Built for law firms

The CRM for law firms that still lose intakes to the inbox.

A law firm wins or loses most of its revenue in the first 72 hours after a prospective client reaches out. Intake conversion, conflict checking, referral attribution, and matter opening are CRM problems, not case management problems. Strkr runs the lead-to-engagement motion in front of the practice management stack your firm already pays for.

Start free trial See pricing
What this audience is actually dealing with

The pains that bring buyers here.

Three dynamics make CRM evaluation different for law firms than for most buyer categories. The intake-to-engagement motion is the biggest leak point in firm revenue, and most firms do not track it with the discipline the numbers would justify. Conflict checking is a hard legal and ethical requirement that most general CRMs leave to a manual checklist nobody is accountable for. The practice management vendors have strong matter management features but weak intake and marketing tools, which forces firms into a two-system reality that most legal operations teams have not fully reconciled on paper. The result is a stack where the practice management tool runs the back half of the business flawlessly and the front half runs on inbox discipline, shared spreadsheets, and the memory of whichever paralegal happens to be at the desk when the phone rings.

The 72-hour window

Intake conversion dies in the inbox.

A prospective client who fills out a contact form or leaves a voicemail converts at a dramatically higher rate when a lawyer or paralegal responds inside the first hour, and the drop-off curve past that first hour is steep. Firms that run intake through a shared email inbox and a Monday-morning triage meeting lose the inbound inquiries that would have been their best cases, because the prospect called the second firm on the search results page while waiting. The response-time curve is not opinion. It is the single most studied conversion variable in professional services, and the ten-year marketing literature is unambiguous on the direction of the effect.

Conflict checks live in a spreadsheet

The conflict step blocks the intake, invisibly.

Every firm has a conflict policy. Most firms run that policy as a manual search of the practice management database, executed by a staff member who may or may not be at the desk when the inquiry comes in. The prospective client sits waiting in email purgatory. The intake coordinator cannot schedule the consult until the conflict check comes back clean, and the clock on the prospect decision is still ticking the whole time. A multi-day lag at this step is normal across the industry. A CRM that models the conflict check as a required intake stage with explicit ownership, a response SLA, and surface-level search tooling cuts that lag by 80 percent in the firms that measure it before and after.

Referrals are the business

Nobody tracks where the cases actually come from.

Depending on practice area, 40 to 80 percent of new business at most firms is referred. Referred by other attorneys who do not practice in the same area, by former clients who had a good outcome, by medical providers who see injured patients every day, by community contacts the partners cultivated for years. Firms universally say referrals are their most important source of new matters. Firms universally do not have clean referral attribution tied to signed matter value. The partner who sends the thank-you note picks a name from memory, not from the CRM, because the CRM does not have a clean referral source model and the practice management system records the source as a free-text field that nobody normalizes.

Marketing budget vs case value

The firm cannot answer which ad channel actually works.

A plaintiff firm spending 40,000 dollars a month on digital advertising and television is almost never able to tell you which specific channel produced the signed cases that paid for the quarter. The attribution chain breaks at intake because the intake form does not capture source, or the source lives in a spreadsheet, or the matter opens in the practice management system where the source field is blank or has never been filled consistently. The marketing budget decision gets made on vibes and on whichever vendor was most recently in the office. Firms that solve this one problem routinely find that one of their highest-spend channels is producing the lowest cost per signed case and that another high-spend channel is producing almost nothing.

Practice management is for after engagement

The matter management stack starts too late.

The practice management category is strong at trust accounting, time tracking, document management, calendaring, and billing. It is comparatively weak at the pre-engagement motion that produces the matters in the first place: lead capture, nurture, email sequences, SMS follow-up, pipeline reporting, consult scheduling, win-loss analysis. The firm needs both halves of the workflow, and most firms try to force one tool to do the job of two or to run the pre-engagement half on a shared inbox and a kanban board. The structural answer is a CRM in front of the practice management stack, with a clean handoff at the engagement signature.

Client communication is scattered

Who called the client last, and what did they say?

A paralegal takes a call. A partner texts the client from a personal cell phone. An associate emails a document from the firm Outlook account. The intake coordinator leaves a voicemail. Six touches on the same matter across four systems in a single week. When the managing partner asks for the status, no one person can answer without opening four tabs and asking three people. A CRM that logs every email, call, text, and meeting on the matter record is table stakes, and it is the first question legal operations teams ask about when they evaluate the category.

How Strkr fits a law firm motion

The primitives law firm intake teams actually need.

