Built for creative agencies running design proposals

A design proposal template that pairs with CRM-connected drafting for the agency motion.

A design proposal is a brand expression as much as a scope document. The agency pitching creative work usually opens the proposal, pulls a template from Canva or Figma, sketches a hero spread, writes the scope and pricing, exports, sends. The workflow is design-first because the proposal demonstrates the brand chops. The problem at scale: the CRM has no visibility into the proposal state, approval runs through Slack DMs, and nobody tracks which template version is actually winning the pitch.

Start free trial See pricing
What this audience is actually dealing with

The pains that bring buyers here.

Design agencies, brand studios, and creative shops typically run proposal workflows that look nothing like the enterprise B2B template. The design proposal template matters as a brand expression; the content is lighter on legal and heavier on vision. Four pain patterns show up repeatedly in creative-agency sales calls. The design surface and the CRM live in parallel universes. Approval workflows run through Slack DMs. Nobody tracks which template version wins. And the signed version lives in the designer's inbox, not on the CRM deal.

Design surface and CRM live in parallel universes

The deal record and the Figma proposal do not share state.

A design agency AM drafts a proposal in Figma or Canva pulling the account name, scope, and pricing from the CRM manually. The design iterates in the Figma file; the CRM does not reflect the change. The pre-send review reads from Figma; the signed version lives in the buyer email thread. Strkr pairs the CRM deal record with Strkr AI drafting so the two surfaces share state throughout the workflow.

Approval runs through Slack DMs

Creative director approval sits in a Thursday thread.

The AM drafts the proposal in Figma, exports a PDF, sends it to the creative director via Slack DM for approval. The creative director opens on mobile, drops in-line comments or redlines, forwards back. The AM applies changes, exports again, sends again. Each approval round burns half a day. Strkr runs approval natively on the deal with SLA timers and escalation so the Thursday Slack thread stops being the system of record.

Template performance is a mystery

The agency sends 60 proposals a quarter across 4 shapes; nobody knows which wins.

The agency runs 4 proposal template shapes (full-rebrand, campaign-specific, retainer-renewal, project-one-off) and sends 60 proposals a quarter across them. Nobody tracks win rate per shape. The partner has no basis for retiring the low performers or doubling down on the winners. Strkr tracks win rate per template version so template iteration runs on data instead of gut feel.

Signed version lives in the designer email

The CRM shows nothing; the PDF lives in Gmail.

The buyer signs the PDF (through DocuSign or a mailed physical signature in some creative-agency motions) and returns the signed version in an email. The signed version lives in the AM's email thread; the CRM shows the pre-signed draft or no attachment. The audit trail splits. Strkr integrates with DocuSign and PandaDoc for signature routing and the signed version lands on the deal automatically.

Scope creep lives outside the proposal

The signed scope and the invoiced scope diverge over time.

Creative agencies lose roughly 12 to 20 percent of margin to scope creep that was not captured against the signed proposal. The signed version lives in a PDF; the project runs in Asana or similar; nobody reconciles the diverging scope. Strkr runs the signed scope on the deal record with the service module tracking changes against the baseline so scope creep surfaces weekly instead of at project retrospective.

Brand voice shifts across writers

Each AM writes the executive summary differently.

The design proposal template provides the layout. Each AM writes the executive summary in their own voice. The buyer receiving three proposals from the agency over the quarter notices the drift. Strkr brand voice policy enforces tone, reading level, and forbidden phrases on every AI draft. The agency reads as one voice across proposals.

How Strkr pairs with a design-first workflow

CRM workflow plus design freedom together.

Strkr does not try to replace the design surface for creative agencies. The pattern is to keep Canva, Figma, or a specialty tool for the design and use Strkr for the CRM workflow (deal tracking, Strkr AI drafting of body copy, approval routing, signature integration, template win-rate reporting). The capability cards below walk the surface.

Deal-aware drafting of body content

Strkr AI drafts the scope and executive summary.

