Law firms run on matters, not deals. Intake, conflicts, engagement letters, matter delivery, trust-adjacent workflow, and client retention compound differently than any other professional services motion. Strkr ships primitives for the matter lifecycle alongside the practice management system most firms already run.
Law firms sit in an awkward CRM category. The practice management platforms (Clio Manage, PracticePanther, MyCase, Rocket Matter) own matters, time, trust, and billing but ship weak client-relationship capabilities. The horizontal CRMs (HubSpot, Salesforce) model deals and contacts but have no concept of a matter. Firms end up stacking tools or working around the gap. The right CRM runs beside the practice management system and owns the client lifecycle, intake flow, and growth motions.
Law firm inquiries arrive via phone, web form, email, referral partner message, and lawyer-direct outreach. Without a structured intake workflow, inquiries sit in individual inboxes for days. A plaintiff firm might lose 10 to 20 percent of inquiries to delay alone. Strkr runs intake as a structured queue with source, status, and conflicts routing.
Conflicts check happens in the practice management system but the full relationship history (former clients, adverse parties, prior consultations) often lives in email archives, personal lawyer notes, and the shared drive. The paralegal runs the check manually. Strkr pulls relationship history onto the intake record so the conflicts review runs on structured data.
A matter has an originating partner, a responsible attorney, a billing partner, a fee structure (hourly, contingency, flat, hybrid), a court or venue, an opposing counsel, and often a dozen related entities (parties, witnesses, experts). Generic CRMs model one deal with one owner. Law firms need the matter primitive. Strkr ships matter as a first-class record.
Law firms depend on referral networks (other firms, former clients, allied professionals). Without a tracked referral motion, follow-up happens unevenly. The relationship with the top-referring firm gets neglected while a one-time referrer gets the lunch meeting. Strkr tracks referral sources as structured contacts with lifetime matter value and relationship cadence.
Law firm marketing runs under state bar advertising rules with specific consent requirements, content restrictions, and record-keeping obligations. Generic marketing tools do not accommodate these. Strkr Marketing module runs with audit logging and consent fields that match the compliance requirements of most state bars.
Firms with 20 or more lawyers often have no BD visibility. Who is calling which clients? Which associate is building which relationship? Which prospect visited the firm website last month? Strkr brings BD activity onto the contact record so firm leadership runs BD meetings on structured data.
Strkr runs beside Clio Manage, PracticePanther, MyCase, or whichever practice management system the firm uses. The practice management platform continues to own matters, time entries, trust accounting, billing, and the regulated case management workflow. Strkr owns the client relationship layer, intake flow, referral tracking, business development visibility, and the operational motions that firms run on top of case delivery.
Each matter has originating partner, responsible attorney, billing partner, fee structure, matter type, court or venue, opposing counsel, and related entities as native fields. The record carries intake date, engagement date, close date, and realization math. The firm sees matter economics on one record.
Phone inquiries, web form submissions, email, referral partner messages, and lawyer-direct outreach all land in a structured intake queue with source, status, assigned intake coordinator, and routing to the right practice area. SLA runs on first-response time. The partner sees intake pipeline live.
The practice management conflicts check runs its structured query. Strkr adds the relationship context: former clients, prior consultations, referral relationships, adverse parties mentioned in call notes. The paralegal runs the full review on one surface instead of three.
Strkr Docs holds the engagement letter template per matter type. Native integrations with DocuSign and PandaDoc route for signature. The signed PDF lands on the matter record with executed date, parties, and fee structure parsed into fields. The intake-to-engagement cycle takes hours, not a week.
Referral sources are structured contacts with lifetime referral count, lifetime matter value, and relationship cadence. Firm leadership sees which referral relationships drive revenue. The quarterly BD meeting runs on structured data instead of partner memory.
Strkr Marketing module runs campaigns against segments. Consent state, prior client relationship, and jurisdiction are fields that drive audience logic. Audit logs track every send. The firm compliance partner approves campaigns through a review workflow that matches state bar advertising rules.
