Feature · Sales and Marketing Automation

Sales and marketing automation that shares one record, not one integration.

The classic split between marketing automation (Marketo, Pardot, HubSpot Marketing) and sales automation (Outreach, SalesLoft, Clari) ships two records of truth that drift. A lead is a marketing object until it is a sales object, which means the handoff is a sync layer that constantly disagrees with itself. Strkr builds both motions on one record. Campaigns, nurture tracks, cadences, routing, and forecast all run on the same object. The marketer and the SDR see the same reality, and the attribution math closes without a quarterly reconciliation.

Start free trial See pricing
Why marketing and sales always end up on two systems

And what the drift between them actually costs.

The sales-marketing stack formed in an era when marketing automation and CRM were different categories. Marketo was built for marketers. Salesforce was built for sales. The integration between them was a known tax. Twenty years later, the tax has not gone away. A lead that enters Marketo as a form fill, flows into Salesforce as a Lead, converts to a Contact and an Opportunity, drops into Outreach as a cadence enrollee, and lands in Clari as a forecast row, has touched five records of truth. Each has its own permission model, its own audit log, and its own idea of what the lead actually is. The drift between them is where attribution lies to the CMO, where routing fails on the Monday standup, and where the SDR complains that the lead is "already in a cadence somewhere." Strkr builds one record. The sections below walk the drift points and how a single-record approach eliminates each one.

Dual object model

Lead in Marketo, Lead in Salesforce.

The same person exists as a record in both tools. A Marketo update does not necessarily propagate to the Salesforce lead until the next sync batch. A Salesforce update might overwrite a Marketo field. Deduplication is a constant background task. The two objects drift in state, and the drift is only visible when a report disagrees with another report.

Attribution math

The first touch, the last touch, the influenced touch.

When a deal closes, the attribution report has to pull first-touch, last-touch, and influenced-touch data across both systems. Each tool has its own idea of what counts as a touch. The math never fully agrees. The CMO presenting attribution to the CFO has to caveat every number. Native sales-marketing collapses the attribution to one query against one audit log.

Permission drift

Marketing sees fields sales does not, and vice versa.

Marketing has fields on the lead that sales does not care about (campaign source, UTM parameters, email engagement score). Sales has fields on the deal that marketing does not care about (close date, forecast category, next step). Each tool enforces its own permission model. A field that is visible in one tool but masked in the other creates confusion in cross-functional reviews.

Timing lag

The handoff happens minutes to hours late.

A lead that completes the demo-request form at 10:03 AM lands in Salesforce at 10:08 after a sync batch. The SDR sees the new lead on their desk eight minutes after the prospect was ready to talk. The lag is baked into the integration. Native sales-marketing fires the first-touch task in real time because the handoff is a state transition, not a sync.

Audit split

The deal story lives across two logs.

A manager investigating why a lead was routed to the wrong SDR has to open both Marketo and Salesforce audit logs. The timestamps are offset. The actor names do not match. The reconstruction takes an hour. Native sales-marketing keeps the full history on the record where the lead lives.

License stack

Two renewals, two negotiations.

Marketo and Salesforce are two separate contracts, two renewal cycles, and two procurement conversations. Marketing owns one. Sales owns the other. Finance budgets both. Native consolidates to one license with one renewal, which simplifies the vendor relationship and the negotiation leverage.

Routing conflicts

Both tools try to assign the lead.

Marketo scoring rules route the lead to a track. Salesforce assignment rules route the lead to a owner. The two sets of rules can conflict, and the conflict is only visible when the lead ends up in the wrong queue. Native routing is one engine with one rule set.

Reporting latency

The attribution dashboard runs on yesterday's data.

Marketing dashboards usually run on a daily ETL from the stack. Sales dashboards usually run on live CRM data. The two never agree on today's state. A VP running a Monday review sees two conflicting numbers. Native sales-marketing reporting runs on one dataset in real time.

