Built for investment management firms

CRM for RIAs, wealth managers, and asset management firms.

Investment management firms run on books of business, scheduled client reviews, and strict compliance obligations around communications and recommendations. This page covers the CRM shape for RIA, wealth, and asset management teams and the compliance posture they need.

What this audience is actually dealing with

The pains that bring buyers here.

Investment management firms run on relationship and regulatory discipline. The failure patterns in generic CRM deployments for this industry cluster around five specific gaps that an industry-aware configuration addresses.

Book-of-business gaps

The advisor cannot see their book at a glance.

An advisor managing 180 households needs a unified view of client assets, review schedule, trailing twelve months of touches, and compliance flag status. Generic CRMs scatter this across tabs and reports. The advisor spends 30 minutes assembling the view that should be one dashboard.

Review cadence slippage

Annual review schedules drift into Q4 panic.

The compliance program requires annual reviews with every client. Without a system to track and schedule, half the reviews slip to Q4. December becomes a review marathon that compromises quality. A review-cadence tracker surfaces slippage at month 3, not at year-end.

Communications archiving

FINRA WORM requirements are met by a separate tool.

The firm meets FINRA Rule 17a-4 requirements through Smarsh, Global Relay, or Mimecast. Communications flow through those systems. The CRM is a parallel source. The archiving solution and the CRM are not integrated, creating duplicate record keeping and inconsistent lookup paths.

Portfolio platform split

The custodian or portfolio system is a different world.

Portfolio data lives in Orion, Addepar, Tamarac, Schwab PortfolioCenter, or similar. CRM data lives separately. Advisors swivel between the two for every client interaction. A unified view requires integration that most generic CRMs did not design for.

Compliance review burden

Approval workflows and documentation are manual.

Investment recommendations, communications to clients, and marketing collateral require compliance review. Generic CRMs capture the record but not the approval workflow. The compliance officer runs separate email threads and tracker spreadsheets. The audit trail is fragmented.

Prospecting versus book management

The CRM is optimized for sales or for service, not both.

Advisor firms run two motions: new client acquisition (sales motion) and existing client service (book management). Generic CRMs lean toward one or the other. The industry-aware configuration supports both motions on one platform with distinct workflows for each.

The book-of-business view

What advisors need to see for every client.

The core advisor view surfaces the book: client households, assets under advisement, review schedule, touch history, and compliance status. The view replaces the mental model that otherwise lives in the advisor memory and spreadsheets.

Household record

The primary unit of the book.

Investment management organizes around households, not individuals. A household includes the primary account holders, trust accounts, retirement accounts, education savings, and related entities. The household record aggregates assets, review status, and relationship history. Advisors see the whole picture, not fragments.

Assets under advisement

Current AUA from the custodian or portfolio platform.

The household record shows current AUA sourced from the integrated portfolio platform. The number updates on the integration cadence (typically daily). Advisors see current state without logging into the portfolio tool. The AUA trend over trailing 12 months shows at a glance.

Client tier

Service model varies by tier.

Clients classify by tier (platinum, gold, silver) based on AUA, complexity, or strategic value. Each tier has a service model: platinum clients get quarterly reviews and quarterly outreach, silver clients get annual reviews. The tier drives the review cadence and the resource allocation.

Review schedule

The next review date on every household.

Every household has a next-review date based on the service model. The advisor dashboard surfaces reviews due in the next 60 days. Reviews slipping past target date flag for intervention. The schedule drives the week; the week drives the quarter.

Touch history

Trailing 12 months of interactions.

Every call, email, meeting, and compliance touch logs to the household record. The trailing 12 month view shows interaction frequency and type. Low-touch households (one or two touches a year on a platinum tier) flag for intervention. The touch count correlates with retention; the data informs the service plan.

Compliance flags

Open compliance items on the household.

Open compliance items (pending review, missing documentation, suitability concerns) flag on the household. The compliance team sees the open-item backlog across the firm. Advisors close the items in the normal workflow rather than treating compliance as a separate process.