Strkr is positioned as the lead-to-engagement CRM for law firms. Not a case management system. Not a trust accounting system. The job of this layer is to turn inbound inquiries into signed engagement letters as fast and as attributably as possible, then hand off cleanly to the practice management stack where the real matter work happens.

Matter custom objects

The matter record, not the deal record.

A matter in Strkr is a first-class custom object with practice-area-specific fields: injury type for PI, dispute type for litigation, deal type for transactional, charge for criminal defense, filing type for family law. Firms model their intake taxonomy once, and every piece of reporting and automation reads from the same shared vocabulary. No bending a sales-pipeline schema to pretend it fits legal work.

Intake automation

The inbound inquiry becomes a tracked intake in seconds.

A web form submission, a chat conversation, an inbound call via the firm phone system, or a referral form from a referring attorney all create an intake record automatically. The record is routed to the correct intake coordinator based on practice area, geography, and load balancing. The response SLA clock starts. If the first response does not go out inside the firm policy window, the intake escalates to a supervising attorney.

Conflict check workflow

The required step that nobody can skip.

Every intake record has a conflict check stage that must be marked clear before the intake can advance to the consult stage. The assigned staff member runs the search against the firm database, logs the result on the record, and the stage advances automatically. Firms with a formal conflict step cut their average time-from-inquiry-to-consult-scheduled from days to hours, and more importantly, they have an audit trail that satisfies the ethics requirement.

Referral source tracking

Attribution to the person, not the category.

Every intake records a referral source as a lookup to a contact record. The lookup lets you select the referring attorney, the former client, the medical provider, or the community contact by name. A quarterly referral report rolls up signed matters by referral source. The thank-you note goes to the right person. The reciprocal referral tracking lets partners see which outside counsel they refer to vs who refers back.

Email and call logging

Every touch on the matter record automatically.

Native email sync captures every message to or from the prospective client on the matter record. Native call logging via the firm phone system records call time, duration, and (where recordings are allowed) the recording file. Text messages via the SMS module land on the record. The managing partner asking "what is the status" is a one-click answer.

Document templates

Fee agreement drafting in three clicks.

The fee agreement, HIPAA authorization, limited scope engagement, and representation letter are all document templates that merge fields from the matter record. The template library is organized by practice area, with permissions so the family law templates do not show up on a PI intake. A new intake coordinator can produce a correct fee agreement on day one without opening a Word template folder with 40 similarly named files and picking the wrong one.

Strkr AI

Intake summary and next-step draft in seconds.

When an intake coordinator finishes a call, Strkr AI drafts a case summary from the call recording and the form submission, pulls out the key facts (statute of limitations date, insurance carrier, mechanism of injury, prior counsel), and suggests the next step. The partner reviewing the intake queue reads a one-paragraph summary of each case instead of 20 free-text notes of varying quality.

Pipeline reporting

Signed matter rate by referral source and practice area.

The intake pipeline reports in Strkr show inquiries, consults scheduled, consults held, offers made, engagements signed, lost reasons, and signed matter value by practice area and by referral source. The managing partner gets the one view that explains where the firm revenue comes from and where it leaks. Firms that have this view make different marketing and staffing decisions than firms that do not.

Clean handoff to practice management

The engagement signature triggers the handoff.

When the engagement letter is signed, a flow pushes the matter record into the practice management system via native integration or webhook. Trust accounting, time tracking, document management, and billing happen in the practice management tool where they belong. Strkr keeps the client-communication log and the referral attribution. Nothing is duplicated, and nothing falls between the two systems.

The pre-engagement half of a law firm

What a CRM should do before the engagement letter.

The best law firm operations teams in 2026 do not treat the CRM as a nice-to-have on top of the practice management system. They treat it as the operating system for everything that happens before the engagement letter is signed. That is where the firm wins or loses most of its revenue, and that is where the data model treats the matter record as the center.

Intake routing

Right coordinator, first touch, every time.

An inbound inquiry for a PI case routes to the PI intake coordinator, not the family law coordinator. An inquiry from a Spanish-speaking caller routes to the bilingual intake. An inquiry from an existing client routes to the attorney already on the matter. The routing rules are built in a visual flow canvas and adjusted by the operations manager without a certified admin.

Consult scheduling

The consult books itself from the website.

The prospective client picks a consult slot from a public calendar that respects the firm hours, holidays, and the correct attorney for the practice area. The booking creates the matter record, sends the confirmation email, triggers the SMS reminder sequence, and places the event on the attorney calendar. The intake coordinator does not play phone tag over scheduling.