Lawyer BD activity (calls, meetings, lunches, speaking events) lands on the contact record. Partners see associate BD activity. Firm leadership sees BD pipeline. The quarterly BD review runs on live data instead of self-reported summaries.
Strkr AI drafts structured summaries from intake calls, flags potentially conflicted matters based on name matching, and drafts routine follow-up communications. The capability does not touch regulated legal advice. Legal work stays in the practice management system and lawyer judgment.
For firms running fixed-fee or project-shaped matters (M&A deals, estate planning packages, trademark registrations), the Projects module tracks milestone delivery with per-task owners and due dates. The practice management system owns time and billing. Strkr owns delivery coordination.
Law firms span dramatically different operational motions. Plaintiff contingency firms differ from BigLaw transactional practices. Boutique estate planning firms differ from immigration law practices. The matrix below sorts practice areas by Strkr fit.
Personal injury, mass tort, and consumer protection plaintiff firms fit Strkr well. High-volume intake, contingency fee economics, long settlement cycles, and referral-heavy BD motion all run on structured records. Strkr handles the intake-to-engagement cycle and the relationship with referring medical providers and attorneys.
Family law firms (divorce, custody, estate planning) fit Strkr because the intake process is high-touch and the client relationship extends beyond the matter. Follow-up outreach, bar-compliant marketing, and referral tracking all run on Strkr alongside the practice management system.
Immigration firms fit Strkr because the intake process involves significant document collection, consent review, and multi-channel communication. The Projects module tracks document collection as structured workspaces. The practice management system handles case strategy and filing.
Estate planning practices fit Strkr because the household primitive captures family units cleanly. Review cadence (every 3 to 5 years), referral tracking across generations, and the recurring update motion all run on structured records.
Boutique transactional firms (M&A boutiques, startup counsel, IP firms) fit Strkr because matter-level attribution, deal pipeline, and referral tracking all run on one record. Firm leadership sees matter economics alongside BD activity.
AmLaw 100 firms with deep InterAction, LexisNexis, or Salesforce deployments usually stay on their existing stack. Specialized BigLaw BD platforms carry integration depth with court records, docketing, and specialized research tools that Strkr does not try to match. Below AmLaw 100 scale, Strkr fits better.
Public defender offices, legal aid organizations, and government legal departments have specific workflow needs around case assignment, grant tracking, and funder reporting. Strkr fits for the client relationship layer. Case management often stays in a specialized government legal platform.
Law firm intake is where most firms leak revenue. The workflow below is what firms that have optimized intake run through. Each step is a structural capability a CRM has to support. Vendors that fail on these items force the firm to handle intake in email and spreadsheets.
Phone, web form, email, referral partner, and lawyer-direct inquiries all land in the same intake queue. Each carries source attribution. The intake coordinator sees everything on one surface instead of reconciling across inboxes.
The intake queue carries an SLA on first response (often 15 to 60 minutes depending on firm). Timers run live. Breach alerts route to the intake coordinator and the originating partner. The firm captures inquiries competitors lose to delay.
Strkr AI flags potentially conflicted inquiries based on name matching against the full relationship history. The paralegal runs the structured conflicts check in the practice management system. The combined check runs faster and surfaces more.
Based on intake content, the inquiry routes to the right practice area partner. Routing logic can include matter type, jurisdiction, estimated value, and partner capacity. The partner receives a routed task, not an email cc.
The intake coordinator schedules the consultation using the firm calendar integration. The confirmation flow runs through Strkr Messaging for SMS and the Microsoft 365 or Gmail integration for email. The client receives a professional sequence.
If the firm takes the matter, the engagement letter drafts from the matter-type template, routes through DocuSign or PandaDoc, and lands on the matter record with fee structure parsed into fields. Intake-to-engagement runs in hours.
Inquiries the firm declines (outside practice area, outside jurisdiction, conflicted) receive a professional decline communication and get added to the referral partner network if appropriate. Nothing goes silent.