Strkr AI reads the deal record (account, contacts, scope, pricing, term, open opportunity history) and drafts the body content of the proposal: executive summary, scope narrative, pricing explanation, deliverables, timeline. The designer imports the body into the Figma or Canva design file. The design surface stays with the design tool; the body content comes from the AI draft.

Brand voice policy on every draft

Tone, reading level, forbidden phrases enforced.

The agency configures a brand voice policy applied to every AI draft (brand tone descriptor, reading level target, forbidden phrases, approved product names, approved value-prop phrases). The agency's voice stays consistent across AMs and proposals. New AMs produce on-brand body content without a one-month ramp.

Template library with win-rate tracking

Full-rebrand, campaign, retainer, one-off shapes tracked.

The agency maintains a library of proposal template shapes with Strkr tracking win rate per shape against the pipeline. The partner sees which template wins at what rate and iterates. The library informs which shape the AI drafts for a new deal based on segment, scope, and historical win rate.

Internal approval routing

Creative director, partner, finance approvals with SLA.

Approval workflows run natively on the deal with SLA timers and escalation. Creative director sign-off on brand alignment; partner sign-off on pricing above threshold; finance review on multi-month retainer terms. Each approval carries a timer that escalates if the approver does not respond within window.

PandaDoc and DocuSign signature integration

Signed version lands on the Strkr deal automatically.

The approved proposal routes to PandaDoc or DocuSign for signature. The signed version lands back on the Strkr deal record on completion. The audit trail stays on one record. The specialty signature tool handles the signature infrastructure where it stays deepest.

Scope-change tracking on service record

Signed scope versus invoiced scope reconciliation.

The signed scope lives on the deal with the service module tracking project changes against the baseline. Scope changes surface weekly: additional deliverables requested, timeline extensions, revised pricing. The agency recovers 8 to 15 percent of margin that used to leak to unbilled scope creep because the drift surfaces inline instead of at project retrospective.

Closed-won cascade for creative projects

Signature triggers project setup and client portal.

When the proposal is signed, Strkr fires the closed-won cascade: deal stage flips, project record creates from a template with tasks, milestones, and assigned roles, client portal provisions, and the first invoice generates through QuickBooks or Stripe integration. The agency AM stops managing the handoff manually.

Client-facing project portal

A branded status page per project.

Each creative project exposes an optional client-facing status page with milestones, upcoming deliverables, open approvals, and a document shelf. The agency shares progress without emailing a weekly PDF status update. The portal respects project membership so the client sees their project only.

Multi-touch attribution on creative pipeline

Content and referral touches tracked across the funnel.

Strkr tracks first-touch, last-touch, lead-create-touch, and opportunity-create-touch on every account. The agency sees which case studies warmed the pipeline, which referrals converted at what rate, and which campaigns closed the deal. Content and referral investment runs on attribution data rather than gut feel.

When to keep the design-first workflow

The scenarios where Strkr pairs rather than replaces.

Strkr handles the CRM workflow around the proposal; the design-first tool handles the design itself. Three scenarios where this pairing earns the budget line better than trying to consolidate everything on one platform.

Brand expression is the sales demo

The proposal shows what the agency can design.

For creative agencies, the proposal itself is a brand demonstration. The hero spread, the typography, the layout rhythm all communicate what the agency can do for the buyer. Keeping Canva, Figma, or InDesign for the design surface preserves the brand expression. Strkr handles the CRM workflow around the design.

Figma collaboration for team drafts

The design team already lives in Figma.

Design teams running proposals in Figma benefit from the real-time collaboration, component system, and brand library integration that Figma provides. Strkr does not try to replicate Figma; the agency drafts the body in Strkr AI, imports into Figma for design, and the signed version lands back on the Strkr deal via DocuSign integration.

Print-ready delivery for premium clients

Premium creative agencies deliver physical proposals.

Some premium creative agencies deliver physical proposals (printed, bound, mailed) for enterprise pitches. Canva and InDesign provide print-ready export with bleed, crop marks, and CMYK conversion. Strkr does not run a print-production surface. The agency runs the physical delivery through the design specialist and tracks the deal state in Strkr.