Nurture sequences

The slow-decision lead stays warm, automatically.

A prospective client who is not ready to engage today enters a nurture sequence based on practice area and intake stage. Transactional and family law prospects often take 60 to 180 days to decide. The firm that stays in the inbox with helpful content, not pressure, wins a disproportionate share of these cases. The sequence is marketing automation, which Strkr ships as a module on every paid tier.

Statute tracking

The clock on every PI matter is visible.

Every PI intake record has a statute of limitations date. A dashboard shows every open matter sorted by statute remaining, with color coding under 60 days, under 30 days, under 14 days. Firms that run this view do not file suit on the courthouse steps because they lost track of the clock. The practice management system has this field too, but during intake, before the matter opens over there, this is where it needs to live.

Loss reasons

Why the firm did not sign the case.

An intake that does not convert gets a loss reason. Not the right practice area. Not enough case value. Conflict. Client went with a competitor. Client did not sign. Each loss reason feeds a quarterly report the managing partner reviews. The top three loss reasons account for most of the leakage. Firms without this data cannot course-correct their intake process.

Reactivation cadence

Last year losses come back as this year signed matters.

A prospective client who did not engage this year is re-engaged in six months, in twelve months, and in two years with low-pressure check-ins. A meaningful share of lost intakes convert within 24 months when the firm stays in touch. Most firms write these off at the moment of first loss. A reactivation cadence recovers revenue that was already in the funnel.

What law firm buyers compare on

The checklist that actually matters.

Most "best CRM for law firms" articles compare feature matrices between tools that are mostly practice management systems with a thin CRM layer bolted on top. The real evaluation is different. A firm that already has a practice management tool is picking a CRM for the pre-engagement half. The criteria that matter sit somewhere else.

Time to first useful day

Days from signup to a coordinator working intakes.

Strkr: typically 2 to 7 days with a RevOps generalist or an operations manager configuring intake forms, routing, and the first set of templates. Legal-specific tools often require a 2 to 6 week implementation partner engagement because the data model is deeply tied to practice management setup. The time cost shows up as missed inbound inquiries during the implementation window.

Practice management integration

How clean is the handoff after the engagement letter?

The honest answer across the category is that most legal CRMs that are not themselves part of a practice management suite rely on a webhook or Zapier-style sync. Strkr ships native webhook ingestion and native API calls for the common practice management stacks. The handoff is a scheduled flow, not a middleware subscription.

Marketing automation included

Nurture sequences without a second vendor.

Firms that treat marketing automation as a separate purchase end up with the CRM and a standalone email tool that do not share a contact record cleanly. Strkr includes marketing automation on every paid tier. The nurture sequence runs off the same contact record the intake coordinator is working. One record, one source of truth.

Native SMS

Reminder and consult-prep text messages as a module.

A consult confirmation and consult reminder sent as SMS shows up to 95 percent open rate inside the first 90 minutes. Email confirmations run 20 to 40 percent in the same window. Native SMS as a module in Strkr means the firm has a texting workflow without a separate messaging contract. The compliance side (consent capture, DND handling) is built in.

Mobile UX

What the partner sees between hearings.

A partner between a deposition and a client meeting has 90 seconds to review the intake queue, approve a fee agreement, and respond to a referring attorney. Strkr mobile is a first-class surface with offline queue, matter edit, voice-note capture, and a redline-capable fee agreement review. The mobile experience is the one most legal CRMs underinvest in.

Reporting flexibility

Signed matter rate by source, cost per signed case.

The marketing partner wants cost per signed case by channel. The managing partner wants signed matter value by referral source. The intake supervisor wants response-time distribution by coordinator. Strkr ships cross-object reports on every paid tier, with a custom report builder for the operations team that wants to go further. Legal-specific tools often have a fixed report set that is strong on practice management KPIs and thin on intake KPIs.

Head-to-head

Strkr vs legal-specific tools for the intake-to-engagement motion.

The common pattern at a growing firm is a practice management tool for post-engagement work plus a CRM for the pre-engagement motion. Strkr is the second piece. Here is the honest side-by-side against the pre-engagement features of the legal-specific category.

