Built for teams whose website is the top of the funnel

A CRM where the website visit is a first-class event, not a scrubbed UTM string.

Most CRM-website connections boil down to a form submission and a UTM capture, which strips 95 percent of the signal from the actual visit. Strkr ships native website event tracking, session capture, and form submission handling so a new lead arrives with the pages viewed, the content downloaded, the session duration, and the referral path intact.

Start free trial See pricing
What this audience is actually dealing with

The pains that bring buyers here.

The CRM-website connection is where most funnel attribution math breaks. A form submission arrives in the CRM with name, email, and company, and the sales team has no idea which pages the lead read, how long they stayed, or which content pulled them in. The patterns below are the gaps that undermine the handoff.

The UTM shred

A perfectly tagged campaign loses the detail at form submission.

A paid campaign fires with careful UTM tags. The visitor browses for 20 minutes, downloads a whitepaper, submits a form on the pricing page. The CRM captures the UTM source but strips the browsing path, the downloaded content, and the pricing-page context. Strkr captures the full session plus the UTM so the handoff carries the actual signal.

Form submission is the only event

A 500-visit page with 2 form submissions tells no story.

Most CRMs only know about leads who submit a form, which means 498 of 500 visitors to a high-intent page are invisible. Strkr ships website event tracking that captures anonymous visits with firmographic enrichment where available, so the sales team sees the trending accounts (traffic from Acme Corp spiked this week) even without a form submission.

Session replay lives elsewhere

The CRM has no idea what the lead actually did on the site.

Session replay (FullStory, Hotjar, LogRocket) lives in a separate tool. The AE opens the CRM and sees the form submission; the session replay lives in a tool they do not have access to. Strkr integrates with FullStory and Hotjar and surfaces the session replay link on the lead record. The AE watches the 90-second session before the first call.

Chat conversations lost

The Intercom conversation does not land on the CRM contact.

A visitor chats with the Intercom bot or a human agent, gives their email, and the conversation history stays in Intercom. The AE opening the CRM record sees the form submission but not the three paragraphs of chat context. Strkr integrates with Intercom, Drift, and HubSpot Chat to surface the full chat transcript on the contact record.

Form logic is primitive

Progressive profiling and conditional fields are a different product.

Most CRM-native forms are static (name, email, company, phone, submit). Progressive profiling (ask different questions on return visits), conditional fields, and smart defaults live in a separate marketing-automation tool. Strkr ships form builder with progressive profiling, conditional logic, and native deduplication so a return visit knows what the first visit answered.

Attribution window is a guess

First-touch, last-touch, or something in between.

Most CRMs track one attribution point per lead, which forces an all-or-nothing choice between first-touch and last-touch. Strkr captures every touch across the visitor journey (first visit, return visits, content downloads, form submissions, call bookings) so the attribution model is configurable per team: first-touch, last-touch, linear, or custom-weighted. The marketing team stops arguing with the sales team about which touch gets credit.

The website-to-CRM primitives

What ships when you connect the Strkr tracking script.

The Strkr tracking script is a 12 KB JavaScript snippet added to the marketing site. It captures the primitives below. Each primitive is a distinct data stream and the AE sees all of them on the contact record once the lead becomes known.

Anonymous visit tracking

Every visitor is captured, known or unknown.

Each page view fires an event with session ID, page URL, referrer, device, geo, and firmographic enrichment from reverse-IP lookup where the visitor is on a business network. The anonymous visits accumulate on a workspace-level account record even before the lead submits a form, so trending accounts surface in the ABM view.

Known-lead stitching

Form submission stitches the anonymous history to the lead.

When a visitor submits a form, Strkr stitches the full anonymous session history (every page they viewed, every piece of content they downloaded, every session duration) to the new lead record. The AE opens the lead and sees three weeks of browsing context, which is a better qualification signal than any form-field answer.

Content download tracking

Whitepaper, case study, and demo-video downloads tracked per lead.

