What is a marketing workflow and how is it different from marketing automation?
Marketing automation is the engine that composes, personalizes, schedules, and sends campaigns. A marketing workflow is the shape of the human operator and reviewer work around the campaign: who writes the brief, who approves it, who writes the copy, who QA-checks before launch, who runs the launch, who monitors the live campaign, and who runs the retrospective. The two work best when they share records. In Strkr, the campaign brief, approval chain, QA checklist, launch task list, monitoring dashboard, and retrospective all live on the same campaign record the marketing automation engine runs against. One canvas carries the whole arc from idea to closed campaign, which eliminates the sync problem between a task tool and the automation engine.
How does the approval chain work for marketing campaigns in Strkr?
Each campaign brief lists the required approvers in order (marketing manager, brand, legal, product, exec sponsor) with configured SLAs per step. Each approver has a specific scope: brand reviews brand elements, legal reviews legal elements, product reviews technical accuracy, exec sponsor reviews the strategic fit. The reviewer approves, requests changes, or rejects from inside Strkr. A change request routes the brief back to the operator with the specific notes attached. The system escalates to a backup approver if the primary breaches the SLA, so campaigns do not sit for a week waiting on a reviewer on holiday. The campaign cannot advance to the launch gate until every approver has signed off, which is enforced by the system rather than by operator discipline.
How does the launch gate prevent campaigns from shipping with holes?
The launch button is disabled until the approval chain is complete and the QA checklist is clear. The QA checklist combines automated technical checks (link functionality, image loading, dynamic field rendering, policy verification) with manual sign-offs (brand voice, strategic fit, tone). Automated checks fire on every save and surface issues in real time. Manual sign-offs appear on the checklist with named owners. The campaign cannot ship with a dangling approval or an unchecked QA item. The gate is not a convention; the system enforces it. The outcome is that well-meaning operators cannot ship campaigns under time pressure with a missed step, which eliminates the specific failure mode that produces most pre-launch bugs.
How does Strkr compare to Monday.com for marketing workflow management?
Monday.com is a strong generic task tool. Teams use it as marketing workflow software by composing boards per campaign. The gap shows up fast: Monday has no campaign record for the task to attach to, no segment reference for the audience, no content versioning, no automated QA checks, no launch gate, no live monitoring dashboard, no attribution integration, no retrospective composition, and no native messaging layer. Teams on Monday typically add a CRM, a marketing automation tool, a content tool, and a BI tool to cover the gaps, which is a five-vendor stack with a corresponding sync, procurement, and admin burden. Strkr ships the task runner, the campaign record, the automation engine, the content library, the attribution surface, and the messaging layer on one subscription.
What does the marketing retrospective look like in Strkr?
When a campaign closes, Strkr AI composes a two-paragraph retrospective reading the actual metrics against the brief targets. The retrospective addresses: how the campaign performed against the stated success metrics, which audience segment over- and under-performed, which A/B variant won, which channel contributed most to the conversion, and where the next experiment should target. The retrospective lands as a structured field on the campaign record. A retro meeting auto-schedules one week after campaign close with the campaign owner, the reviewers, and the CMO. The meeting agenda reads from the composed retrospective. Lessons captured during the retro can tag a future brief as a required input, which closes the feedback loop mechanically rather than through operator memory.
Can we build custom marketing workflows for different campaign types?
Yes. The admin configures campaign-type templates with their own brief schemas, approval chains, QA checklists, launch task lists, and retrospective shapes. A nurture campaign carries a lightweight approval chain and a short QA checklist; a product launch carries a full approval chain across brand, legal, product, and exec sponsor with a 40-item QA checklist. Templates are reusable, inheritable, and configurable without engineering support. New campaign types can be added by the marketing operations lead with the same primitives: typed fields, configured approvers, automated and manual QA items, launch tasks, and retrospective fields. The template library grows with the function, which keeps the workflow discipline consistent as the team scales.