Feature Strkr Typical legal-specific tool
Primary design center Lead-to-engagement motion, built as the layer in front of practice management Matter management, trust accounting, time, and billing; intake is a secondary surface
Custom objects Matter custom objects with practice-area-specific fields on every paid tier Fixed matter schema tied to the practice management data model
Intake routing Visual flow canvas with practice-area, language, and load-balanced routing Round-robin or static assignment, less practice-area aware
Conflict check workflow First-class intake stage with ownership, SLA, and audit log Manual search against the practice management database
Referral source model Lookup to contact record with roll-up reporting by signed matter value Free-text field or category picklist, limited roll-up
Marketing automation Native module on every paid tier, shared contact record Separate purchase or third-party integration
Native SMS and MMS Native module with compliance, consent, and DND built in Third-party integration, often extra per-message pricing
Document templates Merge-field templates organized by practice area Often tied to the billing and time module, not the intake surface
Pipeline reporting Signed matter rate by source and practice area with custom report builder Billing-oriented reports strong, intake-oriented reports thinner
Mobile offline queue First-class mobile with offline queue and voice-note capture Mobile wrapper over the web app, limited offline support
How teams use Strkr

Playbooks law firms run on Strkr today.

The common thread across law firm customers: automate the moments where the firm loses revenue to lag. The first-response moment, the conflict-check moment, the consult-reminder moment, the referral thank-you moment, the loss-reason capture. Every one of these is where firm revenue leaks on a generic CRM or on the pre-engagement side of a practice management tool.

PI firm

Sixty-minute first-response SLA with escalation.

A 12-attorney plaintiff PI firm runs a 60-minute first-response SLA on every inbound inquiry. The intake form fires a routed task, a confirmation email, a confirmation text, and a 60-minute timer. If the intake coordinator has not had a live conversation with the prospective client inside 60 minutes, the task escalates to the supervising attorney and the intake stays flagged in the daily operations review. First-touch rate at the one-hour mark went from 42 percent to 94 percent in the first quarter of running this.

Family law practice

Ninety-day nurture for the slow-decision client.

A 6-attorney family law firm runs a 90-day nurture sequence for prospective divorce and custody clients who are not ready to engage on first contact. The sequence sends weekly helpful content (process explainers, what-to-expect timelines, cost ranges, one-click re-engage links) over 12 touches. A single consult coordinator manages the sequence through Strkr marketing automation. Roughly 18 to 22 percent of the nurtured prospects engage within the 90-day window, which is business the firm was previously writing off.

Boutique litigation firm

Conflict check as a required pipeline stage.

A 20-attorney commercial litigation boutique runs the conflict check as an explicit pipeline stage with ownership and a 2-hour SLA. The conflict analyst runs the search against the practice management database and logs the clearance (or the conflict) on the intake record. Average time-from-inquiry-to-consult-scheduled dropped from 2.3 days to 4.8 hours in the first month, which translated directly into higher sign rates on the inbound inquiries that previously went cold during the lag.

Mid-size plaintiff firm

Referral source reporting by signed matter value.

A 40-attorney plaintiff firm runs quarterly referral reporting that rolls up signed matter projected value by referring attorney, by medical provider, and by former client. The managing partner reviews the top 20 sources every quarter. The firm redirected roughly 30 percent of its marketing spend out of two underperforming channels and into a referral partner cultivation program. The year-over-year signed matter value from the top 10 referral partners doubled.

Multi-practice regional firm

Loss-reason reporting that changes the intake script.

A 70-attorney regional firm with transactional, litigation, and family law practices tracks loss reason on every unsigned intake. The quarterly review surfaced that 34 percent of transactional losses were tied to pricing uncertainty on the initial consult. The firm restructured the first-touch script to include a transparent flat-fee range for the common engagement types. Signed matter rate on transactional intake rose 11 points inside two quarters.

The law firm CRM shape, built for intake-to-engagement.

Start a 14-day trial with CRM, Marketing, Projects, Messaging, and Docs enabled from day one. Model your matter object, build your intake flow, and wire in your practice management handoff in an afternoon. See transparent per-seat pricing with the full product on every paid tier.

Start free trial See pricing
Common questions

What buyers in this bucket ask most.

Is Strkr a case management or trust accounting system?

No, and we want to be clear on that from the start. Strkr is a lead-to-engagement CRM. It handles the intake, nurture, consult, fee agreement, and engagement signature side of the business. Once the engagement letter is signed, the matter work (trust accounting, time tracking, document management, calendaring, billing) happens in a practice management tool. Strkr integrates with the common practice management stacks so the handoff is clean. Firms that try to use a case management tool as a CRM, or a CRM as a case management tool, generally end up unhappy with both.

