Built for law firms running practice management

Legal practice management with matter workflow, AI drafting, and audit trail in one tool.

Legal practice management is matter workflow, billing integration, document assembly, and compliance posture in one place. Strkr ships the practice management core alongside AI drafting and the audit log so the firm runs on a single tenant without the stitched-together stack.

What this audience is actually dealing with

The pains that bring buyers here.

Legal practice management is where the firm runs daily operations: matter intake, conflict check, engagement, calendar, billable entry, invoice, trust accounting, and compliance. Legacy practice management tools (Clio, Smokeball, PracticePanther, MyCase, CosmoLex, Rocket Matter, LeanLaw) cover 60 to 80 percent of what a modern firm needs. The pain points below are what Strkr onboarding hears when firms evaluate a next-generation practice management tool.

The multi-tool stack

Matter in one tool, time in another, documents in a third.

A mid-size firm runs matter management in one tool (Clio), document assembly in a second (HotDocs, iManage), and conflict checks in a third (Access database or shared spreadsheet). Context lives everywhere. Strkr consolidates matter, document, conflict, and billing on a single tenant with the standard webhook spec for integrations the firm wants to keep.

The intake-to-matter gap

The web form that does not become a matter.

A firm website captures leads through a form that drops into email. Someone creates a matter in the practice management tool two days later. Attribution and context drift. Strkr unifies intake and matter so the submission creates a prospective client record on day one with the conflict check queued, the engagement letter drafted, and the matter ready to open on signature.

The billing lag

Billable entries entered on Friday for the whole week.

Attorneys enter billable time retroactively because the time entry UX in most practice management tools is tedious. The firm loses 11 to 24 percent of billable hours to memory decay. Strkr ties to Clio, Smokeball, MyCase, or PracticePanther through the standard webhook so time entry stays in the production tool with the UX the attorney prefers. Strkr becomes the matter cockpit.

The AI friction

Practice management with no AI, or AI with no privilege scope.

Legacy practice management tools either have no AI drafting capability or ship AI with no privilege-aware retrieval scope. The firm either does drafting manually or risks privilege leakage. Strkr AI runs with retrieval scope strictly bound to the matter and the client, drafts engagement letters, status updates, and billing narratives in the firm voice, and logs every call for audit.

The compliance ceiling

Retention policies that stop at 30 days.

State-bar rules require 5 to 7 years of client file retention depending on jurisdiction. Legacy practice management tools default to 30-day audit log retention. The firm has to upgrade to enterprise tier for compliance posture. Strkr audit log retention tunes per tenant up to compliance-specified ceilings without a tier jump.

The firm management visibility

The managing partner cannot see across books.

In a 25-partner firm each partner has 40 to 180 matters. The managing partner wants cross-firm views of pipeline, intake, billing, and realization. Most practice management tools are production tools, not practice management cockpits. Strkr role-based views give the managing partner a cross-firm cockpit without stepping on partner autonomy.

The practice management surface

Matter, intake, billing, and conflict in one tenant.

Strkr practice management covers the full firm operation on a single tenant. Matter workflow, intake form, conflict check, engagement letter, billable summary, trust monitoring, and compliance audit all land in the same tool with the standard integration surface for time trackers, document management systems, and accounting tools. The cards below walk through the surfaces.

Matter workflow

From intake to closing in one flow.

The matter workflow runs intake, conflict check, engagement, active work, billing, and resolution as a connected sequence with lifecycle gates. Each gate requires explicit action (conflict clear, engagement signed, retainer paid) before advancing. The admin configures gates per matter type (litigation, transactional, estate, family, immigration, corporate).

Intake form

Embedded form or hosted page.

The intake form embeds on the firm website or lands as a hosted page on a tenant subdomain. The form captures prospective client info, matter type, legal issue summary, and conflict parties. On submit the record creates with the conflict check queued, the AI-drafted intake summary ready, and the routing rule firing to the right attorney.

Conflict check

Automated against full firm history.