Rep experience

The SDR toggles between four tabs.

An SDR working a lead opens Salesforce for the record, Marketo for the engagement history, Outreach for the cadence state, and LinkedIn Sales Nav for the prospect profile. Four tabs. Four UIs. Native consolidates the lead view to one surface with the engagement history, the cadence state, and the enrichment all on one page.

What a one-record sales-marketing platform does differently

The capabilities that unify when the object is unified.

Collapsing sales and marketing automation to one record is not just a UI consolidation. It unlocks a list of capabilities that only work when the two sides of the funnel share state. The sections below walk each one with the detail a RevOps lead would want before migrating off a split stack.

Bidirectional handoff

Sales to nurture, nurture to sales, no drift.

A lead that was in the SDR queue and did not convert flows back into the marketing nurture track with a flag. A nurture lead that takes a strong engagement signal re-enters the SDR queue. The handoff is a state transition on the same record, visible to both sides. No "already in nurture" surprises on the Monday standup.

Full-funnel attribution

First touch to closed-won, one query.

The attribution report runs one query against one audit log. First touch, mid-funnel touches, last touch, and closed-won all pull from the same timeline. The CMO presenting to the CFO is not caveating cross-system math. The number is defensible because the records are the same records.

Shared segmentation

Marketing segments and sales territories, same taxonomy.

A segment in the marketing side (SMB tech) is the same object as a segment on the sales side. The territory routing uses the same segmentation that the campaign targeting uses. When the GTM strategy updates, both sides update together. No "marketing says SMB tech, sales says mid-market" vocabulary drift.

Campaign to deal

A campaign's influence shows up on the deal card.

Every deal shows the campaign history that touched the account before close: which webinars the stakeholders attended, which emails they opened, which content they downloaded. The deal review opens with the real engagement context. The CMO sees which campaigns closed deals in which segments. The CRO sees which content works.

Unified routing

One rules engine for lead and account.

The lead router and the account routing use the same rules engine. A new inbound lead at a named account routes to the parent account owner. The rules are visible, auditable, and editable without a deploy. No conflicting Marketo and Salesforce rule sets.

Cadences from campaigns

Marketing nurture, sales cadence, same engine.

Nurture tracks and sales cadences run on the same engine with the same step types and the same wait logic. Moving a lead from a nurture to a cadence is a state transition. Reporting on both uses the same metrics. The admin skill set applies to both motions.

Real-time scoring

Engagement moves the score instantly.

An email open, a page view, a form fill, or a demo request updates the lead score in real time. The score drives routing, cadence enrollment, and SDR prioritization without a sync batch. The feedback loop between marketing activity and sales action is tight.

Shared audit log

Every touch, every actor, one history.

The lead's history is one timeline: marketing campaigns, email engagements, form fills, SDR calls, AE emails, meeting attendance, proposal views, counter-signed contract. The timeline is queryable, exportable, and auditable. A quarterly funnel review has one dataset, not two.

Permission consolidation

One role model, one quarterly review.

Marketing and sales users share a role model with field-level and record-level scopes. A marketing manager has visibility into the sales pipeline for attribution. An AE has visibility into the campaign history on their accounts. Each role sees exactly what it needs, enforced on save. Access reviews run once per quarter, not twice.

The motions that work better unified

Three cross-functional patterns from real customer runs.

Theoretical unification is cheap. Practical unification shows up in the motions where sales and marketing historically disagree. The three patterns below are the ones that recur across almost every Strkr customer. Each demonstrates where the one-record approach saves a measurable number of hours per quarter.

Account-based motion

Marketing and sales plan one account together.

For named accounts, marketing and sales share one target list, one engagement plan, and one scoring model. The campaign targets the stakeholders. The AE sees every engagement on the account. The CSM is looped in on expansion signals. The account record is the source of truth. No "marketing is working account A, sales is working account A, nobody told each other" overlap.

