The CRM migration where the week-one data looks cleaner than the week-nine data on the old tool.
Most CRM migrations ship 70 percent of the data and leave the admin a 30 percent cleanup backlog for the next six months. Strkr runs migrations as a white-glove service with field mapping, dedupe, enrichment refresh, workflow translation, and parallel-run validation before cutover.
The CRM migration is where most CRM switches quietly fail. The sales leadership picks a new vendor; the data move takes 6 months longer than promised; the sales team never fully trusts the new tool because the week-one data looked wrong; the admin spends the first two quarters chasing field-mapping fixes instead of building the new motion. The problem is almost never the destination tool. The problem is that migration vendors treat the data move as a one-shot export-and-import rather than a staged project with field mapping, dedupe, enrichment refresh, workflow translation, parallel-run validation, and cutover rehearsal. Trujay and Import2 cover a portion of the market well, but neither owns the full workflow-and-automation migration piece, which is where the deepest switching costs actually live.
The one-shot export-and-import
The migration vendor dumps 400,000 contacts and leaves.
The common migration pattern is a weekend export from the old CRM and a Monday import to the new one. The admin inherits a database with field-mapping gaps (free-text industry field maps to a picklist that does not match), duplicate records (3 Acme Corp entries because the dedupe never ran), stale contact data (phone numbers from 2019), and no workflow translation. Strkr runs migrations as a 2 to 6 week staged project with dedupe, enrichment, and workflow translation included.
The field-mapping drift
The free-text industry field has 1,200 unique values.
Legacy CRMs accumulate free-text where the admin should have shipped a picklist. Industry, lead-source, deal-type, and lost-reason all end up as free-text fields with hundreds of unique values from years of rep input. The naive migration maps them to free-text in the new system, which carries the mess forward. Strkr migration includes a value-reconciliation step that collapses "manufacturing", "Manufacturing", "mfg", and "manuf." into a single clean value against the new picklist.
The dedupe nobody ran
Three Acme Corp records with overlapping deals.
A 10-year-old CRM database routinely carries 8 to 15 percent duplicate account and contact records from merged business units, failed sync jobs, and reps creating new records instead of searching first. The naive migration carries the duplicates forward. Strkr migration runs account and contact dedupe with configurable match rules (domain match on account, email or phone match on contact, fuzzy name match for people) and admin review of close calls before merge.
The workflow translation gap
The 80 HubSpot workflows do not translate themselves.
A mature CRM carries 40 to 120 live workflows. HubSpot workflow syntax does not map one-to-one to Salesforce Flow, and neither maps directly to Strkr Flows. Trujay and Import2 do not translate workflows at all; the admin rebuilds them by hand. Strkr migration includes a workflow-translation pass where the professional-services team reads each source workflow, identifies the Strkr equivalent, consolidates duplicate workflows (common), and rebuilds in Strkr Flows with the admin pairing.
The enrichment staleness
Half the contacts have 2019 job titles.
The old CRM carries old data. Contact job titles, company employee counts, firmographic data, and tech-stack signals go stale fast. The naive migration carries the stale data forward. Strkr migration includes an enrichment refresh pass on the migrated contacts (ZoomInfo, Clearbit, or Strkr's built-in enrichment) so the sales team starts on the new tool with fresh contact data instead of the 2019 state the old database preserved.
The cutover panic
Monday arrives with the sync broken and the pipeline missing.
The cutover weekend without a rehearsal is where migrations die publicly. The admin runs the final export Saturday, imports Sunday, the Monday standup discovers the pipeline is missing a quarter of the deals, and sales leadership questions the switch. Strkr migrations run a parallel-run week where both systems carry live data, every record syncs, and the admin validates row counts before cutover. The cutover weekend is a controlled DNS flip, not a hope-and-pray.
What the Strkr migration ships
The six phases of a done-right CRM migration.
Strkr migrations run as a 2 to 6 week staged project (longer for libraries over 500,000 contacts or 100-plus live workflows). The six phases below are the frame every migration follows, with the professional-services team paired with the customer's admin for the full duration. Pricing is scoped per migration and included in annual contracts over a threshold.
Phase 1: Discovery
Audit the source system end-to-end.
The migration team runs a 3 to 5 day discovery against the source CRM: object inventory, field inventory, workflow inventory, integration inventory, custom object inventory, user and permission inventory, data volume by object. The output is a migration-scope document the admin signs off on before Phase 2 begins. This phase catches the surprises (custom objects nobody mentioned, a 2-million-row activity log, a critical workflow that fires once a quarter) before they become cutover-week emergencies.
