Built for government agencies managing constituent relationships
A constituent relationship management platform where cases, inquiries, and grants live on the same record.
Government agencies at the federal, state, local, and municipal level manage constituents across cases, inquiries, grants, permits, and licenses. Strkr ships constituent records, case management, FOIA tracking, grant lifecycle, and agency-wide reporting with compliance posture suitable for public-sector procurement under flat per-seat pricing.
A government agency at the city, county, state, or federal level managing constituents (residents, businesses, grantees, licensees, permit applicants) tends to carry four or five vendor-specific tools: a case-management tool from the 2000s, a records-request tracker, a grants-management platform, a licensing database, and a general-purpose CRM bolted on top. The constituent appears in each tool with a different record ID, which means a resident filing a complaint about a pothole, applying for a small-business grant, and renewing a license appears as three different constituents to three different departments. The elected official or agency director asking how the agency is serving this constituent cannot get the answer in under a week.
The same constituent in four systems
Resident, grantee, licensee, applicant all separate.
A single constituent interacting with a municipal government across pothole complaints, small-business grants, dog licenses, and building permits appears as four different records in four different systems. The agency cannot see the full relationship. Strkr runs constituent records with case, inquiry, grant, license, and permit records linked on one graph.
FOIA tracking is a spreadsheet
Records requests live in a shared Excel file.
Freedom of Information Act or state-equivalent records-request tracking typically runs on a shared spreadsheet maintained by the records officer. SLA deadlines slip. Strkr runs FOIA and records-request tracking as first-class records with SLA tracking, required-response date, assigned-reviewer, redaction-review step, and audit log on every status change.
Grant lifecycle is a separate system
Grantmaking, awards, reporting disconnected from constituents.
Agencies running grant programs typically carry a dedicated grants-management system (eGrants, Fluxx, SmartSimple, Submittable). The grants-system constituent record never links to the agency-wide constituent record. Strkr runs the grant lifecycle (application, review, award, disbursement, reporting) linked to the constituent record so the agency sees the full relationship.
Case management is bespoke per department
Every department ran its own build in 2008.
A county government typically carries 6 to 12 separate case-management systems, one per department (public works, health, social services, planning, parks). Each was built as a bespoke project in a different year with a different vendor. Strkr runs case management as a configurable surface where each department's case types, workflow stages, and custom fields configure through the admin console.
Reporting is a quarterly PDF
The agency director gets numbers quarterly, not live.
Agency-wide reporting typically runs on a quarterly PDF compiled from four or five source systems reconciled by hand. The agency director reads the Q2 performance report in September. Strkr ships live dashboards that refresh as case and constituent events occur, so agency leadership runs on current numbers.
Procurement blockers on cloud SaaS
The agency cannot buy a non-FedRAMP cloud tool.
Federal and some state agencies require FedRAMP authorization for cloud SaaS. Many state and local agencies require StateRAMP or specific compliance documentation. Strkr maintains SOC 2 Type II controls under an ongoing third-party audit, with Type II completion targeted through Q4 of 2026, and the sales team provides a published compliance package for state and local agency procurement review.
What the government CRM runs
Features for the agency serving constituents.
Three agency shapes come up on buyer calls repeatedly: the municipal government at 50 to 500 employees managing residents and small businesses, the state agency at 500 to 5,000 employees managing programs and compliance, and the specialty authority or district (housing authority, water district, transit agency) running focused constituent relationships. The cards below outline the surfaces each shape asks for.
Unified constituent record
Resident, business, grantee, licensee on one graph.
Strkr models the constituent as a central record with linked relationships to cases, inquiries, grants, licenses, permits, and interactions. A resident filing a pothole complaint, applying for a small-business grant, and renewing a dog license shows up as one constituent with three case records linked. The agency director sees the full relationship.
Configurable case management
Case types, workflow stages, custom fields per department.
Each department configures its own case types (pothole complaint, zoning variance, social-services intake, parks reservation), workflow stages (new, assigned, in-progress, awaiting-information, resolved, closed), and custom fields on the admin console. The schema is per-department within one agency tenant. The 2008-era bespoke-build pattern retires.
FOIA and records-request tracking
SLA-tracked requests with audit log.
Public records requests (FOIA at the federal level, state-equivalent at state and local) run as first-class records with SLA tracking, required-response date, assigned-reviewer, redaction-review step, and full audit log. The records officer runs the records-request desk from one surface instead of a shared spreadsheet.