MQL to SQL

The qualification handoff, in minutes.

A lead that hits the MQL threshold routes to the SDR queue in real time with a 1-hour SLA. The SDR sees the full engagement history, the ICP score, and the suggested first-touch angle. The SDR qualifies, promotes to SQL, and the AE picks up. The whole handoff happens inside one record without a sync lag.

Attribution review

The CMO presents numbers the CFO trusts.

Quarterly, the CMO walks through attribution: which campaigns sourced which deals, which content assisted which stages, which channels drove which segments. The data runs off the one record. The CFO can audit any number down to the touches. The marketing budget conversation happens on data, not on narrative.

How Strkr compares to the common stacks

Marketo plus Salesforce, HubSpot bundle, Pardot plus Sales Cloud.

Teams evaluating a unified platform usually come from one of three stacks: Marketo plus Salesforce, HubSpot (Marketing Hub plus Sales Hub), or Pardot plus Sales Cloud. Each has real strengths and real limits. the comparison walks the capability gaps that show up when the two motions share one record versus two.

Marketo plus Salesforce

Powerful, expensive, two records of truth.

Marketo plus Salesforce is the enterprise standard for a reason: both tools are deep. The cost is the integration layer, the dedicated admin headcount, and the quarterly attribution reconciliation. For teams at 500 reps with a dedicated RevOps function, the stack earns its keep. For teams at 30 or 50 reps, the cost is the ratio of configuration time to selling time.

HubSpot bundle

One vendor, uneven depth at scale.

HubSpot ships Marketing Hub and Sales Hub as a bundle with a shared contact database. The unification is real at the contact level. The limits show up on complex deal structures, custom objects, and enterprise forecast models, where the Sales Hub side plateaus. For mid-market teams the bundle works. For teams that need methodology-grade pipeline rigor, the sales side runs out of depth.

Pardot plus Sales Cloud

Deep integration, admin-heavy.

Pardot (Account Engagement) plus Sales Cloud shares a database. The integration is tighter than Marketo plus Salesforce. The cost is the admin burden: Pardot business unit configuration, campaign hierarchy design, and the general Salesforce admin salary. For teams already running Salesforce with a mature admin function, the stack works. For teams without that function, the ratio skews heavily toward configuration.

Strkr

One record, flat pricing, no admin assumed.

Strkr ships lead router, nurture engine, cadence engine, campaign tracking, attribution, forecast, and pipeline on one record with a flat pricing posture that scales with the seat count. The capability curve matches HubSpot Pro and Pardot Growth. The pricing curve is flatter. The admin assumption is zero. The target buyer is a growing team that cannot afford a dedicated RevOps function yet.

The dealbreaker test

Can the attribution report defend itself?

The honest test is whether the attribution report can defend itself in front of the CFO. With two records of truth, the answer is "mostly, with caveats." With one record of truth, the answer is "yes, down to the individual touch." The dealbreaker is the credibility of the dollar-sourced number, and the credibility compounds across quarters.

The migration shape

From split stack to one record, in a quarter.

Teams migrating from a split stack to Strkr typically run both in parallel for a quarter. Marketing continues to run its existing nurtures while Strkr absorbs the sales side. New campaigns build on Strkr. Over a quarter, the volume of leads flowing through the one record approaches 80 percent of inbound, and the old stack is retired at the next renewal cycle. The migration is incremental, not big-bang.

Sales and marketing automation on one record, with the attribution math that holds up.

Open a free trial, connect your lead sources, and run marketing campaigns and sales cadences on the same record inside the first week. Full-funnel attribution, bidirectional handoff, shared segmentation, and unified routing are included on every paid tier. No credit meter, no sync layer, no two-vendor stack. The seat price covers both motions.

Start free trial See marketing automation
Common questions

What buyers ask about this feature.

How is Strkr different from HubSpot Marketing Hub plus Sales Hub?

