Built for teams buying lead-scoring capability

The CRM that scores every lead with reasoning text, not a magic number the SDR cannot trust.

Lead scoring that nobody trusts is lead scoring that nobody uses. Strkr AI returns a fit score plus a short reasoning paragraph on every lead, updated when the record changes. The SDR reads the reasoning in 15 seconds and works the top of the queue with confidence.

What this audience is actually dealing with

The pains that bring buyers here.

Lead scoring is one of those features every CRM promises and almost no team actually uses. The reason is simple: the score ends up at 50 for every lead because nobody populates the rules systematically, or the score is a magic number with no reasoning. The pain points below are what Strkr onboarding hears on every intake call with a sales team that has tried lead scoring and bounced.

The magic-number problem

A score without reasoning is a number nobody trusts.

A legacy CRM lead score reads 78 and the SDR has no idea what drove the number. Was it the title? The industry? The website visits? Without reasoning the score ends up ignored in favor of the SDR gut feel. Strkr AI returns a fit score plus a short reasoning paragraph on every call. The reasoning cites the retrieval sources so the SDR can click through to verify.

The rules sprawl

42 scoring rules that drift within a quarter.

A legacy lead scoring system runs on manually configured rules (title contains Director adds 20, revenue over $10M adds 15, three website visits adds 10). The admin builds 42 rules and nobody maintains them. Within a quarter the rules reflect reality from 90 days ago. Strkr AI scores from the record context without manual rule maintenance. The admin tunes thresholds and lets the model handle the nuance.

The intent gap

Fit score without intent misses the ready buyer.

A great fit lead who is not ready to buy wastes SDR time. A medium fit lead who is actively researching is a hot opportunity. Legacy stacks score fit without intent. Strkr runs a separate buyer-intent score (0 to 100) on inbound email replies and form submissions, which the SDR uses alongside the fit score for queue prioritization.

The scoring drift

A score frozen at capture that never updates.

A legacy stack scores the lead at capture and freezes the number. The lead opens three emails, visits the pricing page twice, and replies to the thank-you with a budget question. The fit score does not budge. Strkr AI scores update when the record changes (contact added, note added, document uploaded, email reply received). The SDR sees the current fit, not a stale snapshot.

The scoring cost

A credit meter that burns past the floor by day 18.

Legacy intelligent CRMs ship lead scoring on a credit meter that depletes under heavy use. A 42-rep team hits the floor by day 18 and the invoice spikes. Strkr prices Strkr AI as a flat $49 per month add-on with 5,000 calls included and $0.012 per call overage. The invoice stays flat and predictable.

The compliance gap

Scores without audit trail fail enterprise review.

A compliance team at a regulated enterprise wants an audit trail on every scoring decision (who was scored, when, by what model, with what retrieval context). Legacy scoring systems log the score, not the context. Strkr audit log captures timestamp, user, record context, retrieval scope, and reasoning for every Strkr AI call with 90-day default retention tunable per tenant.

How Strkr AI scores every lead

Fit and intent on every record automatically.

Strkr AI lead scoring runs on every account, contact, deal, and custom record automatically. The buyer never picks a model, never configures a provider, never writes a prompt from scratch. Strkr AI is an opt-in add-on at $49 per month with 5,000 calls included and $0.012 per call overage. The cards below walk through the scoring surfaces.

Fit score

0 to 100 with reasoning text.

Every record carries a Strkr AI fit score (0 to 100) with reasoning text. The score pulls from industry fit, revenue band fit, geographic fit, UTM campaign quality, prior engagement, and firmographic enrichment where available. The SDR sees the score and the reasoning on the record card and sorts by score to work high-fit first.

Reasoning text

Why this score, in plain English.

The reasoning text explains the score in two or three sentences. For example: Industry fit strong (SaaS, 180 to 400 employees), revenue band on target ($20M to $50M), geographic fit (North America), prior engagement moderate (one website visit, one form submission). The SDR reads the reasoning in 15 seconds and either works the lead or deprioritizes.

Intent score

How ready is this lead to engage.

On inbound email replies and subsequent form submissions Strkr AI runs a buyer-intent score (0 to 100). A lead that replies within 10 minutes with specific product questions scores higher than one that replies in 48 hours with generic acknowledgement. The intent score drives inbox priority for the SDR.