How does Strkr fit alongside Clio, PracticePanther, MyCase, Lawmatics, or Rocket Matter?

Those products are strong at post-engagement matter management, with varying intake surfaces attached. A firm that already runs on one of them and wants a stronger intake and marketing motion typically picks Strkr for the pre-engagement side and keeps the practice management tool for everything after the engagement letter. Strkr handles the inbound inquiry, intake routing, conflict workflow, nurture sequences, consult scheduling, document templating for the engagement letter, and the referral attribution. The practice management tool handles the actual matter work. Strkr pushes the matter into the practice management tool at engagement signature via native integration or webhook so nothing is duplicated.

Does Strkr do conflict checking?

Strkr models conflict checking as a required pipeline stage with ownership, SLA, and audit log. The actual conflict search is run by a staff member against the firm database, which is typically the practice management tool. Strkr surfaces the step, enforces the ownership, logs the result on the intake record, and advances the pipeline once the check is clear. That is the piece most firms are missing. The underlying client-and-matter search still happens where the data lives. For firms with a dedicated conflicts database, Strkr integrates with it via webhook or API.

What practice areas is Strkr a good fit for?

Any practice area where the firm has a measurable intake-to-engagement motion with inbound inquiries. The common fits are plaintiff personal injury, mass tort, consumer and business litigation, family law, criminal defense, immigration, estate planning, and transactional work (real estate, M&A, employment on the defense or plaintiff side). Boutiques and mid-size firms from 2 to 100 attorneys are the sweet spot. Solo practitioners often get more value out of the practice management tool alone until they start hiring an intake coordinator. Very large firms over 100 attorneys typically have in-house CRM teams and a bespoke stack; Strkr is a reasonable fit but the sales process looks different.

How does Strkr handle referral source attribution?

Every intake records a referral source as a lookup to a contact record. The lookup lets you select the referring attorney, the medical provider, the former client, or the community contact by name. You can tag multiple sources on an intake. A quarterly roll-up report shows signed matter value by referral source, by practice area, over any time window. The thank-you note workflow pulls from the same list so the right person gets the acknowledgment. For firms that run a formal reciprocal referral tracking program, Strkr shows the inbound-vs-outbound balance by referring attorney, which is a conversation starter for partners.

How does ethics and privacy work for client data in Strkr?

Strkr treats intake data as privileged in behavior if not in formal legal status. Role-based permissions let the firm restrict matter access to the attorneys and staff actually working an engagement, with practice-area-scoped roles so a family law paralegal does not see commercial litigation matters. Field-level permissions are available on Pro and up for the most sensitive fields such as fee amounts, settlement figures, and medical details. Full audit logging on every record change is standard, which is what the ethics committee asks for when a question comes up months later. The data is encrypted at rest and in transit. For firms with specific state bar or data-residency requirements, the security team can walk through the hosting and encryption model and provide the documentation an in-house counsel needs. The firm is responsible for its own retention policy, and Strkr provides the tooling to enforce it in a consistent way.

What is the migration path from an existing CRM or spreadsheet?

Strkr has a general CRM migration tool that imports contacts, matters, pipelines, custom fields, and automations from the common CRMs. For firms coming off a spreadsheet or a legal-specific intake tool, we provide a CSV import that maps to the matter custom object schema. The deeper work is the nurture sequence rebuild, which usually takes 1 to 2 weeks for a firm with 5 to 15 active sequences. Most firms are fully live in 2 to 6 weeks depending on the practice area breadth and the complexity of the intake routing rules.

What size firm is Strkr not a good fit for?

A pure solo practitioner with no intake coordinator and a modest inbound volume generally gets more value out of a practice management tool alone until they hire the first staff member and the inbox becomes a bottleneck. A very large firm (over 150 attorneys) with an in-house CRM admin team and a bespoke stack of custom tools often has specific requirements that are outside the shape of a product in the Strkr category, and those firms typically run a heavily customized enterprise CRM instead. Below that upper bound and above the solo-practice floor, Strkr is almost always the right fit for the pre-engagement motion, and the common pattern is a firm between 5 and 60 attorneys that has outgrown the inbox but is not yet at the scale where an in-house admin team is justified.

Also built for

Related audiences.

For Small Business For SDRs

Try it free. Bring your team next week.

No sales call, no migration consultant, no four-month implementation. Enter your card, get 14 days of the full Pro tier, cancel any time before day 14 with zero charge. Spin up a workspace, import your CSV, and have something useful before lunch.

Start free trial See pricing