Firm leadership sees intake volume by source, conversion rate by practice area, and intake-to-matter attribution weekly. BD investment runs on conversion data instead of partner intuition.
Law firms carry specific ethical obligations around client confidentiality, data handling, and advertising. The vendor posture matters at ethics board review time. Vendors that fail on these items usually surface issues after deployment.
Field-level and record-level permissions scope client-privileged information to users with proper access. Audit logs capture every access. The role model matches what ethics boards expect from a vendor holding privileged data.
Strkr runs on AWS with encryption at rest and in transit. SOC 2 Type II is in progress through 2026-Q4. HIPAA BAA is available for firms with medical malpractice, health-adjacent, or regulated client workflows. The vendor packet typically clears firm ethics review in one cycle.
The firm compliance partner needs to prove bar-rule adherence on every marketing send. Strkr audit logs track every campaign with send date, audience logic, consent state at send, and content version. The record stands up to a bar inquiry.
Client file retention requirements vary by state bar. Strkr tags documents, call notes, and communications with retention windows and enforces policy at the data layer. The firm maintains defensible retention posture without manual process.
Trust accounting lives in the practice management system where it belongs. The CRM runs beside trust workflow without taking trust-adjacent actions. The compliance partner sees clear system boundaries.
SAML SSO and MFA ship on every paid tier. The firm IT team integrates Strkr with the existing IdP. Session policy, password policy, and IP allowlisting are available for firms that need them.
Strkr runs on US-based AWS infrastructure. Data export runs through a self-serve exporter to clean CSV and JSON in minutes. The firm has defensible data posture and clean exit if the vendor relationship changes.
Most law firms outside AmLaw 100 run a stack: Clio Manage or PracticePanther for matters and billing, a separate email list vendor for client communication, Dropbox or SharePoint for documents, Outlook for calendar, and a shared spreadsheet for intake tracking. Strkr consolidates the relationship, intake, and BD layer.
| Feature | Strkr | Clio or PracticePanther + Mailchimp + spreadsheet + Dropbox |
|---|---|---|
| Matter primitive | Native with full attribution fields | Practice management owns, CRM forced to deal object |
| Intake queue | Structured across channels with SLA | Email inboxes plus spreadsheet |
| Conflicts enrichment | Relationship history alongside PM check | PM check only |
| Referral source tracking | Lifetime matter value and cadence | Partner memory |
| Marketing with bar compliance | Native with audit logs | Separate Mailchimp without audit integration |
| BD dashboards | Lawyer activity on contact records | Self-reported partner summaries |
| Engagement letter workflow | Draft, route, store, parse into fields | Manual Word doc plus DocuSign |
| Projects for matter delivery | Native on every paid tier | Spreadsheet or separate PM tool |
| SSO and MFA on every tier | Yes | Varies by practice management vendor |
| HIPAA with BAA | Available on request | Varies |
| Three-year total cost (15 lawyers) | Approximately 48 thousand consolidated | Approximately 72 thousand across vendors |
| Mobile posture | First-class with offline queue | Varies, often PM-system-dependent |
The law firms building on Strkr span plaintiff practices, family law firms, immigration law practices, estate planning boutiques, and transactional boutiques. The playbooks below describe operational patterns inside the first year.
A plaintiff personal injury firm with 8 lawyers runs intake across phone, web form, and referral partner inquiries. Strkr tracks the 15-minute first-response SLA. Breach alerts route to the intake manager. Capture rate climbs from 68 percent to 84 percent inside one quarter. The firm captures inquiries competitors lose to delay.
A 5-lawyer family law practice runs intake with care for emotionally sensitive inquiries. The intake coordinator uses Strkr AI drafted call summaries to maintain consistency across intakes. Follow-up communication runs through the Marketing module with bar-compliant content. Consultation conversion climbs 22 percent.
