Pricing for Agencies

The CRM pricing shape agencies survive on.

Most CRM pricing was built for product companies with one database and one revenue motion. Agencies get a different pricing experience: contact tiers that climb every time the newsletter list grows, a Service Hub add-on the second a client portal is needed, a project tool invoiced per board, and a marketing automation line that reprices every January. Strkr is flat per seat with every module included, so the price tracks the one metric an agency can actually plan around.

Start free trial See pricing
Why buyers are here

Agencies: how CRM pricing actually breaks.

Agencies at 15 to 150 people run concurrent client engagements against a shared delivery pool, which means CRM pricing hits them from four directions at once. The database grows faster than headcount because every client adds a marketing list. The delivery team scales into the Service Hub tier because the client portal lives there. The project tool gets priced per board as the account team spins up new engagements. The marketing automation line reprices every renewal because the contact count ticked over a threshold. By year three, the budget line that was supposed to be CRM has quietly become five separate invoices with five renewal clocks, and nobody on the team can give the owner a straight number for what the stack costs per client. The pain points below are the ones agency operations leads walk us through on evaluation calls, and the common thread is that the pricing shape is wrong before the headline rate even gets discussed.

Contact-tier escalator

The newsletter list is a tax on growth.

HubSpot prices marketing on contact tiers. The agency ships a lead magnet, the gated content works, the list grows from forty thousand to sixty thousand over a year of good content marketing, and the renewal invoice climbs the next tier automatically. The agency pays for the privilege of its own marketing success. The deeper problem is that the price shape rewards shrinking the list, which is the exact opposite of what a marketing agency sells to its clients. The pricing model argues against the pitch deck every month, and the finance team is the one who notices first.

Service Hub trap

The client portal is behind a paywall.

The agency needs a client-facing portal to deliver monthly reports, campaign dashboards, and shared status pages. On the HubSpot path that lives in Service Hub, which is a separate purchase with its own tier structure and seat model. The portal is table stakes for an agency that charges five figures a month, but it is priced like a premium add-on rather than a core capability. Many agencies spend six months evaluating Service Hub, decide the ratio is wrong, and ship status updates as PDFs instead. The client experience suffers because the pricing shape made the right answer uneconomic.

Per-board project tax

Every new engagement is a new invoice.

Monday and ClickUp both price their project workspaces at a per-board or per-workspace level once the account grows past a handful of projects. An agency with forty active engagements ends up with forty boards, which gets re-priced into the next tier, which usually means an unlock pricing conversation at renewal. The agency is being charged for growth again, in a tool that is supposed to help the agency serve more clients. The pricing shape is sideways to the business motion, and the account team starts gaming it by cramming three clients into one board, which breaks reporting on the delivery side.

Per-user plus contact

Two axes of price, both compounding.

HubSpot Marketing Hub bills on both seats and contacts, which means an agency adding a junior strategist to help with campaign work increases the bill twice: once for the seat and once because the strategist adds to the contact owner count that lives inside the tier math. Pipedrive, ActiveCampaign, and most of the field do the same thing with slightly different flavors. The agency finance team cannot forecast the next renewal from headcount alone because the second axis moves on its own. Budgeting becomes a quarterly surprise rather than a planning exercise, which is the single most consistent complaint we hear from agency CFOs.

The five-tool stack

CRM, PM, email, time, invoicing, five renewals.

The typical mid-sized agency pays for HubSpot Starter or Pro, Monday or Asana, Mailchimp or ActiveCampaign, Harvest or Toggl, and QuickBooks or Xero. Five vendors, five renewal clocks, five admin surfaces, five sets of seat math. The combined bill grows roughly three to four times faster than headcount through the 15 to 50 person band because each tool has its own tier escalator. The agency owner cannot tell you the total cost per client without a spreadsheet, and the spreadsheet is out of date by the end of the quarter. The pricing shape across the stack is the problem, not any single tool.

Renewal surprises

The number only shows up at renewal.