Phase 2: Field mapping
Source-to-Strkr field map with picklist reconciliation.
The team builds a complete field map from the source system to Strkr, including picklist value reconciliation (collapsing "manufacturing", "Manufacturing", "mfg" into one clean value), free-text-to-picklist decisions, custom-field creation in Strkr for fields that have no built-in home, and date-format normalization. The admin reviews and signs off before Phase 3 runs any load.
Phase 3: Dedupe and cleanup
Account and contact dedupe with admin review.
The team runs account dedupe (match on domain plus fuzzy name) and contact dedupe (match on email plus phone plus fuzzy name) against the source data. Close-call merges go to an admin review queue; clear-match merges run automatically. The dedupe output includes a report of how many records collapsed, which drives the admin's confidence check before Phase 4.
Phase 4: Workflow translation
Rebuild workflows in Strkr Flows with the admin pairing.
The team reads each source workflow (HubSpot Workflow, Salesforce Flow, Pipedrive Automation, Zoho Workflow), identifies the Strkr Flows equivalent, consolidates duplicates (a mature library typically shrinks 20 to 40 percent in this phase), and rebuilds in Strkr Flows with the admin pairing. The admin ends the phase with a cleaner, better-documented automation library than they started with.
Phase 5: Parallel run
Both systems live for a validation week.
The team sets up a parallel-run week where the source system remains the system of record and Strkr receives every record change via sync. The admin validates row counts, picklist values, workflow fires, and user access against the source. Issues found during parallel run are fixed before cutover; the rehearsal catches the problems the discovery and the field-mapping phase could not predict.
Phase 6: Cutover
DNS flip plus final sync in a 4-hour window.
Cutover weekend runs as a controlled 4-hour window with the final delta sync, the DNS flip for inbound forms and webhooks, and the source-system read-only lock. The admin validates against the parallel-run checklist. Monday morning the team is live on Strkr with the full data, the full workflow library, and the full integration surface. The migration lead stays on-call for 2 weeks post-cutover for any surfacing issues.
Enrichment refresh
Stale firmographic data gets refreshed before go-live.
As part of the migration, the team runs an enrichment refresh on the migrated contacts and accounts using ZoomInfo, Clearbit, or Strkr's built-in enrichment. Company employee counts, industry tags, tech-stack signals, and recent funding events refresh to current state. The sales team starts on Strkr with the current picture of each account instead of a 2019 snapshot.
Integration migration
Rebuild the 15 inbound integrations without a drop.
The team identifies every integration into the source CRM (form fills from the website, Marketo nurture syncs, calendar bookings, call-recording tools, enrichment pipelines, billing-system handoffs) and rebuilds the inbound target as Strkr. The parallel-run week catches integrations that silently dropped payloads. The cutover weekend flips each integration's target with a documented runbook.
Historical activity preservation
The 5-year activity history comes with the record.
Call logs, email threads, meeting records, task history, and note history migrate with each account and contact where the source API exposes them. The historical activity is a crucial piece of context for the account owner on day one of the new tool; migrations that leave it behind cost the team months of institutional memory. The admin signs off on which activity types migrate during Phase 1.
What migration buyers compare on
The real evaluation checklist in 2026.
Most CRM migration conversations focus on data move. The real evaluation is six layers deeper: discovery depth, workflow translation, dedupe policy, parallel-run coverage, cutover rehearsal, and post-cutover support. The cards below are what admins actually ask about when they have been burned on a prior migration.
Discovery depth
A 3-day audit or a 30-minute scoping call.
Strkr: 3 to 5 day discovery with object, field, workflow, integration, and permission inventory. Trujay and Import2 typically run a lighter scoping call before quoting. The depth of discovery predicts how many cutover-week surprises the migration will face. The admin who signed off on a shallow scope is the admin who gets a 2-month cleanup backlog after the move.
Workflow translation
Rebuild the automation library or leave it to the admin.
Strkr includes workflow translation (HubSpot to Strkr Flows, Salesforce Flow to Strkr Flows, Pipedrive Automation to Strkr Flows, Zoho Workflow to Strkr Flows) with the professional-services team pairing with the admin. Trujay and Import2 move data but do not translate automation. The admin inheriting an untranslated workflow library pays the switching cost in Q2 instead of Q0.
Dedupe policy
Admin review of close calls or batch merge with no review.