Deposit and withdrawal activity

Recent net new money and distributions.

Deposit activity (new contributions, rollovers) and withdrawal activity (distributions, planned income) surface on the household. Significant movements flag for advisor attention. Clients making unusual withdrawals get a proactive call instead of a surprise.

Household map

Family members and related entities.

The household map shows family members, trust relationships, business entities, and generational connections. Multi-generational wealth transfer planning benefits from the complete relationship map. The map is updated during review conversations and persists across advisor transitions.

Advisor team

Primary and secondary coverage.

Each household names a primary advisor plus any secondary advisors (associates, specialists). Access rules let the primary advisor see full detail and secondary advisors see appropriate scope. Household handoffs during advisor transitions follow a documented workflow.

Compliance posture

What investment management firms need beyond general SOC 2.

Investment management compliance scope extends beyond general SOC 2 to include SEC and FINRA obligations around recommendations, communications, and recordkeeping. The CRM is one piece of the compliance stack; the specifics below describe what Strkr covers and what the complementary systems handle.

SOC 2 posture

Type II in progress through 2026-Q4.

SOC 2 Type II audit is in progress through the fourth quarter of 2026. Readiness evidence is available in advance of attestation. The posture satisfies the common vendor security review in investment management firms.

Communications archiving

Through complementary tools.

FINRA Rule 17a-4 WORM archiving typically runs through Smarsh, Global Relay, or Mimecast. The archiving tool captures communications across email, chat, and social. Integration patterns to flow CRM-logged communications into the archive are documented. The CRM is not a WORM archive; it integrates with one.

Recommendation tracking

Suitability and best interest documentation.

The CRM captures investment recommendations with the suitability documentation (client objectives, risk tolerance, financial situation, time horizon). The compliance review workflow attaches to each recommendation. Audit trails cover the full lifecycle from recommendation to approval to client acceptance.

Reg BI and fiduciary scope

Workflow support for compliance obligations.

Regulation Best Interest (Reg BI) and advisor fiduciary obligations require specific documentation at the recommendation level. The CRM workflow prompts for required fields at the right stages (such as reasonable basis documentation, conflict disclosure acknowledgment). The compliance team reviews from a dashboard rather than reconstructing from scattered records.

ADV and Form U4

Advisor and firm filings supported.

Advisor Form U4 updates, ADV filings, and state registration records are typically handled through a dedicated compliance platform. The CRM does not replace these systems but supports the data flow (advisor roster, firm hierarchy, licensed state coverage) that feeds them.

Audit trails

Every access logged, exportable.

Audit trails cover read, write, export, and configuration events across the CRM. The logs retain for the duration required by SEC and FINRA (currently 6 years, with 2 years readily accessible). Compliance teams export the audit trail for review on demand.

Supervisory review

Workflow for principal review.

Communications and recommendations requiring supervisory review (principal approval) route through a defined workflow. The principal reviews from a queue; approvals or rejections log with the reviewer, timestamp, and reason. The posture supports FINRA and SEC supervisory requirements.

DPA and data governance

Standard DPA with SCCs for European-adjacent scope.

For firms serving European-adjacent clients, the DPA with SCCs is available at any tier. Cross-border transfer mechanisms covered. Data residency choice (US or EU regions) supports jurisdictional requirements.

Client consent

Opt-in model for marketing communications.

The consent model separates by communication type (service, educational, marketing, research-related). Clients consent per type with the preference center for self-service. The posture meets CAN-SPAM, TCPA, and state-level privacy laws without the generic marketing posture that is often inappropriate for financial services.

Portfolio platform integration

Connecting the CRM to the system that holds the money.

Portfolio platforms (Orion, Addepar, Tamarac, Schwab, Fidelity custody systems) hold the authoritative account and portfolio data. The CRM integrates to surface the data on the household record. The integration patterns below.

Orion

Daily AUA refresh and household mapping.