An immigration law firm runs document collection as a Projects workspace per matter with per-document owners and client-facing status. Strkr Messaging covers SMS reminders. The paralegal sees outstanding items across the active caseload on one dashboard. Document collection time drops by 40 percent.
An 8-lawyer estate planning boutique uses the household primitive to capture family units cleanly. Review cadence (every 3 to 5 years) runs on a tracked clock. Referral tracking across generations surfaces lineage patterns. The practice compounds relationships across decades.
A 12-lawyer M&A boutique runs weekly BD meetings on Strkr data. Lawyer activity (calls, meetings, speaking events) lands on contact records. Firm leadership sees pipeline, origination credit, and relationship cadence live. BD discipline climbs because the data is visible to everyone, not just the originating partner.
Start a 14-day trial. See Strkr with matter primitive, structured intake queue, conflicts enrichment, bar-compliant marketing, and BD dashboards configured for the firm shape. Full product on every paid tier.
No. Strkr is not a practice management platform and does not try to replace one. Clio Manage, PracticePanther, MyCase, Rocket Matter, and other practice management systems continue to own matters, time entries, trust accounting, billing, and the regulated case management workflow. Strkr owns the client relationship layer: intake queue, referral tracking, business development visibility, bar-compliant marketing, and the operational motions that firms run on top of case delivery. The two systems integrate through published API paths where available.
The practice management system runs the structured conflicts query against its matter database. Strkr adds the relationship context: former clients, prior consultations, referral relationships, adverse parties mentioned in call notes. The paralegal runs the combined review on one surface. Strkr AI flags potentially conflicted inquiries at intake based on name matching against the full relationship history. The firm catches conflicts earlier and resolves them with structured evidence rather than paralegal memory.
Yes. Strkr Marketing module runs with consent state as a native field, jurisdiction tagging on every contact, audit logs on every send, and a review workflow for firm compliance partner approval. The audit log captures every campaign with send date, audience logic, consent state at send, and content version. The record stands up to a bar inquiry. For firms with specific state bar requirements, the configuration adjusts to match. The compliance partner approves campaigns through the review workflow.
Strkr fits law firms from solo practitioners through roughly 150-lawyer regional firms. Below solo scale, the firm often runs on a smaller operation. Above 150 lawyers, AmLaw 100 firms with deep InterAction, LexisNexis, or Salesforce deployments usually stay on their existing stack because the specialized BigLaw BD platforms carry integration depth that Strkr does not try to match. For most firms in the mid-market and boutique bands, Strkr fits as the modern CRM layer alongside the practice management system.
Yes. Multi-channel intake is a core capability. Phone inquiries (captured through the native call integration), web form submissions, email, referral partner messages, and lawyer-direct outreach all land in the structured intake queue with source attribution. First-response SLA runs on timers. Routing logic sends the inquiry to the right practice area partner. The intake-to-engagement cycle runs on structured handoffs instead of email cc chains.
Strkr migration tool pulls intake records, contacts, referral sources, communication history, and workflow automations from the common law firm CRMs over a focused weekend. Workflow automations rebuild in the Strkr Flow canvas during the first two weeks. Marketing templates import to the Strkr Marketing module. Historical campaign data imports as reference. Most mid-size firms complete the full migration in 4 to 8 weeks running both systems in parallel before cutover. The practice management system (Clio Manage or similar) continues running throughout the migration.
Strkr AI handles tasks that improve firm productivity without touching regulated legal advice. It drafts structured call summaries from intake conversations, flags potentially conflicted inquiries based on name matching, drafts routine follow-up communications, and suggests the next step on stalled intake. It does not provide legal advice, generate case strategy, draft substantive legal documents, or participate in representation decisions. The regulated legal work stays in the practice management system and in lawyer judgment. The firm compliance partner approves the Strkr AI scope in a focused review.
No sales call, no migration consultant, no four-month implementation. Enter your card, get 14 days of the full Pro tier, cancel any time before day 14 with zero charge. Spin up a workspace, import your CSV, and have something useful before lunch.