Specialty creative file formats

Interactive PDF or video-embedded proposals.

Agencies running interactive PDFs or video-embedded proposals typically use Qwilr, Readz, or a specialty tool for the interactive format. Strkr handles the body content drafting and the CRM workflow; the specialty tool handles the interactive presentation.

Brand system theming across many assets

Agencies managing brand systems in a design-system tool.

Agencies running brand systems in Frontify, Lingo, or similar brand-system tools keep the system in the specialty platform and reference brand assets in proposals from the system. Strkr does not try to replace brand-system tooling. The pairing stays clean.

Compliance posture

SOC 2 Type II in progress; HIPAA with BAA available for regulated creative work.

SOC 2 Type II audit activity is in progress; the Business Associate Agreement is available on request for HIPAA-handling creative work (healthcare branding, pharma marketing, telehealth design) on request. GDPR controls ship on every tier. Agencies in regulated verticals should request the current compliance letter during pilot.

Honest limits

Where Strkr proposal design is deliberately smaller.

Strkr pairs AI drafting with the CRM deal record and routes signature through PandaDoc or DocuSign. Four places where a design-first specialist stays deeper and Strkr integrates rather than replaces.

No Figma or InDesign design surface

Template-based layout; not canvas-free design.

Strkr proposal templates are design-reasonable with configurable blocks (hero, scope, pricing, terms, references) but do not replicate canvas-free design freedom. Creative agencies whose proposals are brand expressions should keep Figma, InDesign, or Canva for the design surface.

No component library at Figma depth

Reusable text blocks yes; design components no.

Strkr supports reusable text blocks and template sections. Figma supports a sophisticated component library with design tokens, variants, and style systems. The design-system depth stays with Figma.

No real-time multi-user design collaboration

Strkr drafting is sequential; Figma is simultaneous.

Strkr drafting workflow is sequential (one AM edits, saves, next AM reviews). Figma supports simultaneous multi-user editing on the same canvas. Design teams collaborating in real time on the proposal visual should keep Figma for that collaboration surface.

No stock photography library

Canva ships a huge library; Strkr does not.

Canva ships a massive image library, icon set, and stock photography collection. Strkr proposal templates work with the agency's uploaded brand assets. Agencies whose proposals rely on stock imagery should keep Canva for the design surface.

No sophisticated print production

PDF export yes; CMYK bleed crop-marks no.

Strkr exports proposals as PDF suitable for digital delivery. Teams delivering print-ready proposals should keep Canva, InDesign, or a specialty print-production tool for the print side.

No interactive video embedding

PDF format does not support interactive video playback.

Strkr proposals export as PDF, which does not support interactive video playback. Agencies running proposals with heavy video content should keep Qwilr or Readz for the buyer-facing interactive presentation and layer Strkr for CRM workflow.

Head-to-head

Design proposal template plus Strkr workflow versus design-tool-only.

Agencies running design proposals typically run Canva or Figma standalone with no CRM connection, or Canva plus Salesforce or HubSpot with a manual export-paste bridge. Here is how Strkr compares to the common patterns.

Feature Strkr Canva or Figma standalone (no CRM connection)
Where body content drafts Strkr AI from the deal record with brand voice policy AM writes from scratch in the design tool
Brand voice consistency Inline policy on every AI draft AM-level writing drives voice drift
Approval workflow Native on the deal with SLA timers and escalation Slack DM to creative director with no SLA
Signature routing Integrated with PandaDoc or DocuSign on the deal record Separate signature tool with manual CRM reattach
Design surface Template-based with configurable blocks Canvas-free design in Figma or Canva
Template win-rate reporting Native dashboard with win rate per template version No performance data on template shapes
Scope-change tracking Signed scope versus invoiced scope reconciled weekly Project tool and signed PDF diverge over time
Closed-won cascade Fires on signature: project setup, client portal, invoice Manual by AM on signed-version receipt
Client portal Branded project status page per client Weekly status PDF via email
Compliance scope SOC 2 Type II in progress, HIPAA with BAA on request No native BAA or regulatory audit trail
How teams use Strkr

How creative agencies run Strkr with their design tool.