On intake Strkr runs an automated conflict check against the full firm client history. The check flags potential conflicts with context (prior representation details, opposing party overlaps, related matters) and routes to the managing partner for sign-off on edge cases. The conflict check history logs to the audit log.

Engagement letter

Draft, chase, sign, log.

The engagement letter workflow drafts the scope paragraph through Strkr AI, chases signature at days 7, 14, and 21, logs signature date, and ties the signed PDF to the matter record. For witnessed or notarized signatures Strkr integrates with third-party e-signature tools through the standard webhook spec.

Billable summary

Hours used versus budget on the matter card.

The billable summary pulls from the time tracker through the standard webhook spec and surfaces hours used versus budget on the matter card. Fixed-fee and capped matters show projected over-run flag. The partner reviews weekly and decides to scope back, request additional fee, or absorb.

Trust account monitoring

Client funds versus billable use.

For firms running IOLTA trust accounts Strkr tracks client funds held per matter versus billable use. The monitoring view surfaces matters where billable work has consumed trust funds and the client should be notified for replenishment per state-bar rules. The actual trust account lives in the firm bank and the accounting tool.

Audit log

Every event captured for bar-rule compliance.

The audit log captures every record read, record write, email send, document access, and AI call with 90-day default retention tunable per tenant up to state-bar ceilings. The managing partner runs audit reports for malpractice carrier reviews. The log clears on record deletion per retention policy.

Integrations that keep production tools

The firm stack Strkr ties to.

Strkr practice management does not force the firm to replace Clio, Smokeball, MyCase, QuickBooks, or iManage. The integration surface pulls data from production tools into Strkr while leaving the production tools in place. The cards below are the typical firm stack and how Strkr fits.

Time tracker tie

Clio, Smokeball, MyCase, PracticePanther.

Time trackers stay as the production system for time entry with the UX attorneys prefer. Strkr pulls billable entries, matter work history, and client contact through the standard webhook spec with HMAC signing. Bi-directional sync keeps the matter record and the time tracker aligned. For a 42-attorney firm the integration lands in an engineering sprint of one to two weeks.

Document management

iManage, NetDocuments, SharePoint, Google Drive.

DMS access tie through the standard webhook spec. Documents stay in the DMS as the system of record with the firm permission model intact. Strkr pulls document metadata and search context into the matter record so the attorney can find the right document without jumping between systems. The DMS access permissions carry over to the Strkr view.

Accounting tie

QuickBooks, Xero, Sage, NetSuite.

The accounting tool stays as the production system for invoicing, A/R aging, and financial reporting. Strkr pushes billable summaries and matter context to the accounting tool and pulls A/R status back into the matter record. The partner sees A/R aging on the matter card without opening the accounting tool.

Calendar sync

Outlook, Google Calendar.

Court deadlines, matter deadlines, and client meetings sync bi-directional with Outlook and Google Calendar. The attorney sees deadlines in the calendar app they already use. Strkr pushes updates when deadlines change and pulls back changes made in the calendar app.

E-signature

DocuSign, Dropbox Sign, Adobe Acrobat Sign.

For witnessed or notarized signatures Strkr integrates with third-party e-signature tools through the standard webhook spec. The engagement letter flow sends to the e-signature tool, routes through the witness or notary step, and the completed signed document returns to the matter record with the audit trail intact.

Court filing

eFileCA, PACER, state filing portals.

For litigation practices Strkr ties to state court e-filing portals through the standard webhook spec. The matter record carries the filing status with case number, filing date, and response deadline. For PACER access the integration pulls federal case data into the matter record for the covering attorney.

How Strkr AI serves practice management

The AI jobs that run across the firm.

Practice management AI cannot sound like a chatbot and cannot leak privileged content. Strkr AI runs with retrieval scope strictly bound to the matter and the client across every surface. The buyer never picks a model, never configures a provider. Strkr AI is an opt-in add-on at $49 per month with 5,000 calls included and $0.012 per call overage.

Engagement letter draft

Scope paragraph in the firm voice.

Strkr AI drafts the engagement letter scope paragraph from the client type, matter type, fee structure, and prior-matter scope. The partner reviews and tunes two sentences on average before sending. The draft lands in the firm voice because Strkr AI learns from the first 20 approved letters.

