Each represents a specific capability where the Strkr insurance configuration specifically fits the brokerage motion.
32-producer commercial P&C brokerage
Retention rate rose from 86 to 92 percent in year one.
A 32-producer commercial P&C brokerage with roughly 1,800 clients had been running Applied Epic for policy of record with no CRM-side tool. The retention rate across lines ran at 86 percent, which the principal attributed partly to inconsistent renewal preparation across producers. On Strkr with the renewal pipeline configured, every policy entered the appropriate stage at the appropriate time, every producer saw their renewal dashboard daily, and the operations lead could escalate stuck renewals rather than discovering them post-expiration. Year-one retention rose to 92 percent across the book. The specific producer-level variance that had been 78 to 94 percent narrowed to 89 to 95 percent, which the principal described as the single most measurable operational improvement of the year.
18-producer benefits brokerage
Cross-sell revenue grew 2.4x in 18 months.
An 18-producer employee benefits brokerage had been struggling with cross-sell between the benefits producers and the P&C side of the firm (a 2-producer P&C unit the firm had added 3 years earlier). Cross-sell revenue sat at roughly 180,000 USD annually, which the principal considered 5x below potential. On Strkr with the cross-sell workflow configured (coverage-gap detection on client records, specialist-producer routing, commission split rules for the originating and receiving producers), cross-sell revenue grew to roughly 440,000 USD annually over 18 months. The specific operational change was that benefits producers saw the P&C coverage gaps on their client records (business owners without key-person life, group clients without voluntary benefits, etc.) with the referral workflow one click away.
8-person specialty broker
Trucking program with 400 fleets on structured renewal.
An 8-person specialty broker running a trucking program with roughly 400 fleet accounts had been struggling with the renewal calendar: each fleet had multiple policies (commercial auto, GL, workers comp, cargo, physical damage, umbrella) with staggered renewal dates. The producer memory on which policies on which fleets renewed when was becoming unreliable at scale. On Strkr with every policy on the automated renewal pipeline and the program-level structure (every trucking fleet gets the same coverage review, the same carrier submission motion, the same client-presentation flow), the operational burden stabilized. The firm added roughly 60 fleet accounts in the first year post-implementation without adding operational staff.
45-producer regional brokerage
E&O premium reduction at renewal.
A 45-producer regional brokerage with 4,500 clients across commercial, benefits, and personal lines had been carrying E&O at roughly 180,000 USD annual premium. The E&O underwriter at the annual renewal typically requested a sample of policies with the documentation chain for review. Pre-Strkr, this request required 2 to 3 weeks of pulling documentation from Applied Epic, Outlook, producer notebooks, and shared drives. On Strkr with the structured E&O audit log, the documentation sample generates in a 2-hour review. The underwriter cited the documentation quality improvement at the renewal and reduced the E&O premium by roughly 11 percent, which translated to roughly 20,000 USD annual savings. The specific operational detail: the underwriter reviewed the audit log directly rather than requesting the firm compile a sample package.
12-producer life and annuity firm
FINRA compliance posture integrated with the sales motion.
A 12-producer life and annuity firm placing variable products (variable universal life, variable annuities) runs under FINRA with the standard suitability review requirements, 3120 and 3130 supervisory responsibilities, and trade retention under FINRA Rule 17a-4. The firm had been running the sales motion on a general CRM and the compliance posture on a separate compliance management tool, with the two systems disagreeing on which recommendations had completed suitability review. On Strkr with the FinServ configuration applied, the suitability review workflow integrates into the sales motion: a product recommendation cannot advance to presentation until suitability review completes with the required documentation. The compliance officer and the sales motion stayed aligned without the previous reconciliation effort.
A CRM for insurance brokers that fits the brokerage reality.
Start a 14-day free trial with the insurance configuration enabled: policy records, renewal pipeline, carrier management, AMS integration (Applied, Vertafore, EZLynx), commission tracking, E&O audit log, cross-sell workflow, service queue. If you are migrating from AgencyBloc or an AMS-native CRM, we build a migration preview with your real data within 72 hours.
Does Strkr integrate with my agency management system?
Yes. Native integrations include Applied Epic (via the Applied Developer API with policy, client, commission, and transaction sync), Vertafore AMS360 (via the AMS360 Open API), EZLynx (via the EZLynx Rating Engine and Communication Center APIs), HawkSoft Agency Platform, and QQCatalyst. The integration keeps the AMS as the system of record for policy and premium data; Strkr adds the CRM-plus-workflow surface. The field mapping configures per field with the common patterns pre-configured and the specific firm-level customization added during implementation. For brokerages running newer AMS systems (Vertafore BOLT, EZLynx on their newer architecture), the integration patterns similarly supported. For firms running older AMS systems that lack full API coverage, a CSV-based sync pattern provides periodic synchronization though less real-time than the API-based integration.