Standard integration pattern with Orion covers daily AUA refresh at the household and account level, performance metrics, and household composition. The integration surfaces the AUA on the household record and the recent performance in the advisor dashboard. Setup through the Orion API is documented.

Addepar

Multi-custodian aggregation.

Standard integration pattern with Addepar covers consolidated reporting across multiple custodians, which matters for high-net-worth and ultra-high-net-worth households with assets at multiple institutions. The household view aggregates across all tracked custodians through the Addepar API.

Tamarac

Rebalancing and performance.

Standard integration pattern with Tamarac covers rebalancing status, portfolio drift flags, and performance metrics. Advisors see portfolios that have drifted outside tolerance from the CRM dashboard. The service workflow (rebalance, document rationale, communicate) runs on the CRM with Tamarac as the execution system.

Schwab Advisor Services

Direct custodian integration.

Direct Schwab Advisor Services integration covers account open status, daily account values, and transaction activity. The integration surfaces unusual activity (large deposits, withdrawals outside the normal pattern) on the household record for advisor attention.

Fidelity Wealthscape

Advisor platform integration.

Fidelity Wealthscape integration covers advisor-managed account data, performance, and transaction flow. Multi-custodian firms running some portion of their book at Fidelity surface the Fidelity-held accounts on the same household view as other custodians.

Custom integration

For specialty portfolio platforms.

For firms running specialty or proprietary portfolio platforms, custom integration through the Strkr REST API covers the common patterns. The integration pattern (daily AUA sync, transaction flagging, household aggregation) is reusable; the endpoint mapping varies.

The review cycle

How review cadence runs on the CRM.

Scheduled client reviews are the operating rhythm of an advisor firm. The CRM supports the review cycle from scheduling to agenda to documentation to compliance capture.

Scheduling

Reviews auto-scheduled per tier.

Each household review schedules automatically based on the client tier service model. Platinum households review quarterly, gold semi-annually, silver annually. The schedule populates the advisor calendar 90 days ahead. Advisors confirm or reschedule; the system does not force the date.

Agenda preparation

Pre-review packet generated automatically.

Three days before each review, the system generates the pre-review packet: current portfolio value, performance versus benchmark, allocation versus target, outstanding compliance items, recent life events noted in the record. The advisor opens the packet and modifies rather than constructing from scratch.

Meeting execution

Agenda runs through the advisor view.

The advisor runs the meeting from the CRM household view with the pre-review packet open. Notes capture inline. Portfolio changes discussed get flagged for post-meeting execution. The meeting is paperless; the record updates in real time.

Documentation

Review minutes auto-generated.

Strkr AI generates review minutes from the meeting notes and the pre-review packet. The advisor reviews, edits, and signs. The minutes attach to the household and route to the compliance archive. The documentation step is 5 minutes instead of 30.

Follow-up actions

Portfolio changes and client commitments.

Portfolio changes committed during the review flow into the portfolio platform for execution. Client commitments (such as send retirement projection) flow into tasks. The follow-up queue drives the advisor week between reviews.

Compliance capture

Review completion flows to compliance.

Review completion logs with the date, participants, discussion summary, and material changes to the plan. The compliance dashboard reports review completion rate by advisor and by tier. The audit evidence is in place by default rather than reconstructed at examination.

Prospecting alongside service

Running both motions on one platform.

Advisor firms run new client acquisition and existing client service as parallel motions. The CRM supports both with distinct workflows and reporting. Below is the support for each.

Prospect pipeline

New household acquisition tracked by stage.

Prospect households flow through a pipeline with stages: Introduction, Discovery, Proposal, Onboarding. Each stage has required fields and typical duration. The advisor sees their prospecting pipeline alongside their service book. The two motions compete for calendar time; the dashboard makes the trade-off visible.

Referral tracking

Referrals from existing clients.

Referrals link to the source client. Advisors see referral activity by client and by advisor. The analytics surface which clients refer most, which advisors generate the most referrals, and which referral paths convert at the highest rate. The data informs the client appreciation program.