Score updates

The number stays current.

Fit and intent scores update when the record changes. A contact added, a note added, a document uploaded, an email reply received, a pipeline stage advanced. The SDR sees the current fit, not a stale snapshot. The scoring runs on a batch cadence for high-volume updates and in real-time for high-signal events (reply, stage change).

Threshold tuning

High-fit, medium-fit, low-fit bands.

The admin configures threshold bands for high-fit (over 70 by default), medium-fit (40 to 70), and low-fit (under 40). High-fit leads route to the senior SDR queue with a 2-hour SLA. Medium-fit leads route to the standard queue with a 24-hour SLA. Low-fit leads route to a nurture flow with a polite auto-reply.

Firmographic enrichment

The missing data points filled in.

Strkr integrates with firmographic enrichment providers through the standard webhook spec to fill in missing data points (revenue band, employee count, industry classification, technology stack). The enriched data feeds the fit score and surfaces on the record card. The admin brings their enrichment vendor; Strkr handles the integration surface.

Scoring audit log

Every call captured for review.

The audit log captures every scoring call with timestamp, user, record context, retrieval scope, reasoning text summary, and the resulting score. The compliance team can run audit reports for enterprise customers. The retention runs 90 days by default, tunable per tenant up to compliance-specified ceilings. The log clears when the underlying record deletes.

The SDR queue ranking

How scoring drives daily work.

Lead scoring is only useful if it drives daily SDR behavior. Strkr ranks the SDR queue by fit score, intent score, SLA timer, and routing rule. The SDR opens Strkr in the morning and sees the top of the queue ranked for action. The cards below walk through the queue mechanics.

Primary sort by fit

High-fit on top.

The default SDR queue sorts by fit score descending. High-fit leads surface at the top. The SDR works down the queue until the end of the shift or the SLA timer forces attention elsewhere. The queue refreshes on new captures and score updates throughout the day.

Secondary sort by intent

Reply-active leads bubble up.

Within fit band the queue sorts by intent score descending. A high-fit lead with a recent reply surfaces above a high-fit lead that has gone cold. The intent signal catches the ready buyer who might otherwise sit in the queue by capture date.

SLA override

Breach-at-risk leads jump the queue.

A lead approaching SLA breach jumps the fit-score ranking to prevent the breach. The timer visibility on the lead card (red for under 20 percent remaining) prompts the SDR to work the lead regardless of fit. SLA discipline overrides fit prioritization because missing SLA is more expensive than deprioritizing a high-fit lead by two hours.

Routing-rule override

Enterprise leads jump to senior SDR.

Routing rules can override the default queue sort for specific segments. Enterprise leads (revenue over $500M) route to the senior SDR queue with a 2-hour SLA regardless of fit score. The admin configures routing rules in the admin console with declarative conditions.

Nurture deflection

Low-fit leads leave the queue.

Low-fit leads (scored under the tenant-set threshold) route to a nurture flow instead of SDR work. The nurture flow sends a polite auto-reply with resource links and schedules a monthly check-in email. The SDR time budget stays on high-fit work. The low-fit lead stays warm for a potential future conversion.

Queue health reporting

Depth, velocity, aging.

The manager report surfaces queue depth, queue velocity (leads worked per SDR per day), aging (leads over 7 days old), and SLA breach rate. The report drives SDR headcount decisions, segment routing tuning, and shift coverage. The manager sees the queue health weekly in the standard admin cadence.

What Strkr AI pulls into the score

The signals that drive fit and intent.

Strkr AI scoring pulls from the full record context including form fields, UTM parameters, prior engagement, firmographic enrichment, and the activity timeline. The buyer does not configure a provider or write a rule. The cards below walk through the signals Strkr AI considers.

Firmographic signals

Industry, revenue, employees, geography.

Firmographic signals feed the fit score heavily. Industry classification, revenue band, employee count, and geography map against the tenant-defined ideal customer profile. The admin configures ICP in the admin console as a short paragraph (not a 42-rule table). The scoring model reads the ICP and applies the match.

Behavioral signals

Website visits, email opens, replies, demos.

Behavioral signals feed the intent score. Website visit count, email open rate, reply activity, demo request, event attendance, content download. Signals arrive through the integration surface (Google Analytics, Segment, event tracking) with the standard webhook spec and feed the retrieval index for scoring.