Strkr dedupe splits matches into clear-merge and admin-review. Clear-merge runs automatically on domain match or email match. Admin-review surfaces fuzzy-name or edge-case matches with the source records side-by-side. Batch merge without review has a 2 to 5 percent false-positive rate historically, which turns into "we lost that account" complaints a quarter later. The admin review step costs 1 or 2 extra days and prevents the complaint.
Parallel-run coverage
A real parallel-run week or a cutover weekend only.
Strkr runs a parallel-run week where both systems carry live data and the admin validates against the source. Integrations are tested end-to-end during the week. Workflows fire against copied data. Users log in and sanity-check their dashboards. The lightweight-migration vendors often skip the parallel-run and go straight to cutover weekend, which maximizes the surprise count.
Cutover window
A 4-hour controlled window or a 48-hour scramble.
Strkr runs cutover as a documented 4-hour window with a signed-off runbook: final delta sync, DNS flip, source read-only lock, validation checklist. The 48-hour scramble pattern is what happens when parallel-run was skipped and cutover is the first time anyone validates row counts. The buyer who has lived through a 48-hour scramble pays for the 4-hour window on the next migration.
Post-cutover support
Two weeks of on-call or hand-off at go-live.
Strkr migration includes 2 weeks of post-cutover on-call where the migration lead stays with the account for surfacing issues (a workflow nobody tested that fires on a quarterly cadence, a report nobody looked at, a permission edge case that affects 2 users). The hand-off-at-go-live model leaves the admin to debug alone, which is where most of the "we hate the new CRM" sentiment originates.
What a Strkr migration will not do
The limits worth knowing.
A migration vendor that cannot name the limits is selling the easy demo. Here is what the Strkr migration service does not do, and the reasoning for each limit.
No week-long migrations
Fast migrations ship broken.
Strkr will not run a migration in under 2 weeks regardless of data volume. The 1-week migration is where the dedupe skips, the workflow translation gets skipped, and the parallel-run gets skipped. Migrations under 50,000 contacts run in 2 to 3 weeks. Migrations above 500,000 contacts or 100-plus workflows run in 4 to 6 weeks. The 2-week floor is the minimum for a migration that does not create a 2-month cleanup backlog.
No arbitrary legacy systems
Source systems need an API or a documented export.
Strkr migrates from any source that exposes a documented API or a bulk export (HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive, Zoho, Freshsales, Monday Sales CRM, Copper, Insightly, ActiveCampaign, Keap, Microsoft Dynamics 365, SugarCRM). Truly bespoke internal systems with no API require a one-time professional-services engagement to build the extraction pipeline, which is scoped separately.
No ongoing dual-write
The migration lands; the old system goes read-only.
Strkr migrations end with the source system in read-only mode and Strkr as the live system. The migration service is not an ongoing dual-write pattern; the parallel-run week is a validation period, not a steady state. Teams that need to keep the old system live for a legacy reporting workflow should keep the Strkr-side as system of record and run read-only reporting against the archive on their own schedule.
No custom-report migration guarantee
Reports rebuild in Strkr, not translate line for line.
Legacy reports (HubSpot custom reports, Salesforce dashboards, Zoho analytics) rebuild in Strkr's reporting surface rather than translate line for line. The data they draw from migrates intact, but the report layouts rebuild. We document the source reports and rebuild the top 10 or 20 by usage during the migration; the long tail is a post-cutover admin task that typically takes 1 or 2 days.
No file-attachment transfer at scale beyond threshold
Over 500 GB of attachments is a scoped side project.
File attachments on records (contracts, call recordings, images) migrate up to 500 GB included. Over that threshold, the attachment transfer runs as a scoped side project with its own storage cost model; the transfer pipeline uses parallel-chunk upload and typically completes 2 to 7 days depending on volume. The scoping conversation happens during Phase 1 discovery when the attachment volume comes to light.
No custom-code port
Legacy Apex, Zapier bridges, custom scripts rebuild in Strkr.
Legacy custom code (Salesforce Apex triggers, HubSpot custom code actions, Zapier bridges, Zoho Deluge scripts) does not translate. The function it performs is identified during discovery, mapped to a Strkr Flows node or a custom-code block, and rebuilt during Phase 4. The old scripts stay in the archive as reference. Teams with large custom-code libraries should budget 20 to 40 percent extra migration time for the rebuild.
Head-to-head
Strkr migration service vs generic migration vendors.
Trujay, Import2, and the generic migration vendors own a portion of the data-move market but do not cover workflow translation, enrichment refresh, or post-cutover support. The head-to-head below surfaces the scope differences.