Marketing campaigns

Compliance-reviewed outreach.

Marketing campaigns to prospects route through compliance review before send. Approved templates speed subsequent campaigns. The CRM captures campaign engagement (opens, clicks, replies) at the prospect level and attributes the eventually acquired households back to the sourcing campaign.

Pipeline forecast

Expected close date and value per prospect.

Each prospect household has an expected close date and expected AUA at close. The pipeline rolls up by advisor and by firm. Leadership sees the acquisition pipeline alongside the retention metric. The forecast ritual mirrors a sales organization but with the advisor-specific vocabulary.

Onboarding workflow

From signed agreement to funded account.

The onboarding workflow runs from signed agreement through account opening at the custodian, through initial funding, through welcome materials, through the first review. Each step has an owner and a target completion. Delays flag for intervention. The new client experiences a coordinated onboarding rather than a scattered one.

Service transition

Prospect becomes client, workflow switches.

When a prospect becomes a client, the household moves from prospect pipeline into the service book with the correct tier assignment. The review schedule starts. The service model activates. The transition is a workflow step, not a data migration project. The advisor keeps managing the same household record across the lifecycle.

Head-to-head

Investment management CRM on Strkr versus a generic sales CRM.

The differences between a CRM configured for investment management workflows and a generic sales CRM used by an advisor firm without industry-aware configuration.

Feature Strkr Generic sales CRM at an advisor firm
Primary record Household with family and trust mapping Contact and account, forced-fit
AUA integration Daily refresh from Orion, Addepar, Tamarac, custodian Manual entry or no AUA field
Review cadence Auto-scheduled per tier with pre-review packet Calendar reminders, manual prep
Compliance archiving Integrated flow to Smarsh or equivalent Parallel system, manual coordination
Recommendation workflow Suitability docs, Reg BI, supervisory review built-in Email threads and tracker spreadsheets
Service model by tier Tier drives review and touch cadence Generic contact management
Prospect and service motions Both on one platform with distinct workflows Sales motion only, service in a spreadsheet
Audit trails 6-year retention, exportable for examination Varies, may require add-on
Household map Family and trust relationships first-class Generic contact relationships
Advisor book view Unified book of business dashboard Fragments across reports
Referral attribution Source client linked to acquired household Manual tracking, often lost
Review minutes Strkr AI generated, auto-archived Manual write-up, compliance friction
How teams use Strkr

Investment management firms running on Strkr.

Five patterns from RIA, wealth management, and asset management firms. Each shows the firm shape, the capability, and the measured outcome.

RIA, 12 advisors

Review completion rate climbed from 72 to 97 percent.

A 12-advisor RIA ran a review completion rate of 72 percent in Q1 (reviews slipping to year-end). After adopting the Strkr review cadence with auto-scheduling and pre-review packets, Q2 completion hit 94 percent and Q3 hit 97 percent. The firm met its compliance review requirement without the Q4 marathon.

Wealth management, 25 advisors

Addepar integration consolidated 7 custodians.

A 25-advisor wealth management firm with high-net-worth clients spread across 7 custodians adopted the Strkr-Addepar integration. The household view aggregated across all custodians automatically. Advisors stopped swiveling between 7 custodian portals. Average review prep time dropped from 45 to 12 minutes per household.

Asset management, 8 advisors

Reg BI documentation workflow passed first exam.

An 8-advisor asset management firm with Reg BI scope ran the Strkr recommendation workflow with suitability documentation at every stage. The 2026 SEC examination requested recommendation files for 40 clients. The firm pulled the complete records with suitability documentation, supervisory review, and client acceptance in under an hour. The exam cleared without findings on the recommendation process.

RIA, 18 advisors

Referral tracking surfaced top referrers.

An 18-advisor RIA ran referral tracking for 12 months. The report surfaced the top 10 referring clients across the book. The firm launched a appreciation program for the top referrers (private events, custom reports, direct advisor contact). Referral-sourced AUA grew 34 percent in the following 12 months.