UTM signals

The campaign that produced the capture.

UTM signals feed the fit score through campaign quality assessment. A high-fit campaign (e.g. a webinar for CROs in SaaS mid-market) produces generally high-fit leads. A low-fit campaign (e.g. a free content download with no gating) produces generally low-fit leads. The campaign quality learns over time as closed-won revenue ties back to campaigns.

Role signals

Title, seniority, buying authority.

Role signals feed the fit score through title parsing (VP, Director, Manager, Individual Contributor) and inferred buying authority. A VP of Revenue Operations is a decision-maker for a CRM purchase. A junior analyst is not. The signal weights into the fit score alongside firmographics and behavior.

Engagement timing

How fast is this lead responding.

Engagement timing feeds the intent score. A lead that replies within 10 minutes of the thank-you email scores higher than one that replies in 48 hours. A lead that visits the pricing page twice in one week scores higher than one that visits once in two months. The timing signal catches the ready buyer in the active research window.

Historical patterns

What similar leads did on this tenant.

The retrieval index indexes the full tenant history of leads, pipeline stages, and closed-won outcomes. Scoring draws on historical patterns (which lead profiles converted in the past, which stalled, which closed quickly) without the admin writing a rule. The scoring improves as the retrieval index deepens.

Head-to-head

Strkr vs a legacy CRM with rule-based lead scoring.

The comparison below is Strkr AI lead-scoring posture versus a legacy CRM with manually configured scoring rules.

Feature Strkr Legacy CRM with rule-based scoring
Score with reasoning text Two or three sentence explanation. Magic number only.
Fit and intent scoring separate Both scored, both visible on card. Fit score only typical.
Score updates on record change Real-time or batch per signal. Frozen at capture typical.
Rule maintenance burden ICP paragraph plus threshold tuning. 42 rules drift quarterly.
Firmographic enrichment Standard webhook spec, bring enrichment vendor. Separate add-on module typical.
Audit log on scoring calls Timestamp, user, context, reasoning. Score log only typical.
Queue sort by fit and intent Primary and secondary sort built in. Manual queue management.
SLA integration with scoring Breach-at-risk jumps queue. Separate SLA and score views.
Nurture deflection for low-fit Automatic routing to nurture flow. Manual deprioritization.
Pricing $49/mo add-on with 5,000 calls. Credit meter spike typical.
How teams use Strkr

Five lead-scoring playbooks.

The playbooks below are patterns Strkr onboarding sees across teams adopting Strkr AI lead scoring.

Pattern A

The 24-rep SaaS team replacing a 42-rule system.

A 24-rep SaaS team ran lead scoring in HubSpot with 42 manually configured rules. The rules drifted within a quarter and the SDR team ignored the score. Strkr onboarding ran an 18-business-day migration configuring the ICP as a short paragraph and tuning threshold bands. The AI scoring produced a trusted fit score in week two. SDR time budget shifted from gut feel to score-driven queue work. MQL-to-SAL conversion lifted 42 percent.

Pattern B

The 85-rep enterprise segmenting leads.

An 85-rep enterprise with SMB, Mid-Market, and Enterprise segments ran manual queue routing to the right SDR team. Routing errors sent SMB leads to the enterprise team roughly 11 percent of the time. Strkr onboarding configured segment-based routing with firmographic enrichment and AI fit scoring. Routing errors dropped to under 1 percent. Enterprise SDR time budget shifted from re-routing to selling.

Pattern C

The 11-rep startup with no legacy scoring.

An 11-rep startup building the sales motion from scratch had no legacy scoring to migrate. Strkr onboarding ran a 12-business-day setup configuring the ICP paragraph, the threshold bands, and the SDR queue ranking. The team enabled Strkr AI from day one and ran lead scoring across every capture. First-quarter MQL-to-SQL conversion landed at 42 percent with no SDR coaching on the scoring layer.

Pattern D

The 42-rep agency with intent-first scoring.

A 42-rep marketing agency ran lead scoring on fit only. Great-fit leads that were not timing-ready wasted SDR time, and medium-fit leads actively researching slipped through. Strkr onboarding added the intent score layer and configured the SDR queue to sort fit descending then intent descending. SDR response time to reply-active leads dropped from 90 minutes to 11 minutes. Deal cycle time dropped 24 percent on the intent-first cohort.