The common pattern across creative agencies on Strkr: keep the design-first tool (Canva, Figma, InDesign) for the design, use Strkr for the CRM workflow around it. The playbooks below are live motions from four customer accounts.

Brand studio, 12 designers, Figma for design

Body content drafted in Strkr, imported into Figma, signed through DocuSign.

A brand studio with 12 designers kept Figma for proposal design and ran Strkr for the CRM workflow. Strkr AI drafted the body content (executive summary, scope, pricing, deliverables) from the deal record; the AM imported the body into the Figma proposal file; the creative director approved through Strkr with SLA; the signed version routed through DocuSign and landed back on the deal. Per-proposal time dropped from 2.5 hours to 55 minutes while preserving the design freedom the studio needed.

Design agency, 24 account managers, template win-rate iteration

Retiring one Canva template lifted win rate 5 points.

A design agency ran 4 proposal template shapes with no visibility into win rate. Strkr surfaced that the full-rebrand template won at 51 percent while the campaign-specific template won at 28 percent. The partner retired the campaign shape and standardized on retainer-plus-full-rebrand. Proposal-sourced win rate lifted 5 points in the next quarter.

Boutique agency, scope-creep recovery

Signed scope versus invoiced scope reconciliation recovered 11 percent of margin.

A boutique agency had been losing roughly 15 percent of project margin to unbilled scope creep. The Strkr signed scope on the deal record plus service module tracking changes against the baseline surfaced scope creep weekly. The agency recovered roughly 11 percent of margin back by invoicing against the drift in the quarter following rollout. The partner flagged the margin recovery as the biggest operational move of the year.

Creative agency, approval SLA caught the Thursday-sits

Creative director approval went from 2-day median to 6-hour median.

A creative agency had been losing 1 to 2 days per proposal to creative director approval sitting in a Slack DM. Strkr approval workflow with SLA timers compressed CD approval median from 2 days to 6 hours. The 1.5-day gain per proposal compounded across 80 proposals a quarter meant roughly 120 sales-cycle days back on the quarterly cadence.

Healthcare branding agency, HIPAA BAA on provider work

Compliant proposal workflow for provider branding engagements.

A healthcare branding agency selling into provider networks needed proposal workflow respecting a Business Associate Agreement on PHI-adjacent client data. Strkr runs HIPAA-covered proposal workflows under BAA on request. The agency ran 60 provider branding proposals in the first quarter without buying a separate HIPAA-compliant platform.

Interactive design studio, Qwilr for presentation plus Strkr for workflow

Interactive proposal format stayed with Qwilr; CRM workflow landed on Strkr.

An interactive design studio delivering proposals with embedded video and interactive pricing calculators kept Qwilr for the buyer-facing presentation and ran Strkr for the CRM workflow. Strkr AI drafted the body content from the deal record; the content imported into Qwilr for interactive design; approval ran natively on the Strkr deal; signature routed through DocuSign; the signed version landed back on the Strkr deal. The pairing let the studio preserve the interactive brand expression while compressing proposal cycle time roughly 40 percent.

Full-service agency, 32 account managers, client portal rollout

Weekly PDF status updates disappeared after Strkr portal launch.

A full-service agency with 32 account managers had been sending roughly 240 weekly status update PDFs per week across all retainer clients. The Strkr client-facing project portal replaced the PDF cadence: each client logs in to see milestones, upcoming deliverables, open approvals, and a document shelf for the project. The agency recovered roughly 25 hours a week of AM time that had been going into assembling and sending the weekly status PDFs. The AMs redirected the time into proactive strategic check-ins with clients, which the managing partner flagged as the biggest client-retention improvement of the year.