Grant programs run as first-class lifecycle records: application intake with configurable form, review stage with assigned reviewers and scoring rubric, award decision with disbursement schedule, grantee reporting with required documents. The grant record links to the constituent so the agency sees the full relationship.
Agency-wide dashboards
Live numbers by department, program, geography.
Strkr ships live dashboards that refresh as case and constituent events occur: cases open by department, SLA compliance by case type, grant disbursement by program, FOIA throughput by month, service-request heat map by geography. Agency leadership runs the quarterly review on live numbers.
Public-facing portal
Constituent self-service with record visibility.
Strkr can expose a public-facing portal where constituents log in to see their own cases, submit new requests, upload grant documents, and track status. The portal is optional and configurable per agency. Agencies without portal infrastructure can stand one up through Strkr; agencies with existing portals integrate through the open API.
Strkr AI on case triage
Incoming case summaries and routing suggestions.
A new case lands and Strkr AI drafts a summary, extracts the issue type, and suggests the department and reviewer most likely to handle it based on historical patterns. The intake staff review and route in seconds instead of minutes. Every AI output cites the records referenced.
Strkr Messaging for constituent updates
Native SMS at carrier rates for case status.
Strkr Messaging runs SMS and MMS through tier-one US carriers at a twenty-nine-dollar base plus per-send surcharge. The case-status update (for example, a pothole-repair scheduled text on 2026-10-20), the grant-deadline reminder, and the license-renewal notice run through the audit trail. Constituents on cellphones get status without needing to log into a portal.
Open API with free tier
REST plus webhooks for inter-system integration.
Strkr exposes a documented REST plus webhook API with free tier. Agencies integrate with existing systems (ERP, payroll, GIS, legacy case-management) through the API. The webhook feed emits events on constituent, case, grant, and FOIA activity so inter-system handoff runs cleanly.
How Strkr compares with Granicus plus Salesforce Government Cloud plus eGrants
Side by side on the government-CRM questions.
The common incumbent stack for a mid-size agency is Salesforce Government Cloud plus Granicus plus a grants-management tool (eGrants, Fluxx) plus a legacy case-management system per department. Strong on specific surfaces (deep public-sector track record on Salesforce, strong community-engagement features on Granicus). Weaker on the unified constituent record and the flat subscription math. The grid below shows the direct head-to-head.
Unified constituent record
One graph versus four systems.
Strkr runs the constituent as a central record with cases, grants, licenses, and permits linked. The stitched stack carries the constituent in each system with no unified link. The agency director asking how the agency is serving this constituent gets the answer in two clicks on Strkr.
Flat per-seat pricing
No per-constituent meter.
Strkr sits on a flat per-seat subscription with modules included. Salesforce Government Cloud prices by Enterprise or Unlimited edition plus per-user plus often adds grant-management uplifts. For a 250-employee agency, the all-in annual math shifts in Strkr's favor by 30 to 50 percent once module uplifts, grant-management tools, and specialty case-management builds are included.
Configurable case management
Per-department schema on one tenant.
Strkr runs configurable case management with per-department schema on one tenant. The stitched stack typically runs one case-management system per department, each with its own data silo. The cross-department analysis the agency director wants becomes possible on Strkr.
FOIA tracking native
SLA-tracked requests with audit log.
Strkr runs FOIA and records-request tracking as native first-class records. The stitched stack typically runs FOIA tracking in a specialty tool (GovQA, NextRequest) or in a spreadsheet. Strkr delivers the surface natively under the subscription.
AI drafting included
Case triage and summarization on every tier.
Strkr AI drafts case summaries, extracts issue type, and suggests routing on every paid tier with no per-conversation credit meter. The stitched stack typically does not include AI drafting on case triage. Intake staff productivity shifts noticeably once AI is in the workflow.
SOC 2 Type II with ongoing audit
Compliance posture for public-sector procurement.
Strkr maintains SOC 2 Type II controls under an ongoing third-party audit, with Type II completion targeted through Q4 of 2026, and executes a HIPAA business associate agreement where PHI applies. The sales team provides a published compliance package for state and local agency procurement review. For federal agencies specifically requiring FedRAMP authorization, procurement should verify current FedRAMP status before contracting.
Where Strkr fits in a modern government stack
What the platform replaces and what it integrates with.