Every content download fires an event tagged with the content ID and the download timestamp. The AE sees that the lead downloaded the integration whitepaper on Tuesday and the pricing case study on Thursday, which is the sequence that implies evaluation mode. The content library lives in Strkr or in a connected CMS; the tracking is content-source-agnostic.

Pricing-page intent

A pricing-page visit flags the lead for sales outreach.

Pricing-page visits are the highest-intent event in the funnel. Strkr tags leads with a pricing-page visit flag that routes to the lead-queue surface for immediate SDR outreach. The default rule: pricing-page visit within last 7 days, lead score above threshold, outbound SDR task created within 30 minutes.

Form submission with context

The full field set, the UTM, the page it was submitted from.

Form submissions capture the full field set, the UTM parameters, the page URL where the form appeared, and the time-on-page before submission. The lead arrives in the CRM with the submission context so the AE knows the lead filled out the demo-request form on the pricing page after 8 minutes on the site, which is a very different signal than a 20-second drive-by.

Chat conversation sync

Intercom, Drift, HubSpot Chat transcripts land on the record.

Strkr integrates with Intercom, Drift, and HubSpot Chat to pull chat transcripts onto the contact record automatically. The AE sees the three paragraphs of chat context without opening a second tool. The sync runs real-time via webhook so the AE opens the record and the transcript is already there.

Session replay links

FullStory and Hotjar session links on each visit.

Strkr integrates with FullStory and Hotjar to surface session replay links on the contact record. The AE clicks and watches the actual session before the first call. For teams running session replay internally through Strkr events (page scroll depth, click events), the replay is viewable natively without the external tool.

ABM account aggregation

Anonymous visits aggregate to the target account.

For ABM teams, Strkr aggregates anonymous visits to the target account record via reverse-IP firmographic matching. The ABM view shows which target accounts have been browsing and which pages they viewed, even before a known contact submits a form. The signal routes to the AE assigned to the account.

Attribution recording

Every touch recorded with timestamp and weight.

Each touch (visit, download, form submission, chat, call booking) is recorded with timestamp and the configured attribution weight. The attribution model is configurable per team: first-touch, last-touch, linear, time-decay, or custom-weighted. The marketing-to-sales handoff math stops being a debate because the data is explicit.

The form-building surface

Form builder that respects the inbox and the attribution model.

Strkr ships a form builder as part of the CRM. The forms embed on any marketing site (not just Strkr-hosted pages), handle conditional logic and progressive profiling, and feed directly into the lead-score model. The cards below are the form features that reduce the form-to-lead-to-first-call cycle.

Embed anywhere

JavaScript snippet or hosted-form URL, no CMS lock-in.

Strkr forms embed on WordPress, Webflow, Framer, Astro, Next.js, or any CMS as a JavaScript snippet. For teams that prefer a hosted form, Strkr serves the form on a strkr.io subdomain with the brand kit applied. The forms are not locked to a Strkr-hosted CMS, which is the limitation most CRM-native form builders impose.

Progressive profiling

Return visits see different questions.

The second time a visitor fills a form, Strkr asks different questions. The first form captures name, email, and company; the second asks role and company size; the third asks the problem they are evaluating. The progressive profiling means the lead record fills out over weeks rather than demanding every field on the first interaction.

Conditional logic

Branch the form based on earlier answers.

Conditional logic branches the form based on earlier answers. A visitor who selects "evaluating now" sees a demo-request CTA; a visitor who selects "researching" sees a whitepaper download. The branching is configurable without code and the conditional paths are tracked separately for attribution math.

Deduplication at submit

A new submission from an existing email merges automatically.

Form submissions from an existing email dedupe to the existing contact record. The new fields update the record; the existing fields are preserved unless the admin configures a precedence rule. The dedupe prevents the common pattern of a lead creating three records across three form submissions.

Lead-score integration

Each form field feeds the lead score with configurable weight.

The lead score model consumes form fields with configurable weights. The admin configures the role field to weight VP and C-level higher, the company-size field to weight target-size firms higher, and the problem field to weight ICP-matched problems higher. The score lands on the lead record on submit, which routes the lead to the appropriate queue.

