What is an AI workflow and how is it different from a workflow with a webhook to an AI service?
An AI workflow treats the model as a first-class step inside the automation canvas, with typed inputs, typed outputs, retries, idempotency keys, timeouts, guardrails, and observability on par with every other node. A workflow that calls an AI service via webhook treats the model as an opaque outbound HTTP call, which means retries can double-send, outputs are untyped blobs the next step has to parse, and the audit trail lives in two places. Strkr ships native AI steps so the admin drags a Classify, Extract, Draft, Score, Summarize, Decide, Compare, or Verify node onto the canvas the same way they drag a database write, and every step honors the same contract the rest of the flow does.
Does Strkr charge per AI call or meter credits for AI workflow steps?
No. Strkr AI runs on every paid tier with no per-call credit meter. The seat price covers model usage inside flows at normal operating volume. Admins build flows that run millions of times a month without a procurement conversation about overage, which is the main reason comparable AI workflow builders quietly stall out six months after launch. Rate caps exist as a safety mechanism against misconfigured upstream webhooks firing in a loop, but they are a protection against runaway flows, not a billing meter.
Which AI step types does Strkr ship, and what do they do?
Nine native step types: Classify (label from a short list with confidence), Extract (pull structured fields from unstructured text against a schema), Draft (compose email, SMS, or note in the tenant voice), Score (number plus three reasons), Summarize (compress long text to a target length with required sections), Decide (pick a branch from candidate options), Compare (rank two options against a criterion), Verify (check an output against rules before hand-off), and Chain (feed one AI step directly into another with typed hand-offs). Every step runs under the same retries, timeouts, idempotency keys, guardrails, and audit logging as every other node on the flow canvas.
How are permissions and data residency handled for AI workflow steps?
AI steps run under the effective permissions of the flow service account, which means they inherit row-level and field-level permissions from the tenant. A step cannot read a record the service account cannot read and cannot write a field outside the admin-configured allowlist. Prompts, inputs, and outputs are tenant-isolated and are not used to train the shared model. Fields marked PII are masked before the model sees the row. Residency pinning keeps the request, response, and logs inside a chosen region, and the step validator fails any flow that attempts to escape the pinned region.
Can we require human review on specific AI workflow steps before the output is sent or written?
Yes. Every AI step carries a human-in-the-loop toggle. When on, the step emits a task on a configured owner, pauses the flow, and resumes when the owner approves or edits the output. Admins commonly flip the toggle on for outbound messaging (email, SMS) and leave it off for internal scoring and classification. Flows marked production require a second admin to approve changes, prompt version history records every edit with a diff, and export controls log who viewed which AI step input, so compliance has a complete audit trail without maintaining a parallel system.
What are the most common AI workflow patterns teams build first in Strkr?
The top patterns our tenants build in the first week: inbound lead triage (classify, score, enrich, route in under eight seconds), inbound email router (Sales/Support/Billing/human), deal risk scorer (nightly rescore plus three reasons), churn watcher (multi-signal tier changes), note enricher (dictation to structured outcome), renewal composer (draft pitch 120 days out), expansion play fire (white space signal to booked meeting), invoice extractor (PDF to structured record), and lead reactivation (old closed-lost to fresh conversation). Each ships in under thirty minutes on the canvas and runs on real records on day one. All of them inherit the governance posture configured on the tenant.