The government tech stack is wide: GIS, ERP, HR, payroll, finance, public-safety systems, document management, meeting management, public engagement, and the CRM. Strkr sits across the constituent, case, FOIA, and grant surfaces. The honest list below covers what Strkr replaces outright and what stays.
Not an ERP
Tyler Munis, Oracle PeopleSoft, SAP stay.
Strkr does not replace the government ERP (financial, HR, payroll). Tyler Munis, Oracle PeopleSoft, SAP, Workday, and the specialty public-sector ERPs stay. Strkr pulls financial signal via the open API where the ERP exposes one.
Not a GIS
Esri ArcGIS, QGIS stay.
Strkr does not replace Esri ArcGIS or the agency GIS surface. GIS stays for deep spatial analysis. Strkr pulls boundary data (council districts, zoning, service areas) via the open API and renders constituent and case locations on the Strkr map view.
Not a public-safety RMS
Tyler, Niche, CentralSquare stay.
Strkr does not replace public-safety records management (police RMS, fire incident reporting). Those systems stay. Strkr can integrate with public-safety RMS via the open API where appropriate for inter-department coordination (code-enforcement to police, fire-inspection to building permits).
Not a document-management system
Laserfiche, OnBase stay.
Strkr does not replace Laserfiche, Hyland OnBase, or the agency document-management system. Those systems stay for retention policy, records disposition, and compliance archiving. Strkr attaches document links to records and pulls document metadata via the open API.
Not a meeting-management tool
Granicus, Legistar, BoardDocs stay.
Strkr does not replace Granicus, Legistar, or BoardDocs for public-meeting management. Those systems stay. Strkr integrates with meeting-management for public-comment intake and agenda-item tracking where the integration applies.
SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA with BAA
Compliance posture for public-sector workloads.
Strkr maintains SOC 2 Type II controls under an ongoing third-party audit, with Type II completion targeted through Q4 of 2026, and executes a HIPAA business associate agreement for human-services agencies handling PHI. The admin console carries the compliance record. Federal procurement requiring FedRAMP should verify current status with sales.
Head-to-head
Strkr vs Salesforce Government Cloud plus stitched systems.
The direct side-by-side on dimensions a mid-size government agency weighs when evaluating a constituent-relationship platform. Salesforce strengths on deep public-sector track record are acknowledged; the comparison focuses on unified-record and subscription-economics dimensions.
Feature
Strkr
Salesforce Government Cloud + Granicus + eGrants / Fluxx
Pricing basis
Flat per seat, modules included
Per-edition CRM plus per-user plus grants plus engagement
Unified constituent record
One graph across cases, grants, FOIA
Separate records per system
Configurable case management
Per-department schema on one tenant
Typically one system per department
FOIA tracking native
SLA-tracked with audit log
Specialty tool or spreadsheet
Grant lifecycle on record
Linked to constituent
Separate grants-management tool
AI case triage
Native with record citations
Rarely included
Native SMS
Strkr Messaging over tier-one carriers
Varies
Open API
REST plus webhooks, documented, free tier
Varies
SOC 2 Type II
Controls in place, Type II completion through 2026-Q4
Varies by product
FedRAMP
Verify current status with sales for federal procurement
Salesforce Gov Cloud: yes
How teams use Strkr
How government agencies run Strkr day to day.
The common thread on agencies that choose Strkr for the constituent-management story: they want the unified constituent record and the flat subscription math. Each playbook below runs today on a government account.
Mid-size city, 320 employees
Unified constituent record surfaces the same resident in four departments.
A mid-size city with 320 employees across 11 departments had been running four separate systems: a Salesforce Government Cloud deployment, a Granicus engagement tool, a GovQA FOIA tracker, and a legacy case-management system per department. After moving to Strkr with unified constituent records, the city discovered that one resident had filed 23 complaints across public works, parks, and planning over three years. The departments coordinated a direct conversation and the complaint volume from that resident dropped by 80 percent.
State grants agency, 180 employees
Grant lifecycle on the constituent record cuts review time by 40 percent.
A state grants agency with 180 employees had been running Submittable for grant intake, a separate review workflow in email, a separate award tracker in Excel, and no constituent-record link. After moving to Strkr with the full grant lifecycle on the constituent record, average review time dropped from 48 days to 29 days. The agency processed 22 percent more grant applications in the next fiscal year without hiring.
County government, 1,100 employees
FOIA SLA compliance climbs from 72 percent to 96 percent.