Pattern E

The 180-rep enterprise with compliance posture.

A 180-rep enterprise regulated under GDPR and HIPAA needed scoring with audit trail. Strkr onboarding ran a 32-business-day migration configuring the AI scoring with retrieval scope tightened to non-PHI fields on medical records and audit log retention set to 180 days. The compliance team ran monthly audit reviews. The firm cleared the HIPAA scoring posture and the SOC 2 Type II audit scope.

Score every lead with reasoning the SDR trusts.

Book a 30 minute call. We will walk through the AI fit and intent scoring, the SDR queue ranking, and the ICP tuning with your actual sales motion and segment definitions.

Common questions

What buyers in this bucket ask most.

How accurate is Strkr AI lead scoring compared to a trained human SDR?

On a 180-lead sample a trained human SDR takes 11 to 24 minutes to triage per lead with roughly 72 percent accuracy against the eventual closed-won outcome. Strkr AI scores the same sample in under 90 seconds total with roughly 78 percent accuracy. The accuracy advantage comes from the scoring model considering more signals (firmographic, behavioral, UTM, role, timing, historical) than a human SDR can hold in working memory. The speed advantage shifts SDR time from triage to conversation.

Can we tune the ICP that Strkr AI scores against?

Yes. The admin configures the ICP as a short paragraph in the admin console describing industry fit, revenue band, employee count, geography, technology stack, and buying authority. The scoring model reads the ICP and applies the match. The admin can tune the ICP as the sales motion evolves (expanding segment, entering new geography, shifting from SMB to Mid-Market). Historical scoring stays intact as a reference; new scoring reflects the updated ICP.

What happens to lead scoring if we disable the AI Enhancement add-on?

The AI Enhancement add-on is optional at $49 per month. If the team does not enable the module the CRM runs with manual qualification. The fit score and intent score turn off. The lead card shows the lifecycle stage, the SLA timer, and the activity timeline. The SDR triages manually using the standard pipeline view. The admin can enable the AI module at any time and the historical records index into the retrieval scope for future scoring.

Does Strkr AI train on our tenant data?

No. Strkr AI does not train on tenant data. The retrieval index indexes tenant data for retrieval during scoring but the backend model does not learn from tenant content. The data processing agreement explicitly prohibits training. The tenant can request export and deletion of the retrieval index at any time. For enterprise customers under a BAA or custom data processing agreement the training prohibition is explicitly reaffirmed.

How does Strkr handle enrichment data for fit scoring?

Strkr integrates with firmographic enrichment providers through the standard webhook spec. The admin brings their enrichment vendor (ZoomInfo, Clearbit, Apollo, LeadIQ, Lusha) and configures the webhook to populate missing fields on the record (revenue band, employee count, industry, technology stack). The enriched data feeds the fit score and surfaces on the record card with the source attribution. Strkr handles the integration surface, the admin brings the data source.

What is the compliance posture for Strkr AI scoring?

Strkr is GDPR and CCPA compliant today, HIPAA compliant with a BAA available on request, and SOC 2 Type II is in progress with target completion 2026-Q4. The AI scoring subsystem is in scope for SOC 2. The audit log captures timestamp, user, record context, retrieval scope, reasoning text summary, and the resulting score for every Strkr AI scoring call with 90-day default retention tunable per tenant. For regulated enterprise customers the retention tunes up to compliance-specified ceilings.

What does Strkr AI lead scoring cost compared to Clari, 6sense, or Bombora?

Strkr AI runs as an add-on at $49 per month with 5,000 calls included and $0.012 per call overage. For a 24-rep team the typical usage lands around 4,200 calls per month under the floor. Clari runs enterprise contracts around $45,000 to $120,000 per year. 6sense runs similar. Bombora intent data runs $12,000 to $45,000 per year depending on dataset. Strkr sits well below the dedicated scoring and intent vendors on sticker price with the scoring built into the CRM workflow rather than a sidebar panel.

Try it free. Bring your team next week.

No sales call, no migration consultant, no four-month implementation. Enter your card, get 14 days of the full Pro tier, cancel any time before day 14 with zero charge. Spin up a workspace, import your CSV, and have something useful before lunch.