Spam containment

Captcha and firmographic enrichment filter the noise.

Strkr forms filter spam through invisible reCAPTCHA, honeypot fields, and firmographic enrichment that scores suspicious submissions. The admin configures a threshold below which submissions route to the spam queue rather than the sales queue. The pattern cuts spam-driven false SDR tasks by roughly 90 percent compared with raw form intake.

Smart defaults

Known visitors see fields pre-filled.

A known visitor returning to the site sees the form fields pre-filled from the existing record. The visitor edits only what has changed (new role, new company) rather than retyping their name and email on every interaction. The pattern lifts form completion by 30 to 50 percent on known-visitor segments.

Confirmation workflows

Post-submit routing to calendar, content, or thank-you page.

After submit, the form can route to a calendar booking (Chili Piper, Calendly, or Strkr-native scheduler), a content-delivery page, or a custom thank-you page. The routing is configurable per form and per branch within a form. High-intent leads route to a calendar; research-mode leads route to a content library.

Multi-step forms

Long forms broken into tracked steps.

Multi-step forms break long forms (12 to 15 fields) into 3 to 4 steps with progress indicators. Each step is tracked separately for drop-off analysis so the marketing team sees which step is losing leads. The pattern lifts completion rates by 20 to 40 percent compared with a single 15-field form.

The ABM and target-account motion

Website signals that drive the ABM pipeline.

For teams running an ABM motion, the website is the primary intent signal before a form submission. Strkr aggregates anonymous visits to the target account and routes signal to the AE. The cards below are the specific ABM capabilities built on the website event stream.

Target-account surfaces

The AE sees which named accounts browsed this week.

The ABM view in Strkr shows every target account that generated anonymous website traffic in the trailing 7, 30, or 90 days. The AE sees the pages viewed, the session duration, the recurring visitor count. The signal drives the next outbound touch sequence against the account.

Firmographic enrichment

Reverse-IP matching ties anonymous traffic to companies.

Strkr runs reverse-IP firmographic enrichment on anonymous visitors with configurable confidence thresholds. The match rate on business IP ranges is typically 40 to 60 percent, and the ABM view only surfaces matches above the confidence threshold. The remaining anonymous traffic feeds the aggregate volume metric without creating false account signal.

Intent-tier scoring

Visit patterns graded by intent tier.

Each target account visit is scored by intent tier based on the pages viewed. Pricing-page visits score higher than blog-post visits. Integration-detail-page visits score higher than general product pages. The AE sees the intent tier on the account surface, which focuses outreach on the accounts with the strongest buying signals.

ABM campaign alignment

LinkedIn and 6sense campaign IDs match account activity.

Strkr integrates with LinkedIn Ads and 6sense to align campaign exposure with on-site activity. The AE sees that the Acme account received 12 LinkedIn impressions, three ad clicks, and seven pricing-page visits in the last 10 days. The attribution math shows the LinkedIn spend driving the account engagement.

Account notification

AE alerted when a target account spikes.

When a target account's visit volume spikes (3x trailing average, or any pricing-page visit), the assigned AE gets an in-app and email alert. The alert carries the context (which pages, when) so the AE can open a cold-outbound email referencing the exact content the account engaged with. Outbound open rates on these alerts run roughly 3x the cold baseline.

Known-contact alerts

Named contacts browsing surfaces to the AE.

When a known contact (someone with a Strkr record) browses the site, the AE gets an alert with the pages viewed. The pattern is especially useful for post-demo nurture: an AE sees that the prospect from last week returned to the pricing page on Tuesday, which gates a timely re-engagement rather than a scheduled check-in that misses the moment.

Head-to-head

Strkr vs HubSpot for the website-to-CRM connection specifically.

HubSpot has the strongest reputation on the website-to-CRM connection among the mainstream CRMs, which makes it the natural comparison. Here is the head-to-head on the dimensions that matter for a marketing-to-sales handoff.