The one unifying pattern across the agency pricing experience: the real cost is only visible at renewal, usually with a short window to decide. Marketing contacts crossed a tier in month seven, Service Hub was added mid-year for one client ask, Monday added a department, and the three invoices that showed up on autopilot now stack to a number nobody budgeted. The ops lead negotiates for a week, trims a tier, and the cycle resets. Agencies that run on a flat per-seat shape get the opposite experience: headcount changes, the invoice changes, and nothing else moves. Finance can forecast CRM cost the way they forecast rent.

The right pricing shape

What flat per seat means for an agency.

Pricing shape determines what the agency can plan around. A flat per-seat shape with every module included means the invoice only changes when headcount changes, and headcount is already the one number the agency plans. There is no second axis, no tier threshold, no add-on cloud, no per-board tax, no renewal surprise. The cards below describe what that unlocks for the agency motion specifically, from the newsletter growth story to the client portal to the project volume to the finance team being able to forecast three years out without a spreadsheet.

List grows, price does not

Marketing success stops being taxed.

A flat per-seat shape prices the agency on billable headcount, not on the size of the database. The newsletter list grows from forty thousand to a hundred and twenty thousand over three years of content marketing, and the invoice does not move. The agency can run the content strategy it sells to clients without an internal debate about whether this quarter is the one that trips the next tier. The pricing argument lines up with the pitch argument.

Portal in the box

Client reporting is a module, not an add-on.

Docs module ships with scoped read access per client, which is the primitive an agency needs to deliver monthly status, campaign dashboards, and milestone updates on a stable URL. There is no Service Hub tier to unlock and no portal seat to add. The agency can offer a portal to every client from day one, which is often the single clearest differentiator against a competitor still emailing PDFs.

Projects without the tax

Every engagement, same price.

Projects module lives on the account record and bills nothing extra per project, per board, or per workspace. An agency growing from twenty engagements to eighty engagements over two years of good growth sees the same per-seat line it always had. The account team is never incentivized to cram three clients onto one project to dodge a pricing threshold.

Delivery team priced like the sales team

Seats are seats.

An agency has delivery staff on the same cost line as sales staff. The pricing model should treat them the same way. A flat per-seat shape with every module included means a delivery lead and an account director cost the same seat, and both can touch the client record directly without a secondary tool. The delivery team does not get shunted onto a read-only tier because the price got expensive.

Marketing on every tier

Automation is not a separate purchase.

Email sequences, landing pages, forms, segmentation, and campaign attribution ship on every paid tier with no contact-tier escalator and no add-on. The marketing team starts on day one, and the agency uses the same stack it pitches to clients. The pricing shape makes the demo environment the agency itself, which is the strongest sales asset a marketing agency can carry into a prospect call.

Finance can forecast

The three-year number is a straight line.

With one axis of price (seats), the CFO can project three years of CRM spend from the hiring plan. No second axis, no tier logic, no add-on scenario planning. The CRM line item behaves the way the rent line item behaves: it only changes when the agency decides to change something, which is the exact financial posture a growing agency needs during a planning cycle.

One invoice, one renewal

Replace four bills with one line.

CRM, Marketing, Projects, Docs, and Messaging on the same invoice. One renewal clock to track, one admin surface, one data model, one place to add a seat. The ops lead stops running the stack audit every quarter, and the integrations line disappears entirely for the four tools that got collapsed. The remaining tool count drops to the accounting system (QuickBooks or Xero) and whatever the finance team already uses.

Messaging as a module

SMS and MMS without a side-car.

Native messaging ships as a module with the same flat per-seat treatment. Agencies running appointment confirmations, launch alerts, or SMS campaigns on behalf of clients run the messaging motion on the same records as the CRM. BYO Twilio is supported for agencies with an existing carrier relationship, and the carrier passthrough stays transparent on the invoice.

E-sign through integrations

DocuSign and PandaDoc on native hooks.