A county government with 1,100 employees had been running FOIA tracking on a shared spreadsheet maintained by a part-time records officer. SLA compliance ran at 72 percent (28 percent of requests exceeded the statutory deadline). After moving to Strkr with FOIA records, SLA tracking, and auto-assignment to the right department reviewer, SLA compliance climbed to 96 percent in the first full fiscal quarter. The records officer's workload shifted from spreadsheet maintenance to redaction review.
Specialty authority, 60 employees
Native SMS cuts missed appointment rate by 55 percent.
A specialty authority (housing authority with 60 employees managing 4,200 resident households) had a chronic missed-appointment problem on inspections and recertifications. After rolling out Strkr Messaging with native SMS reminders at 72 hours, 24 hours, and 2 hours before each appointment, missed appointments dropped from 31 percent to 14 percent. The authority served 42 percent more households per month without adding inspector capacity.
Give the agency one record for the constituent, the case, the grant, and the inquiry.
Spin up a 14-day trial with unified constituent records, configurable case management, FOIA tracking, grant lifecycle, and agency-wide dashboards ready in a sandbox tenant. Compare a flat per-seat line against the current stitched government stack.
Procurement teams evaluating Strkr for federal workloads should verify current FedRAMP status with the Strkr sales team directly, since authorization timelines evolve. Strkr maintains SOC 2 Type II controls under an ongoing third-party audit (Type II completion targeted through 2026-Q4) and executes a HIPAA business associate agreement for workloads involving PHI. State and local agencies typically require StateRAMP or a published compliance package; Strkr provides the compliance documentation suitable for state and local procurement review.
How does Strkr handle multi-department workflows on one tenant?
Strkr runs per-department schema on one tenant through the admin console. Each department configures its own case types, workflow stages, custom fields, user permissions, and dashboards without needing a separate tenant. Cross-department records (a resident who touches both public works and planning) stay unified under one constituent record. Role-based access controls govern who can see which case types. The 2008-era pattern of one bespoke system per department retires in favor of configuration on a shared platform.
What about FOIA and public-records request compliance?
Strkr runs FOIA and state-equivalent records-request tracking as native records. Each request carries SLA tracking (statutory response deadline per jurisdiction), assigned-reviewer with escalation, redaction-review step with audit log, and the published-response packaging. The records officer runs the records-request desk from one surface with per-request audit history. Agencies in jurisdictions with specific response-time statutes (10 business days, 20 calendar days, varies by state) configure the SLA accordingly.
Can we integrate with the agency ERP and GIS?
Yes. The Strkr open API supports integration with Tyler Munis, Oracle PeopleSoft, SAP, Workday, and the specialty public-sector ERPs via REST or SFTP flat-file exchange where the ERP exposes limited API. For GIS, Strkr pulls boundary data (council districts, zoning, service areas, parcels) from Esri ArcGIS via the API and renders constituent and case locations on the Strkr map view. The Strkr delivery team supports the standard integration patterns on the standard subscription.
What does migration from Salesforce Government Cloud plus stitched systems look like?
The typical migration runs 10 to 20 weeks for a 300-employee agency with 4 to 6 source systems. Weeks one and two cover source-system inventory and data mapping. Weeks three through six handle historical data import through the Strkr import API with field mapping. Weeks seven through ten cover department-by-department workflow configuration. Weeks eleven through fourteen run parallel pilots on one or two departments. Weeks fifteen through twenty handle agency-wide cutover with legacy systems kept read-only for 90 days. The Strkr delivery team manages the migration on the standard subscription at no additional project cost.
What is the pricing posture for a 200-employee municipal government?
Flat per-seat on every paid tier with modules included. A 200-employee municipal government pays per active seat per month on monthly or annual cadence, and the constituent records, case management, FOIA tracking, grant lifecycle, dashboards, messaging, AI, and open API are all included. There is no per-constituent meter and no credit meter below the plan cap on AI usage. Agencies switching from Salesforce Government Cloud plus Granicus plus eGrants typically see 30 to 50 percent lower all-in annual cost once module uplifts and per-user tier increases are included.
No sales call, no migration consultant, no four-month implementation. Enter your card, get 14 days of the full Pro tier, cancel any time before day 14 with zero charge. Spin up a workspace, import your CSV, and have something useful before lunch.
We use cookies.
Essential cookies keep the site working. If you accept, we also enable Google Analytics
so we can see which pages help and which don't. Reject to opt out entirely. Details in our
Privacy Policy.