Intake summary

The post-call recap for the matter record.

After an intake call Strkr AI drafts the matter intake summary with client situation, legal issues identified, representation scope, fee quote range, and recommended next step. The intake coordinator routes to the attorney for engagement decision.

Status update

The regular matter touchpoint.

For active matters Strkr AI drafts a status update email summarizing recent work, upcoming deadlines, and open client decisions. The attorney reviews and sends. Status update cadence lifts from monthly to weekly because the draft removes the time cost.

Billing narrative

The invoice line in plain English.

Monthly invoice generation requires plain-English descriptions per billable entry. Strkr AI drafts the client-visible description from the attorney internal task note, which keeps privilege-sensitive internal detail off the invoice. The billing partner reviews before sending.

Court deadline prep

The internal note for the response.

Before a court deadline Strkr AI drafts an internal prep note for the attorney with filing type, response requirements, prior related filings, and recommended work scope. The attorney delegates task work to the associate team.

Renewal recommendation

The year-end representation review.

For retainer clients Strkr AI drafts a year-end representation review summarizing past-year matters, hours used versus budget, scope expansion opportunities, and recommended fee adjustment. The managing partner tunes and presents in the renewal conversation.

Head-to-head

Strkr vs a dedicated practice management tool.

The comparison below is Strkr practice management posture versus a dedicated practice management tool like Clio Manage or MyCase.

Feature Strkr Dedicated practice management tool
Matter workflow with lifecycle gates Tunable gates per matter type. Fixed workflow typical.
Intake form embedded in website Native with routing rules. Separate add-on module.
Conflict check against full history Automated with partner sign-off. Manual process typical.
AI drafting in firm voice Engagement, status, billing, prep. None or sidebar chatbot.
Audit log retention Tunable to state-bar ceiling. 30 days typical, enterprise upsell.
Managing partner cockpit Role-based cross-firm view. Production view only typical.
Integration surface REST, GraphQL, webhooks, OpenAPI. Marketplace with limited scope.
HIPAA BAA for health law Available on request. Enterprise tier gate.
Custom-object flexibility Admin can extend any object. Fixed schema typical.
Monthly cost for 25 attorneys $1,475 per month with 14-day trial. $1,500 to $2,500 per month typical.
How teams use Strkr

Five practice management playbooks.

The playbooks below are patterns Strkr onboarding sees across law firm practice management deployments.

Pattern A

The 14-attorney boutique firm consolidating stack.

A 14-attorney boutique estate planning firm ran Clio for time, iManage for documents, Access database for conflict checks, and shared Google Sheets for pipeline. Strkr onboarding ran a 14-business-day migration consolidating pipeline, conflict check, and matter workflow into Strkr with Clio and iManage staying as production tools through the standard webhook. The partner reclaimed about 8 hours per week.

Pattern B

The 42-attorney litigation firm.

A 42-attorney litigation firm ran Smokeball for time tracking, a custom Access database for conflict checks, and a tangle of Outlook calendars for court deadlines. Strkr onboarding ran a 24-business-day migration consolidating conflict check, court deadline tracking, and matter management into Strkr with Smokeball staying for time tracking. Court deadline misses dropped from four to zero in the first six months.

Pattern C

The 85-attorney mid-size regional firm.

An 85-attorney mid-size regional firm serving corporate, litigation, and transactional practice groups ran a legacy practice management system drifted over 14 years. Strkr onboarding ran a 32-business-day migration consolidating onto Strkr with practice-group-specific pipeline configurations. Each practice group kept its own matter triage view while the managing partner retained a cross-firm cockpit.

Pattern D

The 25-attorney immigration practice.

A 25-attorney immigration law practice ran case-type specific intake across H-1B, L-1, EB-5, O-1, family-based, and asylum. Legacy stack was INSZoom and shared Google Sheets. Strkr onboarding configured case-type specific matter configurations and government filing deadline tracking. AI-drafted status updates in Mandarin, Spanish, and Portuguese covered the firm multi-language client base.