How does Strkr handle commission tracking across producers and carriers?
Commission tracking runs on the AMS-synced commission data with producer split rules configured per producer, per book (own book vs house book), per line, and per transaction type (new business vs renewal). The producer dashboard shows YTD earned commission, pending commission (bound but not yet received), expected commission (quoted but not yet bound), and the specific policies behind each number. Monthly commission statements generate automatically with the producer-level breakdown. Variance resolution against carrier remittance statements runs on the monthly commission reconciliation workflow with the common variance types (short-payment, missing commission, incorrect rate) surfacing per policy. For brokerages with complex split rules (sliding splits based on production, override commissions for sales management, carrier-specific override overrides), the split rules configure in the admin UI with the appropriate priority ordering.
How does the E&O audit trail work?
Every client-advisory conversation and policy transaction logs with timestamp, user, content, and the client acknowledgment where captured. The E&O audit log for a specific policy shows the full documentation chain: first contact, discovery notes, coverage recommendation, carrier submissions, quote presentation, client decision, binding, policy issuance, endorsements, service tickets, and renewal activity. For firms with annual E&O insurance renewals, the audit-log sample typically contributes to measurable renewal rate improvement. The specific documentation types that E&O underwriters commonly request (coverage-waiver documentation, declined-recommendation records, pre-binding advisory emails) all retain with the appropriate structure. For firms with specific state regulatory requirements beyond the general pattern (specific state DOI documentation standards), the audit log structure adapts to the state requirements.
Can Strkr replace AgencyBloc?
For most brokerages, yes. AgencyBloc is a well-featured insurance-specific CRM with specific strength in employee benefits brokerages. Strkr covers the same specific feature set with broader coverage of multi-line brokerages (commercial P&C, personal lines, specialty program), stronger AMS integrations (specifically with Applied Epic for commercial brokerages), and typically lower total cost. The specific features where AgencyBloc has deeper functionality are the benefits-specific enrollment workflow at the enterprise benefits level and the specific ACA reporting workflow for benefits brokerages at scale. For most mid-sized brokerages (5 to 50 producers), the Strkr insurance configuration covers the operational motion. For firms with specific AgencyBloc feature dependencies, the migration conversation addresses whether those dependencies are business-critical.
What about state insurance regulatory compliance?
State insurance regulatory requirements vary by state and by line of business. The common compliance surfaces that extend into the CRM: NAIC Model Rule 300 (state insurance information privacy), state producer licensing requirements with license renewal tracking, state continuing education requirements, state-specific advertising review for insurance products, state Department of Insurance filing requirements for program business, and state surplus-lines compliance for surplus-lines brokers. Strkr's compliance posture configures per state with the appropriate workflow rules. For brokerages operating in multiple states, the state-specific rules enforce at the appropriate transaction level. For specific regulatory requirements beyond the general pattern (specific state DOI filing requirements, state-specific unfair-trade-practice compliance), the configuration adapts with firm-specific review.
What is the migration path from AgencyBloc or an AMS CRM?
The migration tool pulls clients, policies (active and historical), producers, commissions, service tickets, renewal history, and documentation from AgencyBloc via the AgencyBloc API or from AMS-native CRM modules via the respective AMS API. The policy data preserves the full history (effective dates, premium adjustments, endorsements, cancellations) for the retention period the firm needs for E&O defense and regulatory review. Producer split rules migrate with the AgencyBloc configuration preserved. Service tickets migrate as closed tickets with the resolution history; open tickets migrate as active items on the Strkr service queue. Most migrations complete in 4 to 12 weeks for firms up to 40 producers, with a 2 to 3 week parallel-running period before cutover. The specific work that extends timelines is custom-field reconciliation (every AgencyBloc environment has 20 to 60 custom fields with inconsistent conventions, which is usually a cleanup opportunity rather than a one-to-one migration) and AMS-integration coordination.
No sales call, no migration consultant, no four-month implementation. Enter your card, get 14 days of the full Pro tier, cancel any time before day 14 with zero charge. Spin up a workspace, import your CSV, and have something useful before lunch.
We use cookies.
Essential cookies keep the site working. If you accept, we also enable Google Analytics
so we can see which pages help and which don't. Reject to opt out entirely. Details in our
Privacy Policy.