Feature Strkr HubSpot (Marketing Hub Pro + CMS Hub)
Anonymous visit tracking Captured and aggregated to known records on identification Available in Marketing Hub Pro with limits
Session stitching Full anonymous history stitched to lead on form submission Partial stitch in Marketing Hub Pro
Form builder Progressive profiling, conditional logic, embed-anywhere Progressive profiling in Marketing Hub Pro and above
Content download tracking Per-content download event with timestamp and attribution Content tracked in Marketing Hub assets
Chat conversation sync Intercom, Drift, and HubSpot Chat native sync HubSpot Chat native; others via integration
Session replay integration FullStory and Hotjar links on contact Integration available; not surfaced in contact view
ABM account aggregation Anonymous visits aggregate to target account ABM Hub add-on, higher tier
Attribution model Configurable first, last, linear, time-decay, custom Multiple models in Marketing Hub Pro
CMS lock-in Embed on any CMS via JavaScript snippet Strongest when site hosted on CMS Hub
Pricing basis Website tracking included on every paid tier Marketing Hub Pro add-on, scales with contacts
How teams use Strkr

How teams run the website-to-CRM motion today.

The patterns below are motions that are live on customer accounts right now. The common thread: teams that integrated the website as a first-class CRM surface saw measurable lift on both lead conversion and ABM-account engagement.

28-rep B2B SaaS, ABM-primary motion

ABM-pipeline sourced accounts grew from 60 to 180 per quarter.

A 28-rep B2B SaaS running an ABM-primary motion installed Strkr with reverse-IP firmographic enrichment on anonymous traffic. The ABM view surfaces 180 target accounts per quarter with meaningful on-site engagement, up from 60 under the prior HubSpot-and-6sense setup. The AE team opens outbound sequences against the surfaced accounts with the pages-viewed context attached, which drove the reply rate from 4 percent to 11 percent on cold outreach.

18-rep agency, content-driven inbound

Content-download sequencing fed the SDR pipeline.

An 18-rep agency with a strong inbound-content motion wired every content download into Strkr. Downloads trigger a nurture sequence; three downloads inside 14 days trigger a hand-off to SDR with the download context attached. The SDR opens outreach referencing the downloaded content. Lead-to-meeting conversion lifted from 8 percent to 19 percent on the inbound segment.

42-rep mid-market, pricing-page intent routing

Pricing-page visits route to SDR in under 30 minutes.

A 42-rep mid-market team configured a rule: pricing-page visit by a known contact, SDR task created within 30 minutes. The outbound call reaches the prospect while they are still in-session roughly 40 percent of the time. Meeting-conversion rate on the in-session reach-outs runs 3x the standard scheduled follow-up.

12-advisor RIA, prospecting-form segmentation

Progressive profiling split prospects by assets under management.

A 12-advisor wealth firm uses progressive profiling to segment prospects by assets under management without asking directly on the first form. The second-visit form asks the AUM tier; the third-visit form asks the time-horizon. The advisors route to specialized intake flows based on the segment. The time-to-first-meeting dropped from 11 days to 4 days on the high-AUM segment.

60-rep SaaS, attribution reconciliation

Marketing and sales stopped arguing about attribution.

A 60-rep SaaS team runs linear attribution across every website, email, call, and content touch. The marketing team sees the full touch sequence per closed-won deal; the sales team sees the sourcing touch per deal. The old monthly argument (first-touch vs last-touch) retired because both views are derived from the same event stream, and the exec readout shows both numbers side by side.

A CRM where the website visit is a first-class event.

Start a 14-day trial with the tracking script, form builder, and ABM account aggregation included. Pricing-page intent routing, chat sync, and session replay links on every record.

Start free trial See forms features
Common questions

What buyers in this bucket ask most.

How does Strkr's website tracking compare with HubSpot Marketing Hub or Pardot?