Pattern E

The 32-attorney health law practice under HIPAA.

A 32-attorney health law practice served medical practice clients, which brought PHI into matter detail. Strkr delivered the BAA on request and configured AI retrieval scope to exclude PHI fields. The migration ran in 24 business days. The firm added seven new medical-group clients in the first full year on Strkr.

Run practice management on a CRM shaped for matter work.

Book a 30 minute call. We will walk through the practice management surfaces, the integration surface for your production tools, and the compliance posture with your actual firm structure.

Common questions

What buyers in this bucket ask most.

Can Strkr replace Clio, Smokeball, or MyCase entirely?

For some firms yes. For most firms Strkr complements the existing time tracker as a matter cockpit while leaving the time tracker in place for time entry UX. The practice management workflow (intake, conflict check, engagement letter, matter workflow, document chase, status updates, audit log) consolidates in Strkr. Time entry stays in Clio or Smokeball because the attorney already has that muscle memory. The bi-directional sync keeps the matter record aligned across both tools.

How does Strkr handle state-bar retention requirements for client files?

Strkr audit log retention tunes per tenant up to state-bar ceilings. The default is 90 days but the admin can configure retention to 5, 7, or 10 years depending on jurisdiction. The underlying matter records, documents, and client correspondence retain according to the standard tenant data retention policy, which does not auto-delete without explicit admin action. The firm can produce the full client file for a bar-rule records request without delay.

Can we migrate from a legacy practice management tool?

Yes. Strkr onboarding runs migrations from Clio Manage, PracticePanther, MyCase, Smokeball, CosmoLex, Rocket Matter, LeanLaw, and legacy custom systems. Typical migration for a 42-attorney firm runs 22 to 28 business days end to end. The migration preserves full client history, matter history, note history, email history, and document attachments with original timestamps. The AI retrieval index sees the full history on day one.

What does Strkr cost compared to Clio Manage or MyCase?

Strkr runs flat per seat at $29 on Starter, $59 on Pro, and $119 on Scale per user per month, with a 14-day trial. For a 25-attorney firm on Pro the monthly spend runs $1,475 for seats plus $49 for AI Enhancement if enabled. Clio Manage runs around $69 to $139 per user per month depending on tier. MyCase runs around $49 to $99 per user per month. Smokeball runs around $89 to $179 per user per month. Strkr sits in the mid-range on seat price and overlaps on 70 to 80 percent of practice management features with deeper AI capability and custom-object schema flexibility.

How does Strkr handle multi-partner books of business?

The role model gives each partner ownership of their book with full control over client data, workflow, and billing. The managing partner gets a read-only cross-firm view (configurable per role) for pipeline, intake, document chase, and billable hours. Partners can share specific clients across the firm (a shared advisory engagement, a cross-practice matter) through explicit record sharing. The audit log records every cross-partner view for trust posture.

What is the compliance posture for a legal practice management migration?

Strkr is HIPAA compliant with a BAA available on request (relevant for health law practices), GDPR and CCPA compliant today, and SOC 2 Type II is in progress with target completion 2026-Q4. Integration tokens live in AWS KMS, platform credentials live in AWS Secrets Manager. The audit log captures every record read and write with retention tunable per tenant. SSO (SAML and OIDC) is live on Scale through Clerk, MFA with TOTP and text-based verification is live, Verified Domains are live on Scale.

Can Strkr handle both transactional and litigation practice workflows?

Yes. The matter workflow configures per matter type with practice-area-specific lifecycle gates. For litigation practices the pipeline view flips to court deadline triage ranking matters by response deadline. For transactional practices the view flips to matter closing timeline ranking by expected closing date. Firms with multiple practice groups (corporate, litigation, estate, family) run each practice group with its own matter configuration while the managing partner retains the cross-firm cockpit.

Try it free. Bring your team next week.

No sales call, no migration consultant, no four-month implementation. Enter your card, get 14 days of the full Pro tier, cancel any time before day 14 with zero charge. Spin up a workspace, import your CSV, and have something useful before lunch.