HubSpot bundles Marketing Hub and Sales Hub on a shared contact database, which is real unification at the contact level. The limits show up on the sales side at scale: complex deal structures, custom objects, methodology-grade pipeline rigor, and enterprise forecast models tend to plateau in Sales Hub around the 50-rep mark. Strkr ships the full sales depth (stage policies, deal risk, model-vs-rep forecast, named-account routing) on every paid tier alongside the marketing capabilities. For teams under 20 reps HubSpot is often the right call. For teams scaling into methodology-grade sales rigor, Strkr's one-record approach keeps the depth without a tier climb.

What about Marketo plus Salesforce for enterprise teams?

Marketo plus Salesforce is deeply capable and expensive. The pattern works for teams with a dedicated RevOps function, a certified Salesforce admin, and a Marketo-trained marketing ops lead. The cost is a six-figure annual contract plus the headcount to run both tools. Strkr ships the capability curve that matches Marketo plus Salesforce for most revenue motions, with a flatter pricing posture and no admin assumption. Teams migrating from the stack typically run both in parallel for a quarter and retire the old stack at the next renewal cycle. For enterprise teams that are deeply committed to the stack, Strkr integrates via webhooks and APIs rather than requiring a full migration.

How does the handoff between marketing and sales work?

The handoff is a state transition on one record, not a sync between two systems. A lead that crosses the MQL threshold routes to the SDR queue with a 1-hour SLA, carrying the full engagement history, the ICP score, and the suggested first-touch angle. The SDR works the lead, qualifies, promotes to SQL, and the AE picks up on the same record. A lead that was in the SDR queue and did not convert flows back into the marketing nurture track with a flag. The handoff is bidirectional, visible on the record timeline, and audited. No "already in nurture" surprises on the Monday standup.

Can we run multi-channel campaigns (email, SMS, LinkedIn)?

Yes. The campaign engine supports email, SMS through Strkr Messaging, LinkedIn tasks, and in-app notifications. A multi-channel nurture track can send an email on Day 0, an SMS on Day 2, a LinkedIn connect task on Day 4, and a follow-up email on Day 7. Each channel carries its own engagement reporting and feeds into the lead score. Strkr Messaging ships the SMS and MMS layer natively (37 percent cheaper than Twilio on tier-1 US carriers). LinkedIn tasks route to the SDR for execution. No separate vendor for SMS, no separate vendor for cadence orchestration.

How does attribution work in a one-record model?

Every touch on a lead or an account lands on the record timeline with a channel, a campaign, a cost (where applicable), and a timestamp. The attribution report runs one query against one timeline: first-touch, mid-funnel touches, last-touch, and closed-won. Multi-touch attribution models (linear, time-decay, position-based) are configurable at the tenant level. The CMO presenting to the CFO can defend any number down to the individual touch because the records are the same records that the sales deal rolled up from. There is no reconciliation between a marketing attribution report and a sales pipeline report.

Is sales and marketing automation included on every tier?

Core sales and marketing automation ships on every paid Strkr tier: lead router, nurture engine, cadence engine, campaign tracking, attribution, pipeline, and forecast. Multi-touch attribution with configurable models, A/B flow variants, and bidirectional handoff with re-nurture flags are included on Pro and above. Advanced account-based motion with named-account hierarchy and parallel approver branches on complex deals is included on Scale and Enterprise. There is no separate SKU for the marketing automation side, no per-send email meter, and no cadence execution charge. The seat price listed on the pricing page is the full price.

Related features

Pair this with...

Marketing Automation Sales Automation CRM Marketing Automation B2B Marketing Automation Email Marketing Automation AI Marketing Automation Campaigns

Try it free. Bring your team next week.

No sales call, no migration consultant, no four-month implementation. Enter your card, get 14 days of the full Pro tier, cancel any time before day 14 with zero charge. Spin up a workspace, import your CSV, and have something useful before lunch.

Start free trial See pricing