3 to 5 day audit with object, field, workflow, integration, permission inventory
Scoping call with limited object inventory
Workflow translation
Rebuild automation library in Strkr Flows with admin pairing
Not included; admin rebuilds workflows manually
Dedupe policy
Clear-merge automatic plus admin review of close calls
Batch merge or admin runs dedupe after
Enrichment refresh
ZoomInfo, Clearbit, or Strkr enrichment on migrated records
Not included
Parallel-run validation
Full week with both systems live and admin validation
Cutover weekend only
Integration migration
Rebuild inbound integrations with cutover runbook
Admin rebuilds integrations post-cutover
Historical activity
Call logs, emails, meetings, tasks, notes migrate with record
Activity migration varies by source API coverage
Cutover window
4-hour controlled window with signed runbook
48-hour weekend window typical
Post-cutover support
2 weeks on-call with migration lead
Hand-off at cutover; support ticket queue after
Picklist reconciliation
Free-text and inconsistent values collapsed to clean picklist
Values move as-is; admin cleans up after
How teams use Strkr
How real migrations have run on Strkr.
The teams that come to Strkr for a migration share a common shape: they have been on the previous tool long enough for the data to accumulate real debt, and they are nervous about the switch because of a prior migration that went poorly. The playbooks below are migrations we have run with their scope and outcomes stated.
B2B SaaS from HubSpot, 32 reps
240,000 contacts, 86 workflows, 4-week migration.
A 32-rep B2B SaaS team migrated from HubSpot Marketing and Sales Hub Pro to Strkr in 4 weeks. The source carried 240,000 contacts, 48,000 companies, 12,000 open deals, and 86 live workflows. The dedupe collapsed 15 percent of contact records and 11 percent of company records. Workflow translation consolidated 86 HubSpot workflows into 54 Strkr flows after identifying 32 duplicates and near-duplicates. Cutover ran in a 3-hour Saturday window. Post-cutover sentiment was higher than the admin expected, which the admin attributed to the parallel-run week catching 18 issues before go-live.
A 14-AM agency migrated from Pipedrive Advanced to Strkr in 2.5 weeks. The source carried 60,000 contacts, 8,000 organizations, 4,500 open deals, and 22 Pipedrive automations. The dedupe found 8 percent duplicates (lower than typical because Pipedrive had enforced email-match on save). Automation translation moved all 22 to Strkr Flows and consolidated 3 of them. The agency's custom fields (23 of them) mapped cleanly. Cutover was 2 hours Saturday morning. The admin ran the first Monday standup on Strkr with no reported issues.
A 24-advisor wealth firm migrated from Redtail CRM to Strkr's financial-services configuration in 5 weeks. The source carried 18,000 households, 42,000 contacts across the households, 12 custodial-account types synced from Schwab and Fidelity, and 42 workflow equivalents. The migration included FINRA 17a-4 retention configuration, SEC Rule 204-2 audit log setup, and the household-record model migration. Parallel run caught a Schwab-sync field-name mismatch that would have crashed the custodial-account display on Monday. Cutover was 4 hours Saturday evening. The compliance officer signed off on the audit evidence inside 2 weeks.
A 60-rep mid-market team migrated from Salesforce Sales Cloud Enterprise to Strkr in 6 weeks. The source carried 820,000 contacts, 180,000 accounts, 42,000 opportunities, 180 process-builder and flow automations, and 23 custom objects. The migration consolidated 180 automations into 112 Strkr flows and identified 18 that could retire entirely. Apex triggers (14 of them) rebuilt as Strkr flow actions. The dedupe collapsed 12 percent of contact records. Cutover was a 5-hour Sunday morning window. Post-cutover the RevOps lead reported 40 hours a month of admin time freed, which they attributed to the Strkr Flows debug surface.
Legal from a custom internal system, 30 attorneys
45,000 matters, custom API extraction, 5-week migration.
A 30-attorney mid-size firm migrated from a 15-year-old internal practice-management system to Strkr. The source had no documented export; the migration included a 1-week professional-services engagement to build the extraction pipeline against the internal database. The pipeline exported 45,000 matters, 60,000 contacts, 180,000 time entries, and 320,000 document references. The firm chose to migrate time entries and document references as linked archives rather than live records. Cutover ran in a 4-hour Sunday window. The firm reported matter-intake time dropped 40 percent in the first quarter on Strkr.
The migration where the week-one data looks right.
Start with a Phase 1 discovery call. The migration lead audits the source system, scopes the field mapping, workflow translation, dedupe policy, and cutover window. Fixed-price quote inside 5 business days of discovery sign-off.