Boutique brand studio, print proposals with Canva plus Strkr tracking

Physical proposals printed through Canva; Strkr tracked the deal.

A boutique brand studio delivering premium printed proposals (bound, mailed, hand-presented) kept Canva for the print-production design and ran Strkr for CRM tracking. Strkr AI drafted the body content; the designer laid out the physical proposal in Canva; the studio printed and mailed the physical proposal; the Strkr deal tracked the mail-delivery date, the follow-up calls, and the eventual signature (returned by overnight mail or signed through DocuSign on scanned pages). The pairing let the studio preserve the premium physical delivery while running proper CRM tracking.

A design proposal template workflow where Strkr handles the CRM and the design tool keeps the design.

Start a 14-day trial. Pair Strkr AI drafting on the deal record with your existing Figma, Canva, or InDesign workflow. See win-rate reporting on real proposals within the first month.

Start free trial See pricing
Common questions

What buyers in this bucket ask most.

Does Strkr try to replace Figma or Canva for creative agencies?

No. Strkr handles the CRM workflow around the proposal (deal tracking, Strkr AI drafting of body content, approval routing, signature integration, template win-rate reporting). Design-first teams keep Figma, Canva, or InDesign for the design surface. The common pattern is Strkr drafts the body content from the deal record, the designer imports the body into the design tool for layout and brand expression, the creative director approves through Strkr, the signed version routes through DocuSign or PandaDoc and lands back on the Strkr deal.

How does Strkr AI drafting compare to writing from scratch in a design tool?

Strkr AI reads the live deal context (account, contacts, scope, pricing, term, opportunity history) and drafts the body content of the proposal: executive summary, scope narrative, pricing explanation, deliverables, timeline. The AM edits in 5 to 10 minutes instead of writing from scratch in 45 to 60 minutes. The brand voice policy applies to every draft automatically, so voice stays consistent across AMs and proposals. The per-proposal time compression on the drafting layer is typically 80 percent.

How does template win-rate reporting work for a creative agency?

Every proposal carries a template version tag (full-rebrand, campaign, retainer, project-one-off, or custom shapes). The Strkr dashboard tracks win rate, cycle time, and average deal size per template version. The partner sees which template wins at what rate and iterates the library. Template iteration runs on data instead of gut feel. The reporting is native and does not require a data warehouse integration project.

How does Strkr handle scope-creep tracking on creative projects?

The signed scope lives on the Strkr deal record with the service module tracking project changes against the baseline. Scope changes surface weekly: additional deliverables requested, timeline extensions, revised pricing, out-of-scope requests from the client. The agency can either invoice against the drift inline or convert the scope change into a project amendment. Agencies typically recover 8 to 15 percent of margin that used to leak to unbilled scope creep.

What is the AI pricing for a busy creative-agency proposal motion?

Strkr AI drafting on proposals runs on the flat per-seat line with no per-draft credit meter below the plan cap. A busy AM drafting 20 proposals a month plus revisions does not generate a surprise AI invoice. The three-tier model router keeps per-call cost sustainable even at heavy daily drafting volume. The pricing posture is specifically designed to let the daily rhythm run without AI-metering anxiety.

What compliance does Strkr offer for regulated creative work?

SOC 2 Type II audit activity is in progress; the Business Associate Agreement is available on request for HIPAA-handling creative work (healthcare branding, pharma marketing, telehealth design, provider communications) on request. GDPR controls (consent capture, right-to-be-forgotten, EU residency routing where available) ship on every tier. The audit trail captures every proposal version, approval decision, and signature event for compliance review. Agencies in regulated verticals should request the current compliance letter during pilot.

Also built for

Related audiences.

Canva Proposal Templates AI Proposal Generator Budget Proposal Templates For Agencies For AEs For Small Business

Try it free. Bring your team next week.

No sales call, no migration consultant, no four-month implementation. Enter your card, get 14 days of the full Pro tier, cancel any time before day 14 with zero charge. Spin up a workspace, import your CSV, and have something useful before lunch.

Start free trial See pricing