Should my team move from Salesforce to Strkr?
Depends on three factors. First, team size and motion complexity: Strkr fits Series B through mid-market B2B cleanly up to roughly 500 reps; above that the Salesforce depth matters more. Second, AppExchange dependency: if your motion depends on nCino, Veeva, FinancialForce, Rootstock, or similar specialist packages, staying on Salesforce is usually the right call. Third, admin team maturity: if you have multiple certified admins already on staff with sunk investment in apex code, migration cost often exceeds the per-seat savings. The honest advice is to list these three factors first and demo both tools against your actual motion before committing.
What does a Salesforce-to-Strkr migration actually cost?
Typical mid-market migrations run 8 to 16 weeks of calendar time with internal effort of 150 to 400 hours spread across RevOps, sales admin, and executive review. Strkr provides a migration-assistance program at no additional cost for teams of 30 or more seats, covering the field mapping phase and the pilot shadow coordination. For teams below 30 seats, the self-service migration path uses the Salesforce export tooling and the Strkr import pipeline. The all-in migration cost is dramatically lower than a comparable Salesforce initial implementation because the admin surface does not require certified-admin expertise.
What happens to our Salesforce AppExchange packages at migration?
Business-critical specialist packages (nCino, Veeva, FinancialForce, Rootstock, industry-specific CPQ) typically stay on Salesforce as a specialist system with Strkr as the operational CRM, with data flowing via the open API. General-purpose packages (notification tools, lead-enrichment extensions, email tools) are usually replaced by native Strkr capability. The audit phase (weeks 1 to 3 of migration) identifies which packages fall into which category and the field-mapping phase handles the integration wiring.
How does Strkr handle apex code and complex Salesforce automation?
Salesforce apex code and complex flows translate into Strkr automation primitives (flow canvas, agent nodes, approval chains, computed fields). Most apex logic for routing, scoring, approval, and notification translates cleanly. Deeply custom apex that implements industry-specific business logic (specialized financial calculations, pharma field-sales rules, telecom circuit-management) may require a Strkr custom-object plus flow configuration or an external service called via API. The audit phase identifies which apex code falls into which bucket.
Does Strkr have an equivalent to Salesforce Agentforce?
Yes. Strkr AI covers the common Agentforce use cases: pipeline review drafting, inbox reply drafts, summaries from imported transcripts, forecast narrative, lead enrichment, deal health scoring. The pricing posture differs: Strkr AI is a predictable opt-in add-on module at $49 per month with 5,000 calls included and $0.012 per call after, so finance can forecast the AI line rather than reconciling a Flex credit meter. For teams running AI heavily, the pricing posture typically produces measurable savings.
What is the all-in annual cost comparison for a 50-rep mid-market team?
Salesforce Enterprise at 165 per user per month for 50 reps is 99 thousand dollars annually in license alone. Add typical implementation partner retainer at 60 to 110 thousand annually, plus Agentforce Flex credits for a team using AI at production velocity at 3 to 6 thousand monthly (36 to 72 thousand annually), the all-in Salesforce cost lands at 195 to 280 thousand annually for a mature deployment. Strkr for the same 50 reps on the flat per-seat plan with AI, forecast, projects, and all features included lands at roughly 40 to 60 thousand annually depending on tier. The delta is typically 150 to 220 thousand dollars annually, which usually reinvests in headcount.