HubSpot and Pardot both ship strong marketing-automation stacks with website tracking as a core piece. The difference is pricing structure and depth of CRM-native integration. HubSpot website tracking lives in Marketing Hub Pro and above, which scales with contact count and can run 1,200 to 4,000 USD per month on top of the CRM license. Pardot pricing is similar at the Advanced tier. Strkr ships website tracking on every paid tier at the flat per-seat price. On capability depth, Strkr covers anonymous visit tracking, known-lead stitching, content download tracking, pricing-page intent, chat sync, session replay links, ABM aggregation, and configurable attribution. HubSpot Marketing Hub Pro covers most of the same ground; Strkr's differentiator is the pricing structure and the CRM-native rendering of the signals (every website event lands on the contact and account record without a separate marketing-hub tab).

What happens to the tracking data when a visitor is anonymous and never submits a form?

Anonymous visits accumulate on a workspace-level anonymous session table with reverse-IP firmographic enrichment where the visitor is on a business network. If the visitor is on a target account IP range, the visits aggregate to the account record so the AE sees the account engagement before a known contact submits a form. If the visitor never becomes known, the visit data stays in the anonymous table and feeds aggregate metrics (total visits by page, by referrer, by target account) but never ties to a person. The anonymous data respects the configured retention policy (default 180 days) and GDPR data-subject-access requests cover the data. We publish the data-handling documentation for compliance review.

Can Strkr's forms replace a dedicated marketing-automation form tool like Marketo or Pardot?

For the common mid-market form patterns (name-email-company-phone, progressive profiling, conditional logic, deduplication, embed on any CMS, lead-score integration, confirmation workflows, spam containment, multi-step forms), Strkr forms replace Marketo and Pardot cleanly. For teams running very complex marketing-automation form flows with 50-plus field libraries, extensive A/B testing frameworks on form variants, or deep integration with legacy email-automation builders, Marketo and Pardot still carry more specialty depth. The common buyer who evaluates both finds Strkr covers 85 percent of the use case at a fraction of the cost; the 15 percent that needs the specialty tool typically keeps the specialty tool alongside Strkr via webhook.

How does Strkr handle attribution for leads that visit over weeks?

Every touch (visit, content download, form submission, chat conversation, call booking) is captured with timestamp and attribution weight. The attribution model is configurable per team: first-touch, last-touch, linear, time-decay, position-based, or custom-weighted. The admin picks one or several models and runs them in parallel; the exec readout shows all configured models side by side. For teams working through the model choice, we publish an attribution-primer document that walks through the trade-offs. The data layer captures everything; the model is a configuration decision rather than a lock-in.

Can Strkr integrate with session-replay tools like FullStory or Hotjar?

Yes. The native integrations with FullStory and Hotjar surface a session-replay link on each contact record keyed to the session. The AE clicks the link and watches the session in the external tool. For teams that want in-Strkr session visibility without the external tool, Strkr captures page scroll depth, click events, and form interaction events natively; the native capture is lighter than a full session replay but covers the common review needs (which pages engaged the visitor, where they dropped off). The native capture is included on every paid tier; the external tool integrations run on their own licenses.

What is the setup time for the website tracking script?

The tracking script is a 12 KB JavaScript snippet added to the site via standard CMS integration (Google Tag Manager, a Script tag, or a CMS-native integration for WordPress, Webflow, Framer, and others). Setup is typically 15 to 30 minutes end-to-end: install the snippet, verify tracking in the Strkr admin console, configure the firmographic enrichment confidence threshold, test a sample form submission. For teams running a Content Security Policy, the Strkr script is CSP-compatible with documented domain allowlist requirements. We publish the setup guide and the technical documentation openly; most teams complete setup inside a single admin session without a Strkr support call.

Also built for

Related audiences.

CRM with website CRM with marketing CRM with email marketing CRM with automation AI CRM software

Try it free. Bring your team next week.

No sales call, no migration consultant, no four-month implementation. Enter your card, get 14 days of the full Pro tier, cancel any time before day 14 with zero charge. Spin up a workspace, import your CSV, and have something useful before lunch.

Start free trial See pricing