How long does a Strkr migration typically take end-to-end?
The timeline depends on data volume and workflow complexity. Migrations under 50,000 contacts with fewer than 30 live workflows typically run 2 to 3 weeks. Migrations between 50,000 and 500,000 contacts with 30 to 100 workflows run 3 to 5 weeks. Migrations above 500,000 contacts or above 100 workflows run 4 to 6 weeks. The timeline is driven more by workflow translation than by data volume because the data move itself takes hours once the field mapping is signed off, while the workflow translation requires the professional-services team to pair with the admin across each live workflow. We will not run a migration in under 2 weeks regardless of volume because the parallel-run and the cutover rehearsal cannot be compressed safely.
What is included in the migration cost versus what is scoped separately?
Included in standard migration pricing: discovery audit, field mapping, picklist reconciliation, account and contact dedupe with admin review, workflow translation (up to 150 source workflows), integration rebuild for standard integrations (forms, calendar, email, enrichment, billing), parallel-run week, cutover support, 2 weeks of post-cutover on-call, and enrichment refresh on up to 100,000 contacts. Scoped separately: custom API extraction for sources without a documented export, file-attachment migration over 500 GB, custom-code port for libraries over 20 scripts, migration of custom objects beyond the standard field map, enrichment refresh on volumes over 100,000. Standard migration pricing scales by source-system complexity and total data volume; we quote fixed-price after Phase 1 discovery.
How does the parallel-run week actually work?
Both systems carry live data for the week. The source CRM remains the system of record; sales reps still log activity and update deals in the source. Strkr receives every record change via a one-way sync from the source. The admin validates row counts, picklist values, workflow fires, user access, dashboard rendering, and integration payloads against the source during the week. Issues found go into a parallel-run fix queue the migration team works through daily. Common findings during parallel run include an edge-case workflow nobody mentioned in discovery, an integration that silently drops a payload shape, and a report that fails on a user permission. The parallel-run week catches these before cutover weekend, which is when they would otherwise land in front of the sales team on Monday morning.
What happens to the old CRM after cutover?
The old CRM goes read-only at cutover. The historical data stays accessible for the length of the vendor contract (typically another 1 to 3 months while the renewal lapses or the contract ends). Teams can export a full data archive at any point during the read-only period. For regulated-industry teams with retention requirements, the archive can be exported as structured files (CSV, JSON) and stored in the firm's long-term archive. Strkr itself retains full historical activity on the migrated records, so the old CRM is not the only copy of the history. Teams can run their old-system contract to expiration without any pressure from Strkr; we have had customers run the read-only old system for 6 months after cutover for internal legal-hold reasons.
How do you handle Zapier connections and other integration glue in the old system?
Zapier bridges, Make scenarios, and other no-code integration glue connected to the old CRM get rebuilt as native Strkr Flows during Phase 4. Most Zapier recipes we encounter are routing a form submit to the CRM, pushing a CRM record change to a billing system, or syncing contacts to an email tool. All of those collapse into Strkr Flows nodes with the webhook action and the standard CRM object actions. The DRY benefit shows up here too; a team that had 18 similar Zapier recipes to shuttle data between tools typically consolidates to 4 or 5 Strkr flows because the sub-flow pattern lets the admin build the common logic once. Teams exit the migration with a smaller integration-glue surface than they started with, and the Strkr integration-glue bill is zero on top of the per-seat subscription.
What is the risk if the migration slips or data lands wrong?
Three protections. First, the parallel-run week is the catch-net; by design most data-shape issues surface during parallel run and are fixed before cutover. Second, the cutover weekend runs a signed-off runbook with validation checkpoints at each phase; cutover does not advance to the DNS flip unless the admin signs off on data validation. Third, if a serious issue surfaces post-cutover within the first 2 weeks, Strkr runs a rollback with the source system brought back out of read-only. Rollbacks are rare (we have run one in the last 18 months and the issue was an upstream vendor change that would have affected both systems anyway), but the option exists and the runbook is documented. The migration lead carries the account from Phase 1 through the full 2-week post-cutover window, so there is no hand-off that could lose context mid-crisis.
No sales call, no migration consultant, no four-month implementation. Enter your card, get 14 days of the full Pro tier, cancel any time before day 14 with zero charge. Spin up a workspace, import your CSV, and have something useful before lunch.
We use cookies.
Essential cookies keep the site working. If you accept, we also enable Google Analytics
so we can see which pages help and which don't. Reject to opt out entirely. Details in our
Privacy Policy.