Hybrid firm, 40 advisors

Prospect and service motions on one platform.

A 40-advisor hybrid firm (RIA plus broker-dealer representatives) ran both prospect pipeline and service book on Strkr. Leadership saw acquisition and retention metrics in one dashboard. The quarterly leadership review ran on the combined dashboard instead of 2 separate reports. Advisor time allocation between prospecting and service became visible and manageable.

Run advisor books and prospect pipelines on one platform.

The portfolio platform integrations, the review cadence automation, the recommendation workflow, and the compliance archive integrations are available on every paid Strkr tier. Start a 14-day trial on production infrastructure, or route an investment-management-specific conversation through the sales team.

Common questions

What buyers in this bucket ask most.

Does Strkr integrate with Orion, Addepar, and the major custodians?

Yes. Standard integration patterns are documented for Orion, Addepar, Tamarac, Schwab Advisor Services, and Fidelity Wealthscape. The integrations surface AUA, performance, portfolio composition, and transaction activity on the household record. Setup typically takes 1 to 2 weeks per integration using the first-party connector or the vendor API. For specialty platforms, custom integration through the Strkr REST API covers the common patterns.

How does Strkr handle FINRA communications archiving?

FINRA Rule 17a-4 WORM archiving typically runs through complementary tools like Smarsh, Global Relay, or Mimecast that specialize in regulatory archiving. The CRM is not a WORM archive. Integration patterns flow CRM-logged communications into the archive automatically so the record is captured in both systems with the appropriate retention and immutability properties. Compliance teams see the archive status on the household record.

What is the recommendation and supervisory review workflow?

Investment recommendations capture with the required suitability documentation (objectives, risk tolerance, financial situation, time horizon, Reg BI reasonable basis). Recommendations requiring supervisory review route to a principal queue. The principal reviews, approves or rejects with reason, and the audit trail captures the full lifecycle. The posture supports FINRA Rule 3110 supervisory requirements and SEC Reg BI documentation.

How does the review schedule work for different client tiers?

Each household classifies by tier (platinum, gold, silver, or custom tiers) based on AUA, complexity, or strategic value. The service model per tier defines the review cadence (quarterly, semi-annual, annual). Reviews schedule automatically based on the service model. The advisor dashboard surfaces reviews due in the next 60 days and reviews that have slipped past target date. The tier assignment is admin-configurable to match the firm specific service model.

Can we track prospects and existing clients on the same platform?

Yes. Prospect households flow through a pipeline with stages (Introduction, Discovery, Proposal, Onboarding). Existing client households run in the service book with tier-based review cadence. The transition from prospect to client is a workflow step; the household record continues. Leadership sees acquisition pipeline and service book metrics in one dashboard. The two motions compete for advisor time; making the trade-off visible is part of the value.

Is Strkr suitable for firms with Reg BI scope?

Yes. The recommendation workflow captures the suitability documentation and Reg BI reasonable-basis reasoning at the stages where it is required. Audit trails cover the full recommendation lifecycle. Supervisory review routes through a defined workflow. Firms with Reg BI scope use the CRM for the documentation and workflow; the policy decisions remain with the firm compliance program.

How does Strkr pricing work for investment management firms?

Flat per-seat per-month pricing with Marketing, Projects, and Strkr AI included on every paid tier. The portfolio platform integrations are first-party for the common vendors (Orion, Addepar, Tamarac, Schwab, Fidelity). SSO is included at every paid tier. The DPA is available at any tier for European-adjacent client service. Enterprise tier upgrades apply for firms with specific isolation or compliance scope beyond standard SOC 2 and Reg BI.

Try it free. Bring your team next week.

No sales call, no migration consultant, no four-month implementation. Enter your card, get 14 days of the full Pro tier, cancel any time before day 14 with zero charge. Spin up a workspace, import your CSV, and have something useful before lunch.