Strkr Docs is the wiki and client portal layer. For signed SOWs, Strkr integrates with DocuSign and PandaDoc through native connectors so merge-field scopes route for signature without a Zap in the middle. The agency keeps whichever e-sign vendor is already standard without paying a second CRM invoice for the privilege.

Comparing stacks honestly

The real agency comparison is not one tool.

Most buyers come to the pricing conversation thinking they are comparing Strkr to HubSpot Pro or Strkr to Monday CRM. The real comparison for an agency is Strkr to the whole stack: HubSpot Pro plus Teamwork or Monday plus Mailchimp plus Harvest plus a document tool, five renewals, five admin surfaces, two or three contact-tier escalators embedded in the invoices. The cards below sketch the comparison the way an agency CFO would run it, with the pricing shapes on the competitor side left intact so the buyer can audit their own stack against the pattern.

HubSpot Pro contact tiers

Marketing contacts are the second axis.

HubSpot Marketing Hub Pro starts around a public rate for a few thousand contacts and escalates in tiers of ten thousand. The agency that lands at the five-thousand-contact tier in month one is usually at the twenty-five-thousand tier by month eighteen if content is working. The jump between tiers is not linear and the renewal is where it bites. For agencies, the HubSpot path is not expensive at the start, it gets expensive after the agency starts winning.

Service Hub Pro

The portal costs a separate purchase.

The client portal, knowledge base, and ticket pipeline live in Service Hub, which is a separate seat count and a separate tier structure. Agencies that want portals for every client end up on Service Hub Pro with meaningful seat counts, which is often a line that was not in the original CRM budget. The number is real and the ops lead usually discovers it four months into using the Starter tier.

Monday CRM board math

Boards and workspaces push tiers.

Monday CRM prices on seats, but Monday the project tool prices on seats and board count and workspace count. Agencies that run project delivery in Monday hit the per-workspace limit around twenty to thirty active engagements and get escalated to the Pro or Enterprise tier. The CRM side and the project side are the same vendor but different billing logic, which the finance team learns the hard way.

Teamwork and ClickUp

PM tools reprice features.

Teamwork and ClickUp both charge extra for Gantt views, time tracking, custom fields past a threshold, and workload views. The agency building a project motion ends up on the premium tier because the basic tier does not include utilization reporting, which is the one view the agency needs. The headline price gets quoted, and the actual price lands two tiers up.

Mailchimp list math

Contact tiers again, cheaper floor.

Mailchimp is the common cheap-starter path for agencies, and the pricing is also contact-tiered. The floor is lower than HubSpot, but the ceiling rises the same way as the newsletter list grows. The second problem is that Mailchimp does not share a database with the CRM, so the agency pays for the contact tier and also pays the admin cost of keeping two lists in sync. The headline price is only half the real cost.

Harvest and Toggl time

Per-seat time, per-seat invoicing add-on.

Harvest and Toggl both price on seats and both charge extra for the invoicing module an agency needs to tie time entries to invoices. The headline price is modest per seat, but the invoicing uplift and the premium tier for team reporting push the real line twice as high. The deeper issue is that neither tool shares an account record with the CRM, so utilization reporting lives in a CSV export rather than a live view.

What the shape unlocks for the business

The operating moves that only work on flat per-seat.

Pricing shape is not an abstract preference. It controls which operating moves the agency can run and which ones get taxed into irrelevance. The moves below are the ones agency operators tell us they wanted to run but could not justify on their old stack because the pricing math argued against them. Each one gets economically viable when the invoice is flat per seat and every module is in the box, and taken together they describe the operational maturity curve an agency usually climbs over the first two years on the new shape.

Content without caution

The newsletter list can run.

When the invoice does not move with database size, the content team ships the gated content calendar they wanted to ship. The list grows, the pipeline grows, and the finance team is not watching for the next contact-tier threshold. The content strategy the agency sells to clients can finally run inside the agency without a pricing argument.

Portal on every account

The client experience is upgraded.

With Docs in the box, every client gets a portal from day one. Monthly status, campaign dashboards, scope summaries, and milestone updates run on a stable URL. The agency differentiates on client experience in the sales cycle, which is one of the clearest patterns in agency win rates on retainer competitive pitches.

Projects per client, not per board

Engagement count stops gating the stack.

Agencies model one project per engagement without an internal argument about per-board math. The reporting stays clean because each client has their own project, time entries land where they should, and utilization math works at the account level without a cross-system join. The pricing shape makes the right data model economically viable.

Utilization on a weekly cadence

The margin lever becomes a view.

Native time entries plus the account record plus the project record means utilization is a live view, not a Friday export. The weekly ops review runs on real numbers. Agencies that put utilization on the weekly dashboard typically recover 4 to 6 points of gross margin inside two quarters, and the move only works when the data lives on one system, which only pencils when the pricing shape does not charge extra for the second module.

Retainer renewal 90-day motion

The clock becomes a system.

A nightly flow looks 90 days ahead at retainer end dates, creates a renewal opportunity, and assigns the account director. The motion drops churn on retainers by eliminating the renewal-by-surprise case. The motion is only free to build when flows are in the box rather than a separate automation tier, which is one more example of pricing shape determining operating maturity.

Scope creep as a change order

The 90 percent alert pays for itself.

When a project crosses 90 percent of its scoped hours or budget, Strkr fires an alert. The conversation with the client becomes a scheduled chat and a signed change order instead of an absorbed overage. Agencies that run this motion typically recover meaningful margin in the first quarter, and the alert is a flow that takes an afternoon to build.

QBR packet drafting

The quarterly review runs on autopilot.

Ten days before each QBR, Strkr AI drafts the client review packet: last-quarter wins, campaign performance, scope delivered, scope in flight, open commitments, suggested expansion. The account director reviews, edits, and presents. The pricing shape puts AI drafting on every tier rather than an add-on cloud, which is the move that makes the motion repeatable at scale.

Win-back for churned retainers

Lost clients stay in a nurture.

Churned retainers enter a 12 to 24 month marketing track. Agencies that run this motion typically get roughly 10 to 15 percent of churned clients back inside two years. The motion needs marketing automation on the same records as the churned account, which only works when the marketing module shares the database with the CRM, which only pencils when the pricing shape bundles them.

Head-to-head

Strkr vs the HubSpot plus Teamwork plus Mailchimp stack.

The honest side-by-side on pricing shape for a mid-sized agency. HubSpot Marketing Hub Pro plus Service Hub plus Teamwork or Monday plus Mailchimp is the typical shape for an agency in the 15 to 150 person band. The table reads the price shape rather than the headline rate, which is the comparison the finance team runs when they are shown both sides on the same page. Public competitor rates are summarized in the right column so the buyer can audit their own invoice against the pattern.

What matters Strkr HubSpot Pro + Teamwork/Monday + Mailchimp
Pricing shape Flat per seat, every module included Seats plus contact tiers plus per-board plus add-on hubs
Marketing contacts List grows, invoice does not move Tiered every 10,000 contacts, renewal reprice
Client portal Docs module included on every paid tier Service Hub Pro separate purchase, separate seats
Project delivery Projects module on the same records, unlimited projects Teamwork or Monday priced per seat and per workspace
Time tracking and utilization Native time entries, utilization roll-up by person and project Harvest or Toggl separate, CSV import to report
Marketing automation Included on every paid tier, same database as CRM Marketing Hub Pro or Mailchimp, contact-tier priced
SOW generation and e-sign Docs merge fields plus DocuSign or PandaDoc integration Google Docs plus DocuSign plus manual send
Messaging (SMS and MMS) Native module, BYO Twilio supported Not native, requires a separate messaging add-on
Admin burden One system, one admin surface, one invoice Four to five vendors, four renewals, integration maintenance
Three-year total cost shape Scales with headcount, nearly linear Scales with contacts, projects, and hub count, non-linear

Pricing that scales with the hiring plan, not the newsletter list.

Start a 14-day trial with CRM, Marketing, Projects, Messaging, Docs, and Flows all enabled from day one. Migrate from HubSpot, Pipedrive, Monday, Asana, and Mailchimp with the built-in importers. See the current per-seat rate and annual terms on the pricing page.

See pricing See the CRM
Common questions

Agencies pricing FAQ.

Why does Strkr not list a specific dollar amount per seat on this page?

The pricing page carries the current seat rate, discount tiers, and annual terms. This page is deliberately about pricing shape, which is the thing that changes the three-year number for an agency. The headline rate matters, but the shape matters more: an agency on a flat per-seat shape with every module in the box is paying a different line item than an agency on a contact-tier plus Service Hub plus per-board stack, even when the two headline rates look similar in month one. The link in the closing CTA goes to the full pricing page with current numbers.

How does the HubSpot contact-tier escalator actually affect an agency?

HubSpot Marketing Hub Pro prices by marketing contacts in tiers of roughly ten thousand. An agency that lands at the five-thousand-contact tier in month one typically crosses into the fifteen-to-twenty-five thousand band by month twelve if the content strategy is working. The renewal invoice climbs the next tier automatically. The deeper issue is that the shape rewards shrinking the list, which is the exact opposite of what a marketing agency sells. The pricing argument is on the wrong side of the pitch deck. Strkr flat per-seat removes that argument entirely because the database size does not change the invoice.

How does Monday CRM pricing compare for a mid-sized agency?

Monday CRM is seat-priced, and Monday the project tool is seat-priced plus workspace-tier priced. Agencies running delivery in Monday hit the per-workspace limit around twenty to thirty active engagements and get escalated to the Pro or Enterprise tier at renewal. The CRM side and the project side are the same vendor but different billing logic. The pattern is similar to HubSpot: the headline rate is modest at the start, the shape bites after the agency starts winning. Strkr prices only on seats, which means project count can grow without triggering a tier conversation.

What happens when an agency grows from 15 to 150 people on Strkr pricing?

The invoice scales with headcount in a straight line. Every seat gets the full product (CRM, Marketing, Projects, Docs, Messaging, Flows) at the same per-seat rate. There is no second axis of price, no contact-tier escalator, no Service Hub unlock, no per-board tax on the project module, no premium tier for utilization reporting. The CFO can forecast three years of CRM spend from the hiring plan without a spreadsheet. The admin surface stays the same whether the agency is at 15 or 150 seats, which is the one pattern most agency operators care about for operational maturity.

Does Strkr do e-signature natively or is that an integration?

Strkr Docs is the wiki, client portal, and merge-field document surface. For signed SOWs, change orders, and MSAs, Strkr integrates natively with DocuSign and PandaDoc so a merge-field document routes for signature from inside Strkr without a middleman. Agencies that already standardized on one of those e-sign vendors keep that relationship. The agency does not pay a second CRM invoice for e-sign, and the signed document lands back on the opportunity record automatically.

What happens to the existing tool stack after a switch?

Most agencies collapse four of the five tools: the CRM (HubSpot or Pipedrive), the project tool (Monday or Asana or Teamwork), the time tracker (Harvest or Toggl), and the marketing automation (Mailchimp or ActiveCampaign). The accounting tool (QuickBooks or Xero) stays, because invoices still land there for the accountant. The e-sign tool (DocuSign or PandaDoc) stays as a native integration. The result is one Strkr invoice plus one accounting invoice plus one e-sign invoice, where there used to be five renewals and five admin surfaces.

Also considering

Related pricing views.

Pricing for Small Business Pricing for Mid-Market Pricing for Startups Pricing for RevOps Pricing for Sales Managers Pricing for Founders

Try it free. Bring your team next week.

No sales call, no migration consultant, no four-month implementation. Enter your card, get 14 days of the full Pro tier, cancel any time before day 14 with zero charge. Spin up a workspace, import your CSV, and have something useful before lunch.

